The Lincolnshire Patriot

The Lion Roars

2008-12-05T23:45:00.004Z

Once again we have seen a week of turmoil - from redundacies, social service failures, stalling economy, murders and the marxist approved arrest of an opposition MP. I do not despair BUT i do wonder just when our people will remove the blinkers from their eyes and actually wake up to the lives they lead and the type of country they lead it in. An economy based on wage slavery and debt is not fit for purpose. Times are hard and by God they are going to get harder. My own disposable income (money to spend after paying my way) has shrunk. I am lucky as i am a reasonably high earner - but my job security is minimal, i have already seen colleagues go to the "wall", out of a job. There are NO easy answers to the financial catastrophe we are currently facing. We MUST change the type of government we currently have. The BNP has a series of policies that will at least start to address the malaise that afficts this island home of ours. I do not think that my party (the BNP) has all the answers, BUT our party has OUR interests at heart - no talk of "globalisation", the "benefits of the EU" or other such nonsenses trotted out by our existing three tier party system, all of whom have policies which, when dissected, you could not even separate with a cigarette paper. 2009 will be a milestone year in Nationalist politics - i know you hear this every year - BUT i believe 2009 will be a make or break year for us (not neccessarily for the BNP, but for the Nationalist cause per se). The internet is a wonderfull tool for nationalists but apart from our regular supporters and the "anonymous" comments, we actually attract a relatively small proportion of the voting public - the way forward is through "feet on the street" - nothing, and i mean NOTHING beats beats spreading the word on the street. This dosent have to mean official BNP activity, just talk in your local pub, snooker hall, shop - You dont even have to mention the BNP, and you will be surprised at the tacit level of support we have. Turn this to votes and we will be further down our path to election. The BNP stood locally last year in an area with no previous BNP/Nationalist activity and took 24.6% of the vote - next year it will do better"!

My point is this - we may not have a perfect party, may not offer perfect solutions - but what we have is a "Espirit De Corps" within the Nationalist community, which, if effectively mobilised, will make great inroads into the publics hearts and minds - and in this, my friends, lies the path to success.

BNP Role Of Honour Update

2008-12-05T21:29:00.002Z

The leaked membership list investigation has resulted in two arrests in Brinsley, Nottinghamshire. I wonder who that could be? Shady Sadie is one for my money - which is what i thought from the beginning. Sadie Graham - SCUM! I hope you have a much harder life from here on in, and when you do, think of all the old ladies and women in the BNP who had unwanted and unwarranted phone calls ans abuse thanks to you!And may God help you because the Nationalist cause wont.

Why Am I NOT Surprised?

2008-11-28T15:34:00.003Z

Two of the gunmen arrested after the Mumbai atrocities were of British descent, the country's chief minister has said.
UK authorities played down reports (Cant let anyone think that there are any problems in our multiculti hellhole of a country) that the terrorists included Britons as violence in the city continued for a third day.
But Indian Chief Minister Vilasrao Deshmukh claims two British-born Pakistanis (Moslems?) were among eight gunmen arrested by Indian authorities, according to Associated Press reports.
Indian authorities confirmed the number of foreigners known to be killed in the attacks had risen to eight. At least 143 people - including a wealthy British businessman - were left dead in the wave of terror that swept India's financial capital.
But Slime Minister Gordon Brown said it was too early to tell whether Britons were involved in carrying out the attacks.
And Home Secretary Jacqui Spliff said UK authorities had "no knowledge" of any British links with the massacre.
Indian commandos ended a siege of Mumbai's luxury Oberoi Hotel while other forces descended from helicopters to storm a Jewish centre where at least 10 hostages were being held. At least 25 captives were rushed out of the Oberoi Hotel and loaded into waiting

"No Knowledge" "Played down reports" - watch over the next few days and we will see, but dont hold your breath for the truth from our Politburo

Great News

2008-11-26T01:00:00.002Z

From the blog of the BNP's Martin Wingfield
"THANKS to North Kesteven organiser, Mike Cooper, for forwarding a message from one of his members who is serving overseas.The message reads . . .

"Have just read Part One Orders today - this is where official Army Policy is distributed on a daily basis and there was a WHOLE paragraph about the British National Party!Every soldier in the British Army (ie 100,000 troops) read this daily - they have to by order. The Navy and RAF have similar orders, so add about 40,000 extra personnel on.It says that "any serviceman/woman is entitled to join ANY political party he/she wishes INCLUDING the BNP and to attend political meetings etc. However they must not attend in uniform or indulge in behaviour that will bring the forces into disrespect. They must not attend marches or demonstrations or be involved in an official capacity with any political party."So to summarise this means that the BNP is now being treated like every other political party in the country as far as the Armed Forces are concerned.Today's Part One Orders are a GREAT step forward and has put us on an equal footing with the Conservatives, Labour and the Liberals. A lot of soldiers will breathe a sigh of relief and the positive impact this will have on the BNP's image among service personnel and their families is INCALCULABLE!!! Good news all round!"

To The Traitorous Politoco - Remember WHO we are!

2008-11-26T00:41:00.002Z

We will fight you to the bitter end and with our last breath we will spit in your faces for the traitors you are. WE ARE THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY and THE VOICE OF THE TRUE BRITISH PEOPLE.

We will fight in the towns and in the villages,and in the cities, we will fight in the valleys and on the hills, we will fight on the beaches and we will fight in the shires. And as time goes by we will become stronger, an unstoppable force against the three tier party system this country has become. We will fight through the ballot box, through street and internet activism - we shall never surrender. Our as yet unborn kin will look back in time and say "this was their finest hour". The Battle for Britain rages - Will YOU stand with the Thin Red Line?

Treatise on the EU

2008-11-26T00:15:00.003Z

An article by my good friend the Rev

The highest legal authority in the EC is the European Court of Justice sitting in Luxemburg. It has taken upon itself in its case law - whether legitimately from the treaties or not - to give effect to what it sees as the purpose of the treaties, rather than being governed by a strict reading of what the text of the treaties actually say. We have, here, a politicised law-making role for judges which offends the separation of powers. Judges are supposed to be impartial politically and to simply follow the text of any legal document. Gone is their political impartiality under an elected law-making body: They can now be regarded as a somewhat politicised judicial body, to teach us, magisterially, the spirit of the treaties. We have here echoes of the papal court which could depose both princes and parish presbyters; and which could dictate to everyone and ignore all, even national monarchs. Whatever the merits of a body such as this for furthering the goal of ‘ever closer union,’ a court of this kind is not the body to be entrusted with the protection of citizens’ rights and privileges; for the purpose of the treaty, its raison d’etat - ever closer union - trumps such things. If citizens’ rights get in the way of ‘ever closer union’ what will prevail in the eyes of the court?

Nothing could be worse, you would think, but the situation is compounded by the fact that the law-making powers of the Commission and Council, and the Court’s purposive or politicised approach to their interpretation, are deemed paramount - that is, they (in the view of the Court at least) override even the most basic laws of the Member States! The treaties are prudently silent on this point, as well they might be but the Court - in its case law - has explicitly asserted what the treaties may well have implied or rather disguised all along: a stupendous transfer of authority away from the citizens to a less than fully accountable combination of supranational and inter-governmental bodies above the constituent democratic States! It means that the court interpreting the disguised ‘purpose’ of the treaties - not explicitly set out in the treaties, of course - can legally undermine and change our national constitution and our most basic individual rights and freedoms! That is its view of its role and powers, at any rate, as expressed in its own case law. The highest English courts (the Court of Appeal and the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords) take a different view: In their views EC law, whether from the treaties or the case law of the European Court of Justice, is not in and of itself supreme over domestic law. EC law only takes precedence over English law by virtue of English law (the European Communities Act, 1972) lending them such precedence. The difference between EC supremacy and EC precedence is that the latter, being given by us, can be taken away by us if we repeal the delegating act. But the European Court of Justice says that its priority in England is due not to a delegating act of Parliament but to its own supremacy implied in the treaties - which, of course, if true, we cannot challenge without breaching the treaties and rebelling against them. This is a case of conflict of jurisdictions, not unlike the American civil war (1861-1865) as to who has the legal supremacy. One of the new factors in the EU Constitutional Treaty and in the Treaty of Lisbon is that, by treaty, EC (or EU) law would become expressly supreme - though even that would not operate in England without an Act of Parliament to begin with. Once such an Act were passed the legal waters would become more murky in allowing Parliament to repudiate what it has already acknowledged as supreme, and not merely having precedence here by our sufferance. We have, so far, not yet reached that stage - thanks to the Irish.

But we have already gotten a taste of the EC’s tyranny over our fishing rights and over British weights and measures. This is the thin end of the wedge: the European Arrest Warrant, the European Prosecutor, and the European Police Force (with the full diplomatic immunity from legal action of the EU’s supranational institutions) bode ill for a further erosion of civic freedoms. Any freedoms we may have left will then depend upon the unelected Court of politicised judges and the unelected Commission-Council meeting in secret conclave and able, between them, to make law by decree! Many have called this the ‘democratic deficit’. But is this being a little too generous? Rodney Atkinson calls it the new Fascism. Gorbachev has already referred to the EC as the ‘new Soviet Union.’ Whatever you may think about electoral accountability the current EC is a far cry from what Heath and Wilson told us about a Common Market! We need to be aware of what this combination may produce in the future - therein lies the danger both to us and to our posterity. Those who will not study and learn from history will surely repeat it. And Europe’s history has been one of absolutism as late as 1945 for Germany and 1992 for Russia. What is now going on in our name is surely a danger to us all; and the fact is that, whatever our party - as in the past, so now - we stand or fall as a Nation. Evaluating the European Community… … BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE!
To adapt the words of one Parliamentary motion, passed in the 1780s, against the Crown’s use of ‘patronage’ - money paid by the Government to influence how MPs would vote - we can say of the European Community that ‘...the influence of the EC has increased, is increasing and ought to be diminished’. The power of the EC institutions are now a creeping threat to civil liberties, the democratic rule of law, and popular participation in politics. The danger, comes in the following ways.

To begin with the European Community in its founding treaties did not recognise, and was not built upon, the basic principles of good government. These are, fundamentally, the substantial separation of the powers, functions, and personnel of the three branches of government with checks and balances between them, to stop the abuse of power by government and so ensure the liberty of the subject. In the 18th century the French philosopher, Montesquieu (1689-1755), outlined these powers as: the executive to make policies and carry on the business of government; a separate elected legislature to make the laws to which the government itself would be subject; and an independent and politically impartial judiciary to apply those laws equally to all. These are the principles of good government which first put in check absolutism on the continent, and then finally defeated it - absolutism being the opposite to government ‘...by the people, for the people, and of the people.’ These principles of good government are what the unwritten British constitution is grounded upon, although government in Britain is drawn from the elected legislature (the House of Commons) and is in effect an emanation of the majority party within that body. Nonetheless the government cannot generally make, or unmake, law: its proposals (known as Bills) have to first run the gauntlet of the elected Commons and the revising chamber of the House of Lords; and though many of the Lords are appointed, they are independent of the Government inasmuch as they are not dismissible by them. But, since 1957, absolutism has been oozing back into Europe not so much through the Member States of the European Community - which are all required by the EC to be democratic - but through the supranational and inter-governmental institutions of the European Community that its Member States - by treaty and by laws - have put both themselves and their citizens under.

The European Community’s framework of government (its informal constitution, not to be confused with the proposed formal Constitution rejected by voters in 2006) is laid out in various treaties signed by the Member States since 1957 as interpreted by the European Court of Justice in Luxembourg - itself a creation of those treaties. That framework of governance, spread over a patchwork of treaties, is extremely complex and confusing to the uninitiated; and amounts to both an ambush and a trap for the unwary who have been sweetened into it - as has happened both with the populations and many of the politicians. But to the initiated its pattern, its purpose and intent, was always clear. From the start its purpose was to foist, in an undemocratic way, an undemocratic scheme of government upon us; and to do it in a deceptive way. At every step on the road to European integration an illusion of democracy would be maintained whilst its real power would be bled away. As Jean Monnet (1888-1979), one of the inspirers of the European Community, said, ‘Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their peoples understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.’ But what is unaccountable at its inception is doubly so, even trebly so, at its completion. A deceived democracy is no democracy at all. This is the great danger.

One of the main organs of EC government is the Council of the European Union, better known as the Council of Ministers. It is an inter-governmental body whose members are appointed and recallable by the governments of the Member States. It is therefore in some sense an instrument of the top politicians of the Member States and accountable to them but, in another sense, it is also above them if it can make a decision by unanimity or majority or qualified majority voting. But as well as being the chief executive body of the Community it is also the chief law-making body binding not just governments but citizens. Yet it is not elected by the public nor dismissible by them; it meets in secret; and, as it also controls the reins of policy, it thereby combines both the executive and legislative functions with secrecy! Montesquieu’s advice has been stood on its head! Council members are neither openly nor effectively accountable to their national Parliaments for the decisions they make in Council. On such a body they are immune; and such a body is collectively immune to make laws which the people do not want. Even our own Cabinet cannot do this: their proposals have to face the scrutiny of parliamentary opposition and the searchlight of public debate and accountability. And rightly so, for this is the very essence of democracy. However, unlike the British Cabinet, the Council of Ministers cannot propose new laws; it can only respond to legislative proposals put to it by another body, the Commission. It then becomes crucial to inquire as to whether the Commission is more electorally accountable to the ordinary people or no since its proposals, if passed by the Council, will bind us - our governments and our elected representatives.

The EC Commission has the task to draft new proposals to become law. The Council of Ministers can only pass or reject such proposals; it cannot amend them. So the Council which is so powerful towards ordinary mortals is beholden to the Commission. But the Commissioners are neither elected nor re-callable by the people either. They are appointed by the heads of government of the Member States but they are not dismissible by them. This in effect makes the Commissioners a high body independent of the electorates, the governments, the national parliaments, and the Council; and yet it has the chief power to formulate new law proposals which, if passed by the Council, will bind the governments, the elected parliaments and the people. The law-making process in the European Community is hardly democratic. Moreover under the treaties the Commission can only make proposals in one direction - ‘ever growing union’. The ship cannot turn-around. Though the Council can bring the movement in that direction to a stop, neither the Council nor the Commission can turn the ship around, whatever they or the peoples may think or wish - so much for popular sovereignty and flexibility. In addition the Commission is in effect a supranational body independent of and - like the Council - in some sense above the governments; it has the power to drag Member States before the European Court of Justice to ensure that they obey the law of the new empire. It also negotiates trade agreements with other States and the terms of accession for new applicants. Lastly the Commission draws up the yearly budget which is so bad in accountancy terms that it has not been passed by any professional auditor for several years. In all these roles this high unelected Commission is served by a very large bureaucracy paid for by taxes allocated to it from the populations of the Member States.

But what of the European Parliament which meets in both Brussels and Strassburg? This is mainly a consultative assembly and not a legislature at all. It is more akin to the powerless Dumas and Reichstags of the absolute monarchies of Europe before World War One. Its title as a ‘Parliament’ is a misnomer, obliquely intended to mislead us into thinking that the institutions of the EC are democratic when they are not. It is certainly elected, and accountable, to the electorate of the EC; but what democratic good is that if it cannot effectively hold the Council or Commission to account on their behalf; and does not have the power to make and unmake laws, as the agent the people, elected and accountable to them. Recently, the ‘Parliament’s’ powers have increased to the point where it has some input on law-making but this is a minor rather than a crucial and decisive input. The democratic deficit therefore remains, which means that the EC, though it is made up of democracies, is not itself democratic; and yet it is above its constituent democracies, thus nullifying their democratic effect in areas of its competence.

We have thus discussed both the legislative and the executive processes, in this new and grandiose entity, and have found that it has an independence beyond the control of the people; which ought to make any wise man (or woman) tremble, even though its powers and competences are for the present limited. Yet, given the power of the law over every citizen, what are we to make of its judicial processes? Here the picture is, we fear, as dark and foreboding; not so much in the powers that the EC’s legal system currently exercises, though these are growing, as in the principles upon which these powers are exercised; principles which lay down a route to destroy all the legal safeguards for their citizens which, over centuries, the Member States have built up.

The List - Update

2008-11-25T23:05:00.005Z

Well only one phone call since my last list update post - i expect they are waiting for their Giros to arrive. Since my email was published i have apparently won over 21 million on various lotterys (and i havent given up my day job as a cleaner!), can have a larger manhood/cheap niagra (had to watch the spelling there - wouldnt want to be thought a racist..........)/alerts from HSBC,Barclays etc right through to the Royal Bank of Jims Ice House in Nova Scotia (the only one i ACTUALLY have an account with......). I can forget all my troubles if i click here or be taller if i click there.........

So - i clicked em all and now and now i am a 6 foot 6 inch homeowner with a degree, a blackbelt, 4 cars in the drive, im irresistable to women and have £20 million in the bank. Wow - my lifes changed massively since the publication of the list! But you know what? Im STILL BNP!!!!

Support the BNP! - YOU know it makes sense!

Whitemoor Prison

2008-11-25T22:29:00.002Z

On the BNP website there is a story about the large amount of public money that was used to buy in takeaways for muslim terrorist prisoners. Its an interesting story in itself. However in my mind this is a more serious matter. An aquaintance of mine works in the prison. He has told me on several occcasions that the biggest problem they have there is the forcible conversion of ordinary (white christian - even if only nominally) prisoners to Islam, along with a lack of will by the authorities to stamp down on them. The figures i give here are his ESTIMATES. From what i understand was initially a Moslem prison population of around 40, this has increased to around 150 (about a third of the inmates, with 90% being forcible conversions. The prison authorities are well aware of what is happening and are apparently in the process of trying to farm out the ringleaders of the gangs which are terrorising "normal" prisoners - remember this a Cat A prison with a smattering of Cat Bs. However due to an unwillingness to upset the ethnics and the mozzies invoking the "human rights" act they have been, so far, unsuccessful. The mainstream press (the Mirror, of all papers) has stated that only 8 moslems are in whitemoor due to terrorist offences BUT remember Whitemoor will not take any prisoners with a sentence of less than FOUR years, which under this marxist government is rarely handed out except for instances of extreme violence. Personally i think all the inmates at Whitemoor are scum but the forced Islamification of any inmate is a matter for concern in our land.

Racism Cuts Both Ways

2008-11-23T20:36:00.001Z

Excellent link with all the facts and good music.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKcA_R03Fdk

Our Peoples Defence Fund

2008-11-23T17:02:00.003Z

This is courtesy of the BNP website (link on left). Nick Griffins appeal for the defence fund for the battle now raging. You can donate through the BNP site.

Thousands of ordinary men and women like you across this land are being subjected to the most sustained and vicious political witch-hunt ever seen in this country. Their ‘crime’? Being concerned enough about the future of their country to join the British National Party!

Experienced political commentators from around the world have been shocked by the bigoted actions and biased reporting of our press. Independent observers such as leading libertarian Dr. Sean Gabb are comparing the onslaught launched against us to the political witch hunts in the early days of the Soviet and Nazi regimes. Others are comparing the campaign against BNP members to the ‘KRISTALNACHT’ pogrom against the Jews in 1930s Nazi Germany - and with good reason.

Remember, first the Jews were publically named, then they were barred from certain occupations, the press then tried to whip up hatred against them and their rights to express themselves politically were removed. Finally it was open season on them and anybody else who dared question the totalitarian political elite. Windows were smashed, firebombs were thrown, and innocent people were hauled off to prison.

Is this not exactly what we are witnessing now, here in Britain, in 2008? The leaking of our members’ details was not the mere rash action of a disgruntled ex- employee. No! It is part of a co-ordinated campaign to stop our progress and rapid growth. The Powers That Be know that we stand a good chance of winning European seats next June, and that they have lost the battle to stop us politically, so now they are turning to intimidation, violence and mass arrests.

You see, the British National Party is gaining widespread recognition as the only party that could ever pull this nation together, the others have failed and now millions of ordinary Britons are looking towards the BNP as their only hope. The Establishment know that we are close to a massive political breakthrough.

This is too much for the ‘Troughminster’ politicians, and that is why they have unleashed the attack dogs of the media and the legions of the PC fanatics, trade union Marxists and every other hater of Britain they can muster.

Shame of leftist bullies

Yes, the attacks are hurting many good people, and yes, the sensationalist press coverage, the late-night threatening phone calls and the hate letters have been a source of anxiety to many. One poor lady (not even a member) came home from her husband’s funeral last Friday to find death threats against him on her answer phone because he was ‘on the list’.

However, the enemies of this country have badly misjudged the British character and our famous fighting spirit. Are we not heirs of those who stood, against all odds, at Agincourt? Did not our forebears hold fast the ‘thin red line’ on every continent in the world? Were not our ancestors those bold heroes who stood at Tilbury dock with good Queen Bess against the assembled hordes of Europe, and served heroically with Nelson and Wellington?

Unlike our fathers and Grandfathers, we have no Somme, Paschendale or Dunkirk to test our metal, but none the less we have our own battles to fight and this is a major test for us as Nationalists and British democrats. If our courage fails at the first sound of battle, then all is lost.

Our Finest Hour?

But I believe that the indomitable British spirit now stirring within the hearts of our people will cause them to rise in defence of liberty and our proud British heritage. AS A PARTY, THIS COULD WELL BE OUR FINEST HOUR! Being ‘on the list’ is a mark of honour, and people are now clamouring to join and be on it too!

Down through the travails of centuries many have tried to bully and silence the British people. ALL HAVE FAILED. Our enemies have always made the mistake of confusing the British love of fair play, decency and peace with ‘weakness’. They never understood that this was the secret of our strength. It takes a lot to rile the British, but when we are stirred from our slumber there is no dictator, people or force on earth that can suppress our spirit.

We never went looking for this fight, but now it has started we must stand fast in defence of every single member who feels threatened, harassed or intimidated. Employers who attempt to victimise our people will be challenged in court. Newspapers that deliberately whip up hatred against our people will also find themselves on the wrong end not only of legal action for receiving and misusing stolen property, but of well-thought out actions denied to hit their owners in their pockets. Police forces that fail to protect our people, or even worse try to join in the intimidation, will be called to account too.

Our people ARE the Party; therefore we will vigorously pursue all and every unlawful attack upon any individual. Our members will be protected and defended and I ask you now to donate to our People’s Defence Fund in order to provide the necessary means to secure our people proper legal representation and protection as they require, and to allow us to go on the campaign offensive.

Preparing our counter- attack

I have already held two intensive conferences with heavyweight lawyers and with an expert in peaceful direct action. Over the first couple of days of this all-out assault on the BNP’s very existence, senior colleagues and I were together forced to work flat out on what, as you know, turned into a very effective defensive action in the media. Now it’s time for us to counter-attack!

As well as our coming legal fight-back, we’re going to be organising hard-hitting political action too. We’ll make Liverpool’s politically correct police bullies wish they’d never tried to stamp out the BNP. We’re designing new Truth Truck ‘skins’ and we’re going to visit the owners and big shareholders of the Daily Mirror and tell their neighbours about their vicious campaign of intimidation, lies and incitement. These swine started this fight, but we’re going to win it!

Helping defend democracy

The campaign of media demonisation, police repression and intimidation by gangs of leftist thugs mobilised and endorsed by Labour cabinet ministers is not just an attack on the British National Party. It is an attack on the very essence of our democratic system and British way of life.

If you value this country and want to protect your children’s future, do not let our people stand alone. The Last Battle for our country is now raging; will you do your duty and rally to the brave old colours of the red, white and blue?

What will YOU Do?

2008-11-22T23:57:00.003Z

The below article is from the Green Arrows site - a patriot i respect immensely - thanks GA.

Well what do you think will be the criminal states next act of oppression against the British National Party?

They arrest our members and detain them for long hours for giving out perfectly legal pamphlets.
They arrest our paper sellers and watch as they are attacked by the brain dead red.
They intercept our shipments of papers coming into the country.
They close down our bank account.
They deny us a voice on the so call topical programmes where they smear us but deny us a response.
They seek to expel us from our offices by threatening violence to the landlords of property.
They threaten the lives of the brave publicans who allow us the use of their premises.
They smear the good name of an excellent hotel for allowing us its use for our conference.
They sack people from their jobs because they are patriots.
They arrange the "theft" of our memberships list in order to pass it on to their paid thugs who are then instructed to carry out a nationwide campaign of intimidation and terror against those on the lists.
They encourage the use of stolen property to find more witches to burn.
So just what will they do next?

We have seen in just a few short weeks, how terrified they have become at the incredible growth of the British National Party. They have watched Nick Griffin in action, they have seen the courage of the heroic British National Party activists and they soil themselves in fear.

And I laugh when I hear their pathetic excuses as to why the True British People are joining us and becoming not just a member of a political party but a member of a family.

A family with real family values. A family that cares not just for themselves but for their Country and their children's future.

So they say we are being populist. A rich statement from crooked and corrupt politicians. They cannot see that the British National Party is espousing ideals, not to gain votes but because those ideals are simple truths. And these truths are now clear to more and more of the people.

The avalanche of political faith in the BNP by the people is starting to move.

I will not point out the crimes the New World Order have carried out against not just our people but our entire race. Those crimes are already known and for those crimes, they will surely pay.

No, I will refer back to an earlier post in which I asked if the BNP are the new Jews. I wrote half in jest at the time but no longer.

The BNP are the Jews to the new Nazis of the State.
The BNP are Snowball in Animal Farm.
The BNP are Winston Smith in 1984.
They hate us because we will not bow to them. They fear us because

We do not love Big Brother.
We bloody hate him.

If the Jews had know what their fate was to be when they boarded those cattle trucks during the time of terror they would have fought and died to the last man, woman and child.

But the Jews learned from history. Israel defends itself, even to the point of pre-emptively. They would not go quietly a second time.

And the BNP learns from history also and we say to the government. We are not the Jews who will go quietly to our end. We will fight you to the bitter end and with our last breath we will spit in your face. WE ARE THE BRITISH NATIONAL PARTY and THE VOICE OF THE TRUE BRITISH PEOPLE.

Now if you sit and read this whilst BNP activists sit in cells and whilst old women are phoned up at midnight and threatened. When doors are kicked in at dawn to arrest a person for leafleting and do not get enraged then you are not British and can go rot.

If you feel angry, now is the time to stand alongside those in the BNP who are currently doing your fighting for you.

If you think you are to old or unable to be an activist or member then do this. Give us your money. As much as you can spare. Help that way.

Leaflets cost money. Newspapers cost money. The Truth Truck costs money. Money is the gun we need to fire the bullets of truth at the corrupt crooks and paedophiles ruling over us.

God Bless the BNP

Linclonshire patriots Bit.

As a personal comment my mother is a party member, i introduced her to the BNP. She is now in her seventies and has been the subject of several late night calls. I rang her today to see if she was alright. Alright? Shes spitting feathers at both the establishment and the pissed up marxists who have tried to harrass her. My God, i would not like to be on the other end of the line if i was ringing her on the back of the list! God Bless you Mum!

My name on the list - so what?

2008-11-22T23:45:00.005Z

The tally so far.................3 abusive phone calls, one email and one call to my mobile plus one drunken sot in the street. Not bad - if id spent a whole night in the boozer in my local town it wouldve been about the same number = idiot wise. Im sleeping well and trust you are too!

United We Stand - Divided We Fall..............Stand Together!

The Stasi

2008-11-22T23:34:00.003Z

Eleven arrested activists, names and addresses "leaked" on to the net............

British people, which of you values the right to choose which political party they wish to associate with and which opinion they wish to hold as free men and women of our Island nation?

All of you, right?

In time this round of organised treachery will fade from the collective memory, boiled down to a headline which people vaguely remember, or not, just like all the other countless scandals our criminal establishment have been engaged in. Football, soaps and other assorted distractions, big and small, deliberate and otherwise, will move to the fore.

Yet we are in a mood of great defiance right now. Enquiries are coming in from former members who let their membership lapse and potential members who have seen this gross injustice, rightly, as a threat to them.

As such the British National Party would like to renew its calls for people to be involved. If you aren't a member, join the Party. If you are a member and are inactive it is time to become active. We urge you to contact your local or regional organiser and ask how you can help. Wherever you are there is a branch near you.

Soon we have critical elections for Europe, for county councils and possibly a general election as well. We always need leafleters, canvassers, candidates, researchers and contributors. If you have a skill, a trade or a talent but most of all a motivation to rescue our country from its slide into a cultural and political abyss...

We need YOU... RIGHT NOW...

First they came for the BNP members and I said nothing... then they came for me...

Yours Sincerely,
A. Patriot

JOIN THE BNP NOW AND HELP SAVE BRITAIN FROM THE SLIDE INTO THIRD WORLD MAYHEM - FIGHT OR LOSE IT!

Britains Shieldwall

2008-11-21T22:59:00.012Z

Twelve thousand bravehearts. This is the core of our countrys defenders and its future. Britains Shieldwall. Ally these stout hearted individuals to the growing levels of public support and votes and we move another few solid steps along the tunnel. Theres a sense of common purpose within the BNP. We are not empty inside - we have plans for the future of our children and our childrens children, not the instant gratification of the individual here and now and damn tommorow! Its a long walk and we may not see the full results in our lifetimes, but we had to start somewhere and we, my friends, are the vanguard.
We all know that theres right and theres wrong and you have got do do one or the other. - Hit a lick against whats wrong and say a word for whats right even tho you may get walloped for saying it. Do one and you are living, do the other and you may be walking around - but youre as dead as a dodo inside.
Nobody just decides to join the BNP - its forced upon you when you have had enough of the lies and deceits of the main parties and decide to stand up for yourself and for your country. When you have ideas like real freedom and rights of the individual, and a hatred of dictators. Fighting for our people to live free means more to us than cowering in "security". This is why we will win. Dirty tricks campaigns cause us a few casualties and some folk fall by the wayside. But their time with us helped us along the path, and new blood swells our ranks.

Stand firm, hold the line and we will win!

Knuckle Dragger - me?

2008-11-21T17:45:00.005Z

"Yure a F****** druckle nagger!" hissed the voice.
"Just slur that again?" i replied, chuckling at the semi upright piece of humanity as he lurched to hold on to his can of super strength lager.
" Bloody nugger draggle thats wot you are mate" he said.
Laughing i picked my fists off the ground and walked on.

Must have been the copy of the Sun he had that gave him the wit to outsmart me in the debate....................:)

Part II

2008-11-21T00:00:00.005Z

Cry "God for Harry! England and Saint George!".
The hair-raising battle cry of Henry V extolling his countrymen into the breech at the siege of Harfleur against the French in William Shakespeares Henry V. My fellow nationalist blogger The Green Arrow (link on left) has regularly called for a crusade against the forces of darkness that are arrayed against the freeborn British people of this land. The Free English people are stirring again, waking from the sleep that the country has been in for the last decades of marxist rule.

Our lands have been traded piece by piece by our traitorous politicians to the power-mongers of the EU, the ever more fervent demands of the Muslim jihadists in our midst,and they have encouraged morally bankrupt narcissitic lifestyles and the have now - pay later consumer culture that we are led to believe will bring us contentment, if not happiness. Its gone BUST people. All of these issues are a threat to our well-being as a nation of free people. The modern crusaders, the defenders of our homeland, are the BNP. The British National Party, outnumbered, outgunned, and with a hostile media attacking us almost daily, stand firm in our defence of the Free British People. The future of Britain is the BNP and is in your hands! Join, support and vote for the BNP in the 2009 elections. Fight for your freedom, have some guts, and stand up for yourself! This is no time for armchair warriors, but a time to make a stand - stand up for yourself, your children and your childrens children! They will thank you for it in the long run. If you are not prepared to join the New Crusade then yes, youll live, but you will live under the yoke of ever more oppressive legislation, sharia law as they push and push towards an islamic state in our homeland ,and you will gain the status of a second class citizen in your own homeland. Fight, and we MAY lose - but we will go down fighting, not grovelling, not scared to speak out and in the knowledge of knowing who we are! BUT we can win, and winning changes all the rules! Our country back to safe and secure borders, a country with a first class health and education system for all OUR people. So i urge each and every one of you to rally to the new crusade and support the BNP in the defence of this sceptred isle!

Once more into the breech! Once more into the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. Cry "God for Harry!, England and St.George!"

William Shakespeare"And gentlemen in England now abed shall think themselves accursed they were not here, And hold their manhoods cheap while any speaks that fought with us upon Saint Crispin'

Will YOU help our people and our homeland? Vote BNP in 2009!

Celebrating "diversity" - Notting Hill 2008

2008-11-20T23:42:00.003Z

Dont you just love it? I dont recall seeing this is my daily paper, i wonder why?

The Notting Hill Carnival, meant to be a “showcase of Britain’s immigrant community and diversity,” ended this year (again) in carnage and bloody street battles between police and black gangs, which resulted in at least 488 arrests.

Some 11,000 police officers were deployed at the event, costing taxpayers £6 million. They were attacked, glassed, pelted with missiles and confronted all day with everything from knife wielding black hoodlums and drunks, to dangerous dogs. Knives, a Taser gun, CS spray and a baseball bat were among the weapons seized during the rioting which followed the end of the carnival, billed as Europe’s largest “celebration of Afro-Caribbean culture.”

A total of 488 arrests were made during the event — 330 in the Notting Hill area and 158 around Oval, where police prevented about 160 black youths from south London entering the main carnival area.

Officers bussed 151 of them to south London police stations where they were detained until the carnival was over. Seven were arrested for possession of bladed articles or public order offences.
Police were battered near the centre of the carnival in Ladbroke Grove after 40 black youths attacked them in planned formations for two hours, pelting them with everything they could find, including bottles, bricks, steel bars and other objects. One officer was glassed in the face.
Backup had to be called in the form of fully armoured riot police, who baton-charged the black mob before order was restored.

Witnesses described a ‘war zone’. One witness said: “It was a full-scale riot. Bottles were flying everywhere. Carnival-goers and police officers were bloodied. A policewoman was carried off unconscious.”
“Another had a two-inch gash above his eye. He was staggering and supported by two colleagues. The mob weren’t scared. They were running towards the police who were chanting ‘one, two, three’ and charging them. It was like a war zone. I haven’t seen anything like it at the carnival since the early Nineties. It reminded me of the Brixton riots or the film Zulu.”

The 488 arrests were for offences ranging from assault, possessing an offensive weapon, drunk driving and theft, to public order and drugs. Even this figure is still being revised upwards.
Arrests for some of the more serious offences included: 59 for drug offences, 25 for carrying an offensive weapon, 40 public order offences, 18 for assault, 11 for theft, seven for drunken behaviour, two sexual offences and two for robbery.
Specialist dog liaison officers impounded 19 dogs under the Dangerous Dogs Act. Black gangs in London have increasingly taken to using dogs as attack weapons.
A teen was stabbed twice in the upper back after 10 to 12 youths chased him like a pack of animals in Clifford Gardens in the final hours of the carnival. The stabbed teenager had been chased by a gang of black youths just yards from where City lawyer Tom ap Rhys Price, 31, was stabbed to death in a robbery by black youths two years ago.
Melissa Johnson, 18, said: “I heard people screaming and swearing so I came outside. He was lying on the ground on his back with his head on the side. There was blood all on his face.”
Engineer Robert Dowdy, 40, said: “They chased him up the road like a pack of dogs, yelling and screaming. They were kicking and punching and swinging at him. There were two stab wounds on his upper back.”
Chief Inspector Jo Edwards praised ‘proactive policing’, including stop and search tactics, as authorities sought to avoid a repeat of the shootings and stabbings which had dogged previous years. Last year, two teenagers were shot, while two men were murdered in 2000, and memories of riots in 1976 linger.
Chief Inspector Edwards said: “The number of arrests is up on last year, but that is predominantly because of proactive policing.” Police used stop-and-search tactics throughout the carnival and metal detectors at tube station entry points to catch potential criminals.

Tory Traitor London Mayor Boris Johnson said: “As a former resident of Ladbroke Grove, I have watched the Notting Hill Carnival go from strength to strength each year to become an internationally acclaimed event. Nothing beats the sounds of the steel pans, the aroma of delicious Caribbean food and the dazzling colours of the costume parade.” (or the sound of steel on flesh presumably?)

What he didnt say was ANYTHING that was related to the above, the fact that the police only record crime at the Carnival on the main road (anything else is recorded as local crime even its within 20 feet of the main drag - so the realistically you could double the above numbers and still be on the light side). He also stated "as a former resident of...." - well i wouldnt want to live there either Boris, but some of us indigenous folk dont have a choice. Ho hum....................

Thankyou

2008-11-20T22:13:00.003Z

So, the membership list has been published online. Ive had two crank calls and one email (apart from the plethora of viagra type rubbish) . I have been out and about today and have recieved nothing but positive feeback from the people in the area. I have had several promises to vote for me if i decide to stand again ( i have) and a general consensus that the publication of the list has given us some good publicity. Personally i dont care that my details are online - i have nothing to be ashamed of and nothing to hide - im proud of the publicity (if it can be called that, as i am only one of the twelve thousand patriots with the strength to stand and be counted)

So if i have to put up with up some loser harrassing me (giros permitting - spookily enough the calls were after six o.clock, cheap rate, and not to my mobile, expensive) when their funds permit (and numbers witheld of course) then i consider it a cheap price for the opportunity to speak up on behalf of my kin and folk. Thankyou for boosting my determination!

Dont forget the 2009 elections are not too distant and the BNP needs every patriot to turn out and vote and not be discouraged by any campaigns against us such as we are currently seeing!

2009 is OUR year. VOTE BNP!

Our time is coming - Stand, Men of the West!

Leaked membership list

2008-11-19T18:11:00.002Z

I was going to write a few lines regarding the leaking and publiation of the membership list but these comments from another site say it all!

"That is not a members list it's a bloody role of honour because the people on that list actually want to save Britain and God Bless them one and all. Be proud to be BNP"

"List of the saints. To be on that list is to be on the list of heroes like Waterloo, Trafalgar, and the Battle of Britain. To be on the list is to be immortal. If the British People (as in US census code 011 British) last 12000 years it will be because of those on the list.These are individual heroes. They don't come to this in a group. They are not ordered to do it by government. They didn't get draft cards. Each person on the list has made a testament to truth on their own act of conscience. They have risked all for their kin, despite the ingratitude and hate shown by the official minders of PC. Many are with them. And the numbers are growing and not just in Britain. We are a great people and when we are united we can not be defeated. Churchill said it, and it has been true throughout history. When evil has marched it has been us who have stopped it for centuries. No other people can make this claim."

Makes me proud to be on that list.

Destroying Our Culture

2008-11-17T18:14:00.003Z

Thanks to Mr Fox and The Green Arrow for this.

By Mister Fox -One of the weapons used to destroy our young people is what is known as the “Culture Wars.” Modern, popular music transmits raw uninhibited energy, emotion and excitement often with catchy tunes but is negative and corruptive. Those who doubt this should listen to, say, “Heavy Metal” or “Rap” then perhaps some Tudor church music and compare the feelings and images that are aroused. The first produce the desire to hurt or mistreat others, the second, an uplifting spiritual sense and a good feeling towards God and others.The state of a civilisation can be assessed by its art. There are deep similarities between our collapsing civilisation and the collapse of Greece and Rome and we need to use their historical example as guides to correcting our own folly. The modern manipulators are leading us into degeneracy through popular culture.In a recent TV series "I'm a Celebrity Get Me out of Here", simple people, described as Celebrities, were so degraded as to eat live worms and stick insects.
Rebecca Loos masturbates pig for your "entertainment" There are several levels to this: there is cruelty to lesser animals; encouraging children to eat insects and slugs in the garden and the decline into more degradation of our people and culture. On a “reality” programme one masturbated a pig and on another one fried and ate Kangaroos testicles. This is to degrade our people and culture.Many think that the presentation of certain “lifestyles” in T.V. programmes is innocent, but they are arranged and presented to be sympathetic and thus to change people’s attitudes which is social engineering. The Soaps are used to promote “gay” lifestyles.This does not happen by serendipity. It is planned in meetings. The “Goodies” are shown sympathetically and glamorously, every character they want us to imitate is attractive and cool; the “Baddies”, those they want us to hate, are thick and unlovable. It does not occur in a vacuum but in tandem with other developments and helps to manipulate acceptance for the Government plans to equalise the sexual marriage laws.Contemporary art is used to degrade us by destroying any notion of the Sacred needs of people. Every year these time-warped artists stage a ritual by setting up an ordinary member of the public. The script is this: an elderly person takes a youngster, say grandchild or niece, to an exhibition and is shocked by something on display, like an unmade bed or something that requires little imagination, and complains to the press. Then the curator is quoted as saying, “Art is to make people think, and to provoke feelings”. This hackneyed response has been used on each occasion for the last 30 years.I once went to the Ikon gallery in Birmingham, which is financed by taxpayers’ money confiscated by the Government as well as funding by companies. The young gulls there soon refused to speak to me when I explained they are mass produced artists all doing similar stuff. They have to do what the Art Council wants to get a grant. The liberal middle classes follow the tastes and standards set by elites such as Saatchi.At the beginning of the twentieth century the modernist movement set about destroying the form and grammar of traditional art and thus the content, and made it both unintelligible and uninteresting. In the 60’s cultural Marxists of the new left became the "elites". They hate our culture and traditions and are destroying our young people.Aristocrat rulers had sense of “noblesse oblige" towards the working classes and a sense of responsibility but the elites, who grew out of the new left, corrupt them out of hatred and personal gain.The Discrimination Act of 1975 advises people not to use degrading language of certain selected groups. But our elites continually degrade working-class people and our young. They mock them as “Chavs.”Our people rarely see themselves affirmed in adverts or on TV, only dark people without English features unless they are advertising our women to the world as whores. We are not supposed to identify with ourselves. The elites need have no conscience about bringing immigrants here to take our jobs by undercutting wages and pushing us out of our communities if they convince themselves we are worthless.The television programme makers are on the lookout for something to laugh at but we are now the targets and this is done to us before the rest of the world. It is conveyed by images as well as words which are read as body language and semi-conscious messages.Whites are presented as fat, over weight, while ethics are bright and clean. A television programme “How clean is Your House” has two women visit inadequate parents to tell them how to bring their children up. They select lower class inadequates but never tell an inadequate Muslim couple how to bring their children up.One of these programmes is shown in 47 countries! This sends the message to potential asylum seekers that we are inadequate and weak and they can come here and everything off us including our women.What are the effects of this constant debilitation of our people by the elites on everyday life? Ordinary people lose contact with our civilization and become disorientated, lost, suffer from bereavement and become depressed.Our culture is still amenable to the elites but our manipulated young and those from a de-culturalised background give up and do not bother. They cannot take refuge in a smaller cultural world like the elites who live in large houses in posh areas of London, or beautiful English villages as country gentlefolk. They lose heart and, having nowhere to go descend into vices and viciousness; they are no longer civilized and do not know how to behave. They become prey to amoral meritocrats who use and exploit them.
Amy Winehouse. Role model for our young women The papers devote pages to the drugged and drunken antics of “celebs” and footballers while the celeb magazines and radio stations promote those who have degraded themselves on Reality TV shows. They show them leaving night clubs drunk and question whether they are wearing knickers or not. The people who make these programmes and write the magazines are educated and intelligent people so they know what they are doing to our young people.It is to redress the balance with the behaviour of ethnic communities. I looked at the covers of two celeb magazines: one stated, “Posh is looking tired and stressed. Is it too much partying?” The other, “Britney and Paris’ wild night out.”We are being deprived of self worth and seeking it in drink and drugs. There is a trend in drinking amongst people as young as 10 -15. We see them all over the country in subways, on recreation grounds, schoolchildren drinking cans that they have been sold by shopkeepers.Our young people do not understand their loss of identity, the loss of the sense of who they are and loss of self-worth. What are the consequences? The degradation shows in their social lives when they try to escape from themselves.
"Yes Mum. We had a lovely night." A 20 year-old young woman told me how she and her cousin go on. “We were so drunk,” she said beaming, “we were “so drunk we couldn’t stand.” They could not remember how they got home. I asked if they like getting drunk. “It’s social” one replied; the other ”It’s good fun.” “It is acceptable now like sex and dress.”Some politicians claim stopping “Happy Hours” would stop drunkenness but there are ways of getting drunk quickly and cheaply like “drinking glasses of water while drinking alcohol because it reacts in your blood and you get drunk quicker.” There is also a trick of gulping air down while you drink. I asked who originates these tricks. “Probably, the breweries”, she replied.Though they have been educated to see themselves as equal to men but in practice women’s vital organs are not as strong as men’s and they have a greater chance of liver and kidney damage as well as permanent brain damage.Children are selfish, but become civilized as they grow older and take responsibility for the world around them. This is becoming adult. However, the new culture prevents them from growing up and keeps them immature which is causing so much uncivilised behaviour. Bar owners and the drinks companies play on the weaker part of people’s nature rather like a sales scam would play on, say, someone’s greed. It is preying on the young’s need for fun and adventure with unhealthy adventures.Young people drink drinks that have pretty colours and fruity flavours like soft drinks but are about 6% alcohol, or pretty, pleasant tasting cocktails. At the same time the hypnotic music pounds away disorientating them. There are often TV screens all around showing sport, pop acts or models on catwalks. This bar had a couple of bouncy castles upon which customers bounced gleefully, mindless that outside their bubbles of pleasure there is a dangerous, hostile world. Recent bomb attacks were outside London nightclubs. A cool bar is unreal and like being in a dream. There is also the use of the hallucinatory effects of drugs in adverts. I saw an advert for vodka shots, which was a square of undulating shades of blue light. You do not see these colours by drinking vodka, gulps of air or not. You see this by taking ecstasy.On a normal evening in every town and city you see young women collapsed on the pavements usually being attended by paramedics and stretchered away comatose or with cracked heads. Is that all our young women are worth? They walk up to cars waiting at traffic lights and ask for lifts and often just open the door and get in. You see them staggering around the streets at 2 to 4 am lobbing their boobs out to stop passing cars for lifts. They are perfect victims for ethnics and asylum seekers who drive up and down the entertainment streets imitating private hire cars.
No wonder others have no respect for our womenwhen they have none for themselves People from other countries and ethnic groups have no respect for our corrupted women who they see as only good for one thing. Many are raped every weekend and not know it or who by, as they usually cannot remember how they got home. Later, they might want an abortion or find they are HIV-Positive!This preying on our degraded women came out recently when The Sun of 14 Nov 2008 reported than an illegal immigrant with HIV is feared to have infected hundreds of women in a massive health scandal, it emerged yesterday. The Jamaican man used hospital patients unmonitored for nearly a year preying on vulnerable patients for sex. The health authorities have now written to 420 women warning they may have been infected with the killer virus! The man is not being named but kept secret. He came here in 2002 on a visitor’s visa. He has slept with dozens of girls after searching nightclubs in Leicester.The Times of August 11 2007 reported on “growing concern" at the attitudes of some Asian men towards white girls which campaigners for women claim few people wish to address. Parents have complained that in parts of the country with large Asian communities white girls as young as 12 are being targeted for sex by older Asian men yet the authorities are unwilling to act because of fears of being labelled racist.Ann Cryer, a Labour member of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee, has been at the forefront of attempting to tackle the problem after receiving complaints from mothers in her constituency about young Asian men targeting their under-age daughters.Although campaigners claim that hundreds of young girls are already being passed around men within the Asian community for sex, she said that attempts to raise the problem with community leaders had met with little success, with most of them being in a state of denial about it.Pop stars are arbiters of taste and behaviour and must take personal responsibility for the harm they have done to young people by creating degenerate images to make themselves millions. Young people identify with them and are beguiled by their rebellious and exciting images while in reality they live in mansions, employ gardeners, maids, cooks and butlers and send their children to the best schools.The man who destroyed old America, and undermined the western world Elvis Presley has a religious devotion 30 years after his death and his home Gracelands attracts worshippers on the scale of Lourdes or Mecca.These pop idols have replaced religious and national icons for millions of people. They are hypocrites who pose to corrupt and make money. Madonna in real life tried to live as an English country lady while in public she pretends to be a rebel effing and blinding and snogging Britney at award ceremonies. This degraded old thing is no longer influential but did a lot of harm especially by promoting S&M.On internet “Social Networking” sites for young people to meet others our young women present themselves as tarts and most say they “like getting drunk.” Their clothes and poses show them as anybody’s meat. They are imitating people on TV. talent shows and think they will be spotted, and slappers who have made fortunes showing their silicon boobs.Our elites promote these as role models for our young people, but only promote honourable and worthy people as role models for ethnic minorities. If you walk around an inner city school or community centre the walls are festooned with heroes from the histories of ethnic groups like Gandhi, Marcus Garvey or Harriet Tubman.On an entertainment street some bars are used for pills and others for cocaine and most door staff are pumped up on steroids. The drug goes with the music. The coke-heads are hyper and constantly making a sort of chewing motion. The staff of these bars put Vaseline on lavatory cisterns to try to stop customers doing lines of coke on them but the owners are usually on it themselves and door staff are often dealers.Another mode of destruction is Clubbing on Ecstasy. It is a special occasion like going to church on Sundays.There is an unfinished part of us that is reaching out to become satisfied or whole and this gives a temporary and artificial substitute. A common feature of ecstasy clubbers is a need to escape from themselves which in a healthier age would have led to a mystic journey in solitude as eremites counting their beads and communing with God. In our degraded times they are prey for the hard-headed business people who use any fashion to make money out of their own people.A young woman explained to me: “It heightens the music, makes it more epic.” In common with others it helps them to dance longer, but the important effect is that “It fills you full of love towards those around you, if a girl is being sick in the toilets you pull her hair back for her. I have only seen two fights in eight years of clubbing.” She compared this with aggressive pubs when people are drunk and violent fights ensue. It is a response to the betrayal of the needs of our young people by our Christian leaders and has fuelled artificial communities and the illusion of transcendence through drugs.The importation of cheap labour is justified by blaming us: “Eastern European Workers Shame Lazy Brits” scream the tabloids. It is incredible but the Labour Government and Trades Unions have virtually re-introduced Slavery as those encouraged here but classified as illegal immigrants work for almost nothing.On top of asylum seekers and families and spouses coming here, eastern European immigration makes a total of 1,000,000 per annum. Nurse graduates for example cannot find jobs.The elites see only good in ethics but find fault in us. They pretend they are “essentially good,” while we are essentially bad. Unfortunately many immigrants keep letting them down by shooting and knifing people, grooming our young girls and planting bombs.The one who brought totalitarianism and oppression into our legal system with the Campaign for Racial Equality, in the 1976 Community Relations Act, was Roy Jenkins. Biographer, John Campbell (Weidenfield & Nicolson.1983) tells us, that he believed, “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it." Commonwealth immigrants like previous waves of immigrants from the Norman Conquest, to the refugees of the 30’s, could help overcome “our natural Island lethargy”.The practice has been our degradation. We need to re-introduce grammar Schools or even found new public schools to impart traditional values like honour, duty and service; others must consider Home Schooling networks to give our young the standard of education the state schools are denying them and to instill self-worth and a sense of belonging instead of teaching them to give up their country to outsiders and to become sexual perverts.We must revive local fairs and festivals and develop our Folk music traditions by taking traditional forms but using modern words and situations for the present time to express our sufferings under the elites. These are not rationalist formulae but suggestions for our creative young people to develop in practice. They will be able to forge natural, emotional bonds with their own people, their traditions and civilisation. Thank you and thank you Mister Fox.
Tags: Mister Fox

Britannia - God Bless Her

2008-01-31T18:55:00.000Z

Gordon Brown has once again shown his real colours by approving the removal of Britannia from the 50 pence coin. Britannia is the symbol which many people believe is based upon a Roman goddess but in fact the symbol has a heritage that goes much further back than that. The name Britan, or Bridget as the name is now known was an ancient goddess of nature and Annia was an ancient goddess of love or fertility. The symbol has featured on British coins for 300 years, and the redesign by Royal Mint will be the first time in hundreds of years that she has not featured on any British coinage. All British coins will be changed shortly, with traditional images replaced by things representing "modern Britain" (I expect to see all sorts of images which are NOT British, NOT traditional and certainly NOT aimed towards celebrating any remaining vestiges of our fast dissappearing British Culture) . The traitor Brown has repeatedly claimed, since taking over from the war criminal Blair, that he is above all "patriotic". This is a lie which was exposed when it was discovered that he approved the removal of Britannia whilst he was still Chancellor. As well the image of Britannia, the crowned lion and chained portcullis found on some coins will disappear. From 1797 to 1970 she featured on the one penny coin before being moved to the fifty pence coin.Once again the traitor Brown, who sold us out with his signature on the shackles known as the EU Constitution without giving the British public any say, has shown just how "patriotic" he really is! If i wasnt already a member this is the sort of thing would drive me towards the BNP!

Fine "British" Citizens

2008-01-23T17:26:00.000Z

This from the press:

Two British teenage girls have been sentenced to nine months in prison for trying to smuggle cocaine out of Ghana in laptop bags.
Yasemin Vatansever and Yatunde Diya, both 16, were sentenced by a court in the capital, Accra.
Because they have been in prison since first being arrested last July they have less than three months of the sentence to complete.
The girls, from London, were held on July 2 at Accra's airport after anti-drugs officers found 13lbs of cocaine in two laptop bags they were carrying as they boarded a flight to Britain.
A spokesman for the Ghana narcotics board said the girls will be released on April 18.
He added: "The girls get a second chance not to repeat what they did. The message is clear to everybody. Once you do it and get caught you will pay for it."
He said they will serve the remainder of their sentences at a juvenile detention centre in Accra.
Asked if the girls might be sent home to England to serve out their time, a British High Commission spokesman said such a move would not make sense.
"The crime was committed here, the trial was held here, and that's it," he said.
The head of the girls' legal team had previously said they planned to appeal against the conviction.

Well excuse me if i appear a little underwhelmed by the sentence. Nine months for 13 pounds of drugs and i think we are soft here! With fine English names such as these drug smugglers have i wonder if the British authorities will check on their return to see if the girls are imports to our country? - if so, will they be deported? This governing junta of ours always cease to amaze me and will no doubt do so on this occassion too.

It has been pointed out to me that if what they had was "pure" cocaine you could be looking at dealers here in the uk "cutting" it by a factor of 10 to 20 in this country. So their 13lbs becomes at least 130lbs. Now if you sell at on the street at between £40 and £50 per gram you see that you are looking at half a million if it could not be cut or several million if it could.

Respect!

2007-12-14T18:18:00.000Z

It's a shame Great Britain ( or are we now Region 8 since the traitor Brown signed away another chunk of our right to self rule?) doesn't have a Prime minister like this, we might not get dragged into so many problems. If anybody has Gordon Browns email, please feel free to pass it on. I know the speech is a bit out of date, but is inspirational none the less. Gordon Brown or John Howard.......Gordon Brown or John Howard..........

The Free British People needs a leader like this!!

Prime Minister John Howard - Australia
Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on to get out of Australia , as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.

A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia and her Queen at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his Ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown. Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state, and its laws were made by parliament. 'If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you', he said on National Television ....

'I'd be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia : one the Australian law and another Islamic law that is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that's a better option', Costello said.

Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country. Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should clear off. 'Basically people who don't want to be Australians, and who don't want to live by Australian values and understand them, well then, they can basically clear off', he said.

Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques. Quote: 'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.'

'However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the 'politically correct' crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia . However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand. This idea of Australia being a multi-cultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. And as Australians, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle.

This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society . Learn the language!

Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.

We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.
If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don't like 'A Fair Go', then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. By all means, keep your culture, but do not force it on others.

This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom,'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.

If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU chose.'

Maybe if we had a leader with a backbone to start speaking and voicing the same truths we would not be in the situation we are currently in, being whinged at at the drop of a burka by some snivelling moslem, being bombed by people who have been educated, sheltered and welcomed by our politicians (but not the MAN on the street) and generally having a rare old time at our expense (and i do mean expense).

Treason!

2007-12-13T15:52:00.000Z

Gordon Brown and his band of marxists have today put another nail in the coffin of Great Britain. Without having the guts to go and put his own "X" on the "revised" EU Treaty, he sent one of his running dogs to put his paw print on instead. This man promised the Free British People a referendum on this constitution and he has reneged on this solemn oath. Brown is a man of no integrity, a traitor to his own people and how he has the audacity to continue to masquerade as a man for the people is beyond me. We have an opportunity in next years London elections to give this treasonous party a bloody nose. Vote for the BNP and start to reclaim your heritage. Not until we have a Nationalist government will we have the will to withdraw from the EU superstate, control our own borders and give priority to our own people.
Brown - You should hang your head in shame for this foul deed.

Are We A Mongrel race - HELL NO!

2007-12-10T21:35:00.000Z

I make no apologies for "re blogging" this article from last years blog. It should strike chords in all of us. Never forget our proud heritage - its what we leave for our children and our childrens childern. It is said we are a difficult people. To me this shows the true meaning of diversity - not the dressed up multicultural claptrap we are assailed with on a daily basis, but the REAL diversity of a people who are aware of their heritage, their culture and their roots.People who can still function as thinking individuals, and not the product of some marxist school of non-thought. Particularly at this time.

It has been said that the British are a mongrel race, that has neither the right nor the racial heritage needed to proclaim itself the land of a distinct people and that we have always had mass immigration throughout our history .

Nothing could be further from the truth.

Why is it important to establish the argument for a distinct people in the case of Britain and its history? It is important because without knowledge of our cultural and racial origins we are at risk of being demoralised when we are told that our people have no historical, cultural or racial core. It is true that Europe and Britain were settled long ago by Caucasian European tribes. It is true that as with all ancient formations of nations, the settling of lands, warfare and border disputes were indeed the norm. One cannot imagine that, as those Caucasian tribes struggled to settle and claim Britain , anything less than sporadic warfare and land disputes could have taken place. Such are the birth pains of any new nation in the ancient days when the un-tilled lands first felt the feet of the early British tribes. BUT – these tribes were all of common racial stock! So, why are we continually being told we are a "mongrel" nation made up of every hue and colour and creed under the sun? Because as I said a country and people with no sense of history, culture and self are divided and therefore easy pickings for the greedy politicians and their lickspittle sycophants that we have in power in Britain todayIt is said that the early British who settled this land were a disparate bunch of peoples who had nothing in common. The conclusions drawn from this argument will be that as Britain was settled by a variety of peoples (having nothing in common) that the peoples surely have no right to claim a natural racial ownership over the land or even to lay claim to the title," The British People".If you cannot lay claim to the right of being a people then you cannot defend the collective self from the argument that any and all foreign races should be allowed to cross the borders and subsequently to lay claim to the land even to the point of eradicating the culture of the British race. After all if a people are not recognised as a people, but only as a rag tag group of individuals with no common collective core, no rights to being known as a people then how can they insist that they have a unique culture to preserve and to protect? So we see the insidious nature of the argument which states that Britain is predominantly populated not by a people (the descendants of our forefathers who settled the land in ancient days), but by a myriad of races, having no common, ancient racial origin, which simply happened to have formed, in that which is now known as Britain.

COMMON BLOODLINES.
Actually the forefathers of the British race had everything in common as far as a common racial origin. Now some may argue against these conclusions, however those who would argue would most likely be the same individuals who would argue that the Swedes, the Norwegians and the Danes are very different in racial origin. This argument would be wrong and it would be to ignore the fact that these current nations were simply different parts of the same, huge Viking entity which once roamed the area as a whole tribe, but then split into nations over border warfare and disputes. It will amaze you when you realise just how much of a common racial bloodline the people who formed the British 'race' actually had. Let us look at the racial pattern we have set down for ourselves in history and you will see that we were once great Caucasian tribes. Britain was formed by the Caucasian race.It only takes a knowledge of history, (an untwisted account of history, one that is not tainted or twisted in word in order to present a false impression with which to demoralise a people), in order to quickly see that the facts of history lay out a very clear road map as to the common racial roots of those who formed Britain.Early settlersSo, who were the people who settled and created that which is now known as Britain and what did they have in common? What brought them together as a people? First off, the Celts were a tribe from the North of Europe. They were a northern tribe of Caucasians.Now let us look at the Normans. They were Vikings by race which means that they originated from a Northern European area thus they were a Northern tribe of Caucasians in origin. It is true that they mixed with the French in bloodline, but to argue that the French are not a distinct people just because the Vikings are a part of the French is as absurd as it is to argue that the British race does not exist just because we have had an influxes of settlers over the last two millenia. Let us look at the Danes. They were Vikings by race and thus a Northern European tribe. Let us look at the Picts. They were they were a Viking race (yes that does mean that they were at one time a Northern European tribe in origin) which intermarried with and were absorbed by the Scots who were speakers of the Irish (Gaelic) language.Let us look at the Saxons, the Jutes, the Angles, all people of northern or Germanic origin. Are you seeing the pattern? The Celtic peoples such as the Gaels, the Britons and the Belgae were much noted for being tall, blonde or red haired and blue eyed or light of eye. They were known for their tattooing. Picts or 'painted men' were known for their ferociousness in battle!Of course some British forefathers were shorter and some were taller and some were fair while some were pale and some a snowy white. Some had brunette hair and some white blonde or golden hues. We speak in general terms of the physical descriptions of the Viking races. Remember that Denmark and Sweden and Norway are all simply Viking tribes which broke apart as warfare and disputes broke out amongst them. They do not look identical and neither do you or i.Now, what pattern do we see in the forefathers of the British? We see that the people who settled Britain had a great deal in common when it comes to racial bloodlinesYes the Romans were in Britain just as they were once in France . It was in 55 and 54 BC, after Rome had conquered Gaul or as we call it now France that Gaius Julius Caesar decided that he needed to deploy troops to Britain to crush the British resistance. Is France not French because Rome was there? Is Britain not British because Rome was there? Of course this argument is ludicrous.Caesar was driven back from Britain when he met with fierce resistance from the free British peoples.After coming up against the fierce inhabitants of Britain a disgruntled Caesar decided it was best to return his troops to Gaul. Between 54BC and AD 43 trade links developed between Britain and Rome , but then Rome just had to try again and in AD 43 the Roman Emperor Claudius invaded Britain. He was met with a ferocious resistance by the indigenous British and could only conquer lowland England.The British were such a fierce people, such a proud people that even the might and glory of ancient Rome knew itself to be in serious peril when up against the British people. In AD 60 the Roman Suetonius Paulinus was campaigning in North Wales against the Druids, when a major anti Roman uprising was started by Boudicca who openly rebelled when her daughters were raped by roman occupiers.The major Roman settlements were destroyed in Britain before the uprising was defeated. Rome was now more certain than ever that Britons could be a terribly proud and fierce people when stirred, and if truth be told Rome never could conquer all of Britain. Highland scotland was never conquered by Rome and the areas of Britain which were conquered never would stay conquered. The British never did accept defeat. They simply would not stay down. In AD 409 the Imperial occupation of Britain came to an end.
Let us look at what the British took for themselves culturally from the days of the Roman occupation and we shall see how ancient Greece became an important part of the British people's culture. Whilst Roman empirical forces occupied warlike Britain , or shall we say "attempted" to occupy it? Remember that even the forces of the Roman Empire could never occupy or hold of all Britain . Many of the British incorporated much of the philosophical and educational ideology of Rome into their own lives.Now let us remember that much of Roman civilisation, culture, literature and art came almost entirely from ancient Greece. For example, no Roman of good family could have called himself truly cultured unless he was able to speak fluently in the Greek language and had a good knowledge of all Greek literature.The Celts likewise had made a strong impact in the collective Roman mind.We have already established the racial bloodline from where the British originated and all of this talk about the Romans and the Greeks is in regards to CULTURAL influences on the ancient British, not racial. It is also important to remember that the British ALREADY had their own arts and ideologies in place.They simply added, via ancient Rome, some of the best that ancient Greece had to offer by way of literature and philosophy, to their own vast Northern European, Celtic and Germanic based storehouse of knowledge.The Church became a major influence in Rome which became predominantly Christian by the year AD 200, and this added to the influence of the church as a major force in Britain.It was not until Elizabeth the First promoted and created the Church of England that the hold of Rome was lessened in matters of the Church in a permanent way in Britain. So we see that the racial heritage of Britain was culturally influenced by the old ways, by the philosophy and art of ancient Greece, by way of the Roman occupation which ended in Rome leaving Britain, but most of all by the legends and lore and culture of the ancient Northern European Caucasians from where the blood of the ancient British sprang.So yes – we have had waves of immigration over the centuries but in relatively small numbers, most who were assimilated into our culture and ALL were from the same racial stock. What we have had since 1948 with the arrival of the SS Windrush is an open door policy allowing people of any colour and culture to settle irrespective of numbers or culture or beliefs – nobody knows how many immigrants, illegal or otherwise are currently in our land. However the effects of this can be seen daily on our streets and in our schools and in our communities with race ghettos springing up and spates of anti-white attacks on our people –on our sons, and on our daughters, on our neighbours and on our friends. Taxes have increased to tyrannical levels and our freedom of speech is under direct threat from a government too cowardly to attack the problems but quite happy to betray their own people for the price of a vote. But we are the descendants of these proud and ancient British people, they never rolled over – we shouldnt either!

Welcome Back?..........

2007-11-14T18:29:00.000Z

Just a quick line to say to anyone who still drops in here that after a layoff of several months i would hope to resume postings in the next week or so.

"British" Moslems Burn Our Flag

2007-06-28T16:15:00.000Z

When will our people learn these moslems want our land and our lives - The link says it all. Join the BNP and help.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQLpG5b18pk

Nick Griffin - BNP Chairman on Radio 5 Live

2007-06-14T22:00:00.000Z

http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/mainframe.shtml?http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/aod/fivelive_aod.shtml?fivelive/morning_thu

Sat-Nav Captured - Osama On Foot.....................

2007-06-14T19:20:00.000Z

In a new development in the war in Afghanistan, American Forces today revealed how Osam Bin-Hidin has successfully eluded the forces hunting him. The americans stated "Osama has managed to keep three, i mean one, step ahead of us for years - with equipment like this its not hard to see why. Its dust-proof, weatherproof and can be operated in any cave in the world". The Taliban Taxi equipment that was seized is of a type said to be favoured by Osama himself, complete with "Hijab Hideaway" . (for getting thru allied checkpoints) and "As You Ride Prayer Mat" for the on-the-move-muslim as optional extras. The "Fatwa Tool Roll" with stones graded by size, as well as spanners, is currently under examination by american specialists.

Note: Initially the U.S. Special Forces team who captured the Taliban Put Put failed to recognise the Sat-Nav due to most Afghan Moslems still believing the world is flat, and the SEALs had thought it belonged to an irish tourist until the "extras" were identified.

Charter For Nonces

2007-06-11T16:18:00.001Z

Almost 8,000 sex offenders have escaped with a caution rather than being charged in the past five years, according to a report.

Among those were 1,600 offences involving children, 230 were for rape and 350 involved a victim under the age of 13. Responding to the report, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) insisted offenders were not being "let off", since the caution would still be noted on a criminal record and they would be entered on the sex offenders register. Who on earth do these idiots think they are kidding - they have been LET OFF!

Offences which attracted a caution included rape, child porn offences, bigamy, exploitation of prostitution, indecent exposure, sexual offences against animals, sexual grooming and incest.

Much of the information was obtained by using the Freedom of Information Act. Only one force, West Yorkshire Police, failed to provide figures, saying it would be too expensive to search for the results (yeah, - what with all those followers of the Dead Paedophile there, i bet it is!).
The ACPO said that before deciding whether to charge or caution, police would take into account the victim's views, age and welfare (and ethnicity?). Cautions would be given in circumstances where the victim of a rape did not turn up to give evidence at court (this is a complete lie - to need the witness to turn up in court the pervert must have been charged and had a date set for their appearance) , or sometimes if the case involved a 16-year-old boy having consensual sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend.
Terrence Grange, ACPO lead for sexual offences and chief constable of Dyfed Powys Police, said: "Every incident will be treated on its own merit, taking into account the circumstances of the incident and the people involved."
A spokesman for the new Ministry of Justice (that name sends a shiver down my spine) said "very few" of the cautions were for rape offences against children -very few? VERY FEW? These people should hang their heads in shame that they knowingly even let one paedophile pervert who RAPED A CHILD get away with a caution! The scum should be hanged. Every decent human being should be outraged that these perverted, sick animals have been let free to roam the streets by our law enforcement agencys!
The spokeman then said: "The Government is committed to securing more convictions in rape cases and has commissioned the child sex offender review to ensure that children are better protected from paedophiles. There are very few circumstances indeed where a caution for rape or offences against children is the most appropriate sanction (so WHY do it then?).
"Use of cautions is a matter for the police but in exceptional circumstances - for instance where the victim does not want to proceed with a prosecution - a caution will still result in the offender having to comply with the notification provisions of the sex offenders register". And thats it - the twisted animals can carry on pretty much as usual while the victim has the rest of his or her life to live with the knowledge that the law did nothing to punish the perverts.

William Wordsworth (English Poet)
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."

How Can The Main Parties Get It So Wrong?

2007-06-09T14:09:00.001Z

Borders which do not keep economic migrants and terrorists out.
A European Union which is contemptuous of the democracies of its Member-States.
Schools which do not teach and qualifications which do not qualify.
Railways which were torn-up when it was foreseeable that our roads would become over-crowded.
TV channels which spread moral sewage and filth, as well as political propaganda, into the minds of our impressionable children.
A punishment system that does not punish real criminals and delinquents, and which prevents us from doing so.
A Human Rights Act which takes away our human rights.
And yet, if you notice any of these things, the main politicians add insult to injury by telling you that it is YOU, and not they, who are extreme!

WE STAND OR FALL AS A NATION and now the effects of what is happening in our country are now beginning to affect us significantly. For example:AFFORDABLE HOUSING SHORTAGES, JOB SHORTAGES, THE COMING WATER SHORTAGES AND EXCESSIVE BUILDING ON GREEN BELT LAND, TOO MANY TAXES AND TOO MANY JOBS FOR PEOPLE ‘WORKING’ IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT DOING FAKE JOBS. THE CREEPING ISLAMIFICATION OF OUR LAND (and YES it is OUR land!), THE INCREASE IN RACIST ATTACKS ON WHITE BRITISH PEOPLE. PATRONISING GOVERNMENT OFFICERS OFFERING HANDOUTS TO US WITH OUR OWN MONEY - DOUBTLESS TO KEEP US IN LINE! DON’T FALL FOR THAT ONE!
We in the British National Party, like you, are concerned about all of these things. And we will not be bullied into keeping silent by the somewhat witless name-calling that intimidates many folk, quite wrongly, into keeping quiet. We will speak out, and we do speak out when it is in the defence of our homeland and folk!

Join the BNP help us reclaim OUR country!

Store Wars - Join The Organic Rebellion

2007-06-08T17:18:00.000Z

This has absolutely nothing to do with history or politics, but it is a great piece of animation and well worth watching!

http://www.storewars.org/flash/index.html

This Day In The Falklands War

2007-06-08T13:41:00.000Z

8th June
Plymouth in Falkland Sound is hit by 4 Argentine bombs but none explode;

Sir Galahad and Sir Tristram are bombed at Fitzroy while the Welsh Guards are waiting to disembark - 51 die including 38 Welsh Guards and 55 are seriously wounded;

War cabinet asked not to reveal Fitzroy casualties;

Landing craft Foxtrot-4 sunk with British vehicles aboard;

3 Argentine skyhawks are shot down by sea harriers;

General Moore finalises battle plan for Stanley

Falklands Anniversary - June 14th 1982 - War Over

2007-06-08T13:20:00.000Z

A reminder of the sacrifices made by our forces to recapture the Falkland Islands from the Argies - a bit different to the last lot of our sailors who were recently "captured" by the Iranians without firing a shot! When the argies invaded the Falklands the small contingent of Royal Marines based there fought bravely against a massive invasion force and surrendered only when there was no further hope. I was a young man in the forces at the time and for me the war, short though it was, still resonates. I was not involved in the campaign but for me the following images and thoughts are still with me.

The bravery of the Royal Marines during the invasion

The Captain of the Atlantic Conveyor going down with his ship

The bombing of the Sir Galahad and Sheffield = the news reports were ghastly to watch

The cheers in our pubs whenever John Nott (then defence spokesman) announced any argy planes shot down

The silence in the same pubs when one of ours was shot down, and the same when we lost ships

The courage and fortitude of the marines and paras in extreme conditions

The VC awarded to Colonel H.Jones and the almost forgotten Sgt.McKay who was with him.

We are proud of you all.

Islam Exposed

2007-06-08T07:31:00.000Z

Almost every ‘mainstream’ politician has said that Islam is a religion of peace and that Islam means peace. But are they telling the truth about Islam? To ask that question is to be almost sure of the answer. In fact the word Islam does not mean peace, it means submission; and the faith of Islam is very far from being peaceful in the means that is uses to spread and maintain both the religion itself and what it feels is its right to dominance over others - their lands, their thoughts, their cultures, their legal systems; and their whole state and political and economic system. Indeed, in denying the truth about Islam, the ‘mainstream’ politicians are engaged in a whole-scale scheme of falsehood. This is not unique by any means: they have done the same sort of thing with regard to the real nature and intent of what was at first put across merely as a Common Market; and they have, for several decades, been selling the idea of the multi-racial and multi-cultural society as though it was voluntary, had no dangers for us, and had been done with our consent. So it should not surprise us if there is something fishy about this new line that they have taken - after the September 11th attacks in New York and the London bombings - that Islam means peace; and that peace is all that there is to Islam. If only that were the case; but it is not.

There are certainly a number of different views on Islam. One viewpoint, which is quite prevalent, is that Islam is a religion of peace because it is a religion. Religion is all about peace, is it not? Christianity is about peace and all religions are about the same God; and so Islam, for that reason as well, will be peaceful. The suicide bombers were merely misguided young men who hijacked an essentially good religion and used it to an evil purpose, much like many have done with Christianity (the Crusades would be mentioned at this point); and they had been forced to such extremism by the provocation meted out to the Palestinians by the wicked West, the Israelis, and the Zionists. Poor suicide bombers, one might think. This is not so much a viewpoint as a blind spot - blind to every thing in front of it; and is not worthy of any further treatment however much it resonates with highly-paid human rights lawyer, Cherrie Blair.

A second view of Islam does not attribute the peace of Christianity to the religion of Mohammed quite so directly; it recognises that Islam is more than a Nazarene sect with a towel on its head, and that it does have a holy book and recorded traditions of its own; drawn from its own distinctive cultural and revelational milieu. Nonetheless, it too tends to equate religion with what we have come to expect of religion as heavily influenced in the West by our ethos of Christianity. The god of Islam may well be different, this view says, and his ways in many respects at variance to those of Jehovah; but - out of respect for multi-culturalism, and welcoming ‘the other’, as well as respect for the truth (and there can be no conflict between the two) - we cannot, and must not judge, Islam by our own far from perfect Western standards. Islam will likewise be tolerant of us if we only play fair: everyone is basically decent, and if we do the plain decent thing to them, they will surely reciprocate, since all cultures have much to give; and they do not really look upon us as ‘infidels’ anymore, if they ever really did.

A third view of Islam says that Islam is a violent religion implacably hostile to all that is good and non-Muslim in the world, known as ‘the abode of war‘; and that the design and intent of Islam is to wreak havoc, ruin, mayhem, and death upon all the heathen, Jews, and Christians - unless they either convert (Allah is merciful), or submit to pay the dhimmi tax, and agree to survive as second class citizens in a Muslim dominated state, where they have little influence and cannot proselytise. There can be no doubt that - in the light of many Koranic surahs (verses) and in the face both of Islamic sharia (law) and the written hadiths or traditions of what Mohammed said and did - there is much to commend itself in this view of Islam. And yet we all feel - if we know any Muslims, that is - that this view is very harsh on some or many of the Muslims that we do know, or did know, not so very long ago. They were the last people, we feel, who could turn on us, or harbour murderers, fanatical terrorists, or rapists in our midst. It smacks too much of the view, held in world war two, that every German was a Nazi; that all Nazis were bad; and that the only good German was a dead German. However, much truth there may be in the third view, it is being taken too far if it means something like that. And the fact of the matter, I think, is that the warlike character of Islam - though a very important part of the picture - is, yet, only part of the whole picture. It is not the whole truth. If it was the whole of the obvious truth about Islam, many - indeed, I believe, most Muslims - might recoil from Islam in horror.

Whenever we study any evil and totalitarian regime, whether religious or secular, we must understand that the truth or reality about it is much less obvious to those caught up in it than we usually suppose. So we must be careful in judging others. Evil comes in many guises, or should we say disguises; if it did not, it would have far fewer followers. And whatever you make of the suicide bombers, or mass murderers - and however hard this may be for us to take - some of them, at least, thought (in some way) that they were doing good: the will of a good Allah, and not that of a monster. I am by no means making an apology for radical or mainstream Islam (the two really only differ in tactics and pace, not in the ends and the means, if needed); but we still, as difficult as it may appear, have to see things from their point of view (as well as our own) before we finally evaluate their religion. This is known as empathy, and is quite different to sympathy.

So what is the whole truth about Islam. Well it will help if we evaluate it in its parts and then stand back from the canvass, so to speak, and see the whole: how each different part relates to every other part; what is each part’s character; and, vitally, what is the tendency and intent which emerges from the whole when put together -when the whole is much more than the sum of its parts when disconnected. An illustration may serve to help. Let us imagine a disassembled bicycle in all sits separate parts. We see that each part has a design and function - some parts are clearly moving parts, and some parts are fixed parts; and some parts do not seem to make any sense at all. The bell, to make noises, does not seem to be part of a bike but part of some strange musical band. Then if, in our minds at least, we put all these parts together correctly, we see that each part has a relation to the whole even when - considered in isolation - they did not quite seem to fit what we had heard about conveyances. It is like that with every political or belief system that we come across. Each part has a unique function (not always obvious) in relation to the other parts and in regard to the overall purpose; not merely of any one part, but of the whole together.

To change the picture somewhat let us not imagine a human artefact, such as a bicycle, but a living organism such as a cell. Every political or religious belief-system (and every scientific theory for that matter), if it is to survive and propagate - that is to convert and sustain confidence - it must be able to explain things and to fight off gainsaying arguments and conflicting evidence. Somewhere in the belief system there will be a set of values, and a collection of arguments, that act as a defence mechanism saying that the belief-system is good and worthy and that its competitors, opponents, or detractors are either wrong or bad, in some vital way, or both. And that is the subtlety of every belief system. Not everyone who was involved in the Holy Inquisition did so from the lowest of motives; quite the reverse. The same was true of every other form of evil. The French Revolution’s reign of terror was propagated by many who thought of doing only good and were loyal to the ideals of ‘liberty, equality, and fraternity’; as the ‘brotherhood republics’ of Red China, North Korea, Viet Nam, and the Soviet Union were dedicated also to the ideal of ‘equality’. So the fact that Islam attracts good people with only good intentions, high morals, and respectable civic virtues should not surprise us. These other causes have done so too.

So, what do we make of Islam? Well it is essentially organised around a principle of violence, to put it crudely, or - to put it in a more nuanced and self-justifying way (remember the analogy of the cell fighting of its detractors) - it is Allah’s mandated way of converting the world to his truth preferably by persuasion, if possible, but by military jihad and compulsion, if need be.

Yes, Islam is a religion; but that means, in its own terms so different to the West, that it is an army too. It is also a one-party state and political system. Like any army every member is a warrior but not all warriors are combatants in the front line. All are literally in uniform so to speak (as you would expect of an army) but many only contribute indirectly to the overall job of ‘spreading the faith’ - just as with the bicycle only some of the parts contribute directly to its movement by moving themselves. Yes, the faith must be spread in the end by the sword if necessary; but only if necessary. In that sense Islam could well be seen as a religion of peace. And if the approach of peaceful persuasion does not succeed there are many other ways, short of actual violence, but involving force which can ‘persuade’. For example the show of force to induce the non-Muslim world to convert willingly or to be cowed into submission, may suffice. War and violence, terrorism and intimidation are only some of the means of carrying on the mission. In ‘peaceful’ Islamic theory, war should be the servant of the mission, not its master. So, yes, militant mainstream Islam does have a peaceful side to it. But then so too does a battleship. The USS Missouri did not have to always fire its guns in anger to have the needed effect. It could attain its objective, at times, merely by the threat of force or by its very appearance and presence. The use of force may not always be needed, or desirable. Voluntary conversions to Islam do take place when it is portrayed in the rose coloured spectacles of the Western ‘liberals’. So, why war when you can succeed without it? But, alas, those who perhaps willingly and winsomely come into Islam rarely, if ever, are so free or willing to renounce it. It is not the way into a religion which is important - to see whether the religion is free or not - but the way out of it, which is often the more telling.

Certainly many Muslims are wholly peaceful and would never do the kind of things that their religious compatriots would do; but does that matter? Not every part on the assembled bicycle was a moving part but the bicycle is nonetheless designed to move; and not every sailor on the USS Missouri was a gunner or an aimer, or a target-locater and identifier; but yet - whether cook or laundryman - all too obviously peaceful roles - each contributed an essential part to the fighting nature of the whole. We must not infer the role of the whole from the limited use and peaceful function of a part. What matters in that sense is not the individual but the whole. For it is as a whole that it operates.

It is mainstream Islamic policy in Europe, under the orders of the Muslim Council of Europe, that no Muslim can lead a good Muslim life outside of his community; that all Muslims can only express a good and religious life in community with other Muslims around a Mosque; and that Muslims must congregate as Muslims in specified areas (encampments?) from which they can dominate a locality and from which they can then spread out. The army has a strategy; and it looks like an army - a religious army but an army nonetheless. One can hardly blame it, in one sense, for following through, and working out in practice, the teachings of its own holy book together with the written down traditions of their prophet. Islam is behaving in character and according to its nature and its purposes as, it believes it is, God’s true and noble religion. The truth must dominate and prevail; and it must do so in this life. What is surprising about the whole situation is not the ‘suicide’ bombings, the honour killings, the violence and intimidation of the few over the many, the paedophile-weddings, the rapes and enslavings of those taken in war - for all these are part of its nature, its teachings, its principles and its history; what is surprising is that the self-styled ‘liberal’ and ‘do-gooder’ elite have imagined that it could have been otherwise. Perhaps, just perhaps, it could have been; but the fact is that it is not, nor is it likely to be, with the policies being vigorously perused by the current ‘powers that be’ over Islam and over the West. There are none so blind as those who will not see.

Thanks to my my good friend the Reverend Robert West (Christian Council of Britain) for his permission to reproduce this article. As with all posts feel free to link with acknowledgement.
The Lincolnshire Patriot

Another Sickening Attack

2007-06-07T16:49:00.000Z

Mary Sear was determined to lead an active, independent life.
The widowed great-grandmother lived alone and went out in all weathers to do her shopping.
On the morning of her 96th birthday, she walked the half mile to her daughter's house to receive her cards and gifts from the family.
And on the way home, she was knocked to the ground as a mugger took her handbag.
He rifled through her birthday cards, shaking out the birthday money they contained.
Mrs Sear, from Harrow, North-West London, died of a heart attack six days later in hospital, where she was being treated for a broken hip and shoulder.
IF the case is officially classified as homicide, she could make history as Britain's oldest murder victim. Some consolation to her family eh?
Until now, Harrow, whose MP is Tony McNulty, had been considered one of London's safest boroughs (but that in itself is nothing to be proud of as all through the country violent crime is escalating and nowhere is as safe as it was just a few years ago)
The incident is further evidence of the burgeoning street crime which leaves the elderly in fear.
Conservative councillor Susan Hall described the attack as horrific.
"It is absolutely shocking, something we would never expect to happen here," she said.
"My personal view is that if you shock someone into death, that is the same as putting a gun to their head.
"This was an innocent old lady going about her business."
The mugging happened on Tuesday last week.
The day after, a man of 27 faced court accused of two robberies, including that of Mrs Sear.
Further charges could be considered following her death. A Scotland Yard source said that to mount a successful prosecution for murder, officers will have to establish a direct link between the robbery and Mrs Sear's death.
"It's difficult, but not impossible," said one. "Murder squad officers are on standby to deal with the case."
In a statement, Mrs Sear's heartbroken family said: "She was a wonderful mother, grandmother and great grandmother who will be sorely missed."
The mugging left her in a terrible state. Until then she had been a perfectly independent lady.
"Although she was 96 she got about and visited her family. I saw her in hospital after the attack and she had a broken hip and was really bashed up."

It is way past the time when we should be dealing properly with lowlife scum like this 27 year old piece-of-shit. If a victim dies after a robbery then the criminal scum should be jailed for life. We have to much fannying around with this sort of thing, trying to make sure 110% that the poor criminal was directly responsible for the death. He robbed her, she died - end of story - jail him for life. Our liberal politicians will never bring back the death penalty, being more concerned with the rights and wants of the criminals, and to hell with the victims and their families! Its time this country got its guts back and started hanging drug-traffickers, terrorists, child killers and paedophiles as well as animals like the vermin who robbed and killed this 96 year old lady. Life should mean a minimum of 25 years not the paltry few years in a comfortable cell most end up serving. You should realise there is NO war on terror, NO war on crime - just soft soap as usual.

Sir Winston Churchill
"Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar."

Lincolnshire BNP

2007-06-07T16:08:00.000Z

http://www.lincolnshirebnp.com/news.php

worth a regular drop-in

Pegasus Bridge - June 6th 1944

2007-06-07T15:00:00.000Z

The British 6th Airborne was given the task of securing the most easterly areas of the British landing beaches. This included the estuary of the River Orne and the Canal de Caen. This involved the capture and destruction of the German coastal battery at Merville, and the seizure, intact, of the two bridges at Benouville. One bridge spanned the river Orne and the other the Caen canal. It was vital these two bridges were captured intact to ensure the road inland was open for the advancing Allied Forces due to hit hit the beaches that morning.
The Divisional Commander, Major General Richard Gale decided to send in a special force of six gliders, carrying a force of 180 men. Three gliders would land and take the river bridge. The other three would land and take the canal bridge.For this mission the men of D Company, 2nd Battalion, Oxfordshire and Buckinghampshire Light Infantry (Ox and Bucks) were selected along with Royal Engineers from 'B' company and pilots of the Glider Pilots Regiment.
Major John Howard and his men evacuated the glider as quickly as possible, and attacked the bridge. The German defenders were taken by surprise. Lieutenant Brotheridge who led the attack across the bridge was shot in the neck and became the first Allied soldier killed on D Day. The men from the other two gliders joined the battle and within 5 minutes the bridge was secured. Five men were wounded in the battle for the canal bridge.
Of the gliders which were designated for the Orne river bridge, two landed within 300 and 700 meters from the target and one missed completely. When the bridge was attacked it was found to be undefended, the German troops had fled.
The two bridges had to be secured and held until the rest of the 6th Airborne, which had parachuted in, could relieve the Ox and Bucks, which was no easy task as the Germans launched two ferocious counterattacks including armour (tanks) - this was soon put out of action by Sgt. Thornton using a PIAT (projectile-infantry-anti-tank) gun, from very close range. The paratroops finally arrived at 3.00a.m. to the relief of Major Howard and his men. A brilliant feat had been accomplished, the two bridges had been secured, the road-link was open, ready for the invading allied troops due to arrive from the beacheads.
When you think that the gliders were released from their tug aircraft at 5,000 ft. in darkness, using only maps and stop watches, it is understandable that it was described as the "Finest piece of airmanship of the war"

D-Day 6th June 1944 - Lest We Forget

2007-06-07T14:25:00.000Z

Why do you still march old man,
With medals on your chest?
Why do you still grieve old man,
For those friends you laid to rest?
Why do your eyes gleam old man,
When you hear the bugles blow?
Tell me why you cry old man,
About those days so long ago?

I'll tell you why i march young man,
With medals on my chest,
I'll tell you why i grieve young man,
For those i laid to rest,
Through misty fields of gossamer silk,
Come visions of distant times,
When boys of tender age lost lives,
And all their mothers pined.
We buried them in a blanket shroud,
Their young flesh scorched and blackened,
In a communal grave, newly gouged,
In bloodstained gorse and bracken.

And you ask me why i march young man,
I march to remind you all,
That but for those apple blossom youths,
You'd never have known freedom at all.

Rupert Brooke (1887-1915) - English poet

"If I should die, think only this of me: That there's some corner of a foreign field that is for ever England. There shall be in that rich earth a richer dust concealed; A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, A body of England's, breathing English air, Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.
And think, this heart, all evil shed away, A pulse in the eternal mind, no less Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given; Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day; And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness, In hearts at peace, under an English heaven".
("The Soldier" - 1914)

Hydrophobia

2007-05-31T06:13:00.000Z

Well, i am not quite foaming at the mouth but its surprising that i am not with the poisonous pro homo propaganda being taught to our youngsters. Schools here in Lincolnshire have rolled out a number of books extolling the "alternative" lifestyle "option" of homosexulaity. This filth is being peddled to children as young as four. Here in the sick and twisted minds of our so-called liberal government the normalisation of the abnormal and the abnormalisation of the normal is the order of the day. Speak out and you are immediately villified as "homophobic" (whatever the hell that means) and this is designed to make you feel the odd one out. The Bible describes homosexuality as an abomination (brings a whole new meaning to Sodom and Gommorah). Even the Muslims are anti (must have slipped past mohammed, that one). The fact is it does exist BUT that does not mean it should be promoted as normal. The main driver of life on earth is procreation - the survival of the species. This means having children, and however you dress up homosexuality, they cannot have offspring. Less than fifty years ago homosexuality was illegal in this country. This was beacause in those not so far off days the law of the land recognised homosexuality as wrong, in both the biblical and natural sense. Our government, a government with absolutely no moral compass, is failing our society by allowing an anything goes culture, with minority groups screaming for their "rights", and with never a thought for anything or anyone outside of their own small sphere of self gratification. The teaching of homosexuality in our schools, and anywhere else for that matter, is a direct contradiction of this countrys christian values and as such should be immediately removed from all curriculums and from all public exposure.

Holbeach Town Ward Results

2007-05-04T17:36:00.000Z

It is under a year since Cllr Revd Robert West fled from the CONservatives as one of their District Councillors and found political asylum from Cameron's mind-bending 'political correctness' with the British National Party.

Now on 3rd May 2007 the Holbeach Town Ward Unit of the BNP contested the same three-Member ward and achieved 2000 votes for its three candidates whilst the Tories - with 3,000 votes - took all the three vacancies for the town. The Independents trailed with about 1,000 votes. Cheers of triumph resounded from the Tory side when it became clear that Revd West had failed to regain his seat, this time as a BNP candidate. However, elation soon turned to grimace as, on local TV and to the local press, the Revd graciously castigated the Conservative Party as leading this country to ruin; and pointed out - in his full clerical garb - how only the BNP could turn Britain round to achieve what is right and capture the values that made us what we are, what we once were; and what we should be in the futurre. There was no air of defeat about the Holbeach BNP Unit - far from it with such a result from nowhere and in such a short period of political time.

In the bigger scheme of things the result in Holbeach is a major success: it shows what can be done with dedication even in one of Toryland's safest seats and wards. Watch-out traitor-tory con-man: the BNP are here, and we are here to stay. But neither will we be resting on our laurels. Many lessons have been learnt and will continue to be learned in the next few months and years as we work for total victory in our country over the forces of wickedness which seek to engulf us.

The detailed breakdown was as follows:

Francis Biggadyke (Conservative) 1116
Rudkin (Conservative) 893
Michael Taylor (Conservative) 868
Tony Turner (BNP) 665
Rev Robert West (BNP) 650
Peter Chapman (BNP) 605
Michael Howard (Independent) 558
Warrender (Independent) 475

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"We shall go on till the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island what ever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches and we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We will never surrender".
(Extract from speech delivered on 13th May 1940)

D Day Minus 1 - 22 Hours and 56 minutes to go

2007-05-02T08:04:00.000Z

We are almost at D Day for the elections. The ward has been swept three times, our people are tired but in good spirits. Tommorow will be a long and hard day for all patriots fighting to establish a beachead in council chambers throughout this land - our Britain! I wish to thank all decent men and women for the time and effort you have put in - from the street activists to the internet bloggers who have all contributed to the ongoing camapign to rescue our beloved islands from the wreckers we currently have in power. The polling stations open in less than 24 hours and we have our volunteers ready for the big push. Win or lose we have done all we can. Depending on the timing of the count i will post the results for our ward on Friday morning.
Gentlemen - Good Luck to you all!

I make no aplogies for re-using an old quote below.

I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips, Straining upon the start. The game's afoot, Follow your spirit; and upon this charge Cry "God for Harry! England and Saint George".

(Henry V - Henry urges his men into the attack at the Siege of Harfleur)

Operation Freedom - Report From The Battlefront

2007-04-28T08:32:00.000Z

As the freedom fighters of the British National Party continue building on their support base in preparation for Thursdays offensive against the unholy forces of the traitorous Lib/Lab/Con alliance, reports from the front bode well. In my area the canvassing is going well with the "ayes" equalling the "nays" for voting day. However the number of "possibles" is large, and considering our voter base is always likely to be understated, we are quietly confident that we may yet pull off the unexpected and take a seat within the ward. Our canvassing teams have put in a phenomenal amount of man hours, including one activist who is currently putting in 10 hour days five days a week, and who took a month off work to be able to do so! Needless to say, i will be buying him good English ale for quite some time if we win! Our local press have given us equal coverage, as they have other party candidates, with no anti-BNP slant whatsovever. I have had people come up to me in my local pub to tell me they will be voting BNP and "the BNP are what we need around here - you will have my vote". I have only had 2 "screamers" (brainwashed anti-bnp lunatics who feel the need to shout) who i told i would put down as "possibles", which wound them up even more! Considering the ward has 4500 voters, only two lunatics is a welcome respite from my day job................
Anyway i am about to hit the streets again and my next post will be after the election - whatever you do, DONT FORGET TO VOTE - VOTE BNP!

Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) - american philosopher & poet
"I feel in regard to this aged England, that she see a little better on a cloudy day and that, in a storm of battle and calamity, she has a secret vigour and a pulse like a cannon".

Look For Us Coming On The Dawn Of The Fourth Day

2007-04-06T07:51:00.000Z

All over this sceptered isle of ours the beleagured citizens of the land are being overun by the forces of darkness. Our traitorous politicians and their servants are continually pushing our people further down the path of political correctness, the islamification of our our once great land, and we are made to feel normal is abnormal and vice versa - and may God help you if you defy them! A band of brave men and women stand together, and even now are rallying to lead the fightback against this horde of self serving multiculturalists. The British Resistance - the BNP - are fielding a record number of candidates in the May 3rd elections ( of which i am proud to be among their number) in an attempt to turn back the yoke descending on the free indigenous people of these islands. The election is set for the Third of May in the year of our Lord 2007, and although some of us will fall to wayside, a number of us will be elected. The election results will be published on the 4th May - so, Look For Us Coming On The Dawn Of The Fourth Day - the tide will turn. You need to have faith in your fellow countrymen and you need to VOTE. VOTE BNP!

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"I see the damage done by the enemy....but I also see the spirit of an unconquerable people."

Fair Minded Report

2007-03-28T17:09:00.000Z

The Spalding Guardian paper recently interviewd Nick Griffin when he came to speak at a local venue. the coverage was even-handed and fair. The paper has printed many letters from supporters over the years and is one of the better local papers. the report can be viewed here by clicking the link!

http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=829&ArticleID=2122051

A Busy Time

2007-03-28T16:45:00.000Z

Well the last couple of weeks have been hectic, thats for sure! With the May 3rd elections only a few weeks away it has been all hands to the pumps. Due to the extra workload i have not been able to post as regularly as i would like too, and this does not look like changing much until May!
However i will endeavour to catch up with some posts over the next few days.

The Daily Mirror, toilet rag that it is, owned by the Trinity Mirror Group has had its own bus out and about celebrating the benefits of our multi-culti land (as seen through the rose tinted spectacles that are supplied when they climb into their ivory towers), and completely ignoring the reality of the situation on the streets here in Britain. I can and do cook a good curry but it dosent mean i want thirteen take-aways on my high street, yet the Mirror tells its picture readers that this is whats great about diversity! Visit my town and the benefits are here for all to enjoy.
Enjoy NOT being able to get an NHS dentist
Enjoy the louts outside the local takeaways scumming up the pavements til all hours
Enjoy being on the bottom of the housing list for 8 years as the "priority" cases are dealt with first (thats anyone not born here,on the scrounge and never paid a penny into the system they are encouraged to pillage at the expense of the indigenous population)
Enjoy drunken foreign criminals driving like madmen around the town
Enjoy your council tax increases to finance "diversity" initiatives - at your cost!
Enjoy the South African shop
Enjoy the Polish shop
Enjoy the closure of your home-grown local shops and the increase of take-aways and betting shops on the high street.

If, like me, you are actually NOT enjoying this celebration of every-other-culture-except-your-own, then on May 3rd VOTE BNP!

Cry "God for Harry! England and Saint George!".

2007-03-10T18:31:00.000Z

The hair-raising battle cry of Henry V extolling his countrymen into the breech at the siege of Harfleur against the French in William Shakespeares Henry V. My fellow nationalist blogger The Green Arrow (link on left) has today called for a new crusade against the forces of darkness that are arrayed against the freeborn British people of this land. The Free English people are stirring again, waking from the sleep that the country has been in for the last decade of marxist rule. Our lands have been traded piece by piece by our traitorous politicians to the power-mongers of the EU, the ever more fervent demands of the Muslims jihadists,and they have encouraged morally bankrupt narcissitic lifestyles and the have now - pay later consumer culture that we are led to believe will bring us contentment, if not happiness. All of these issues are a threat to our well-being as a nation of free people. The modern crusaders, the defenders of our homeland, are the BNP. The British National Party, outnumbered, outgunned, and with a hostile media attacking us almost daily, stand firm in our defence of the Free British People. The future of Britain is the BNP and is in your hands! Join, support and vote for the BNP at the May 3rd elections. No candidate to vote for? Fight for your freedom, have some guts, and stand yourself!
This is no time for armchair warriors, but a time to make a stand - stand up for yourself, your children and your childrens children! They will thank you for it in the long run. If you are not prepared to join the New Crusade then yes, youll live, but you will live under the yoke of ever more oppressive legislation, muslim law as they push and push towards an islamic state,and the status of a second class citizen in your own homeland. Fight, and we MAY lose - but we will go down fighting, not grovelling, not scared to speak out and in the knowledge of knowing who we are! BUT we can win, and winning changes all the rules! Our country back to safe and secure borders, a country with a first class health and education system for all OUR people. So i urge each and every one of you to rally to the new crusade and help the BNP in our defence of this sceptred isle! Once more into the breech! Once more into the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. Cry "God for Harry!, England and St.George!"

William Shakespeare
"And gentlemen in England now abed shall think themselves accursed they were not here, And hold their manhoods cheap while any speaks that fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day"

Backlog of Illegals Cleared

2007-03-09T13:09:00.000Z

Well i dont know about the rest of you but yesterday i had my ear glued to the radio throughout the day. I eagerly anticipated announcers reporting our ferryports and airports at a complete standstill as hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants with mobile phones exited our land poste haste, under what must rank as one of the hardest hitting government initiatives we have yet seen! How many actually left? That would be none then, Mr Reid? Nil, nada, zilch. I want to know what these boys in the homeoffice are on - maybe some of Cameroons stash? After getting over my shock at finding my country still full of illegals, i thought of a few questions:
1) Were they text in English? If so - we may as well give up now, as even half the bloody "legals" cant speak English after years here.
2)If they were text in a multitude of foreign tongues - how many languages and translators were involved?
3)Were they given phone credit to "pass it on"?
4)Were any that did turn up for deportation sent back into the UK as they didnt have a passport?
5) If we have their phone numbers then they can be traced easily and removed from the country - why havent we done so?

The mind boggles! I also understand that they will no longer be allowed to claim benefits. Excuse me, but for a moment there i thought Reid said "no longer claim benefits" - does the word "illegal" as applied to criminal immigrants mean nothing to our "not fit for purpose" home secretary? How in gods name are we giving money and services to people who are not even here legally! As usual the liberal left bedwetters are wringing their hands and snivelling into their fairtrade hankies that this will cause hardship amongst the illegals, making them destitute and more likely to turn to crime (like that isnt an issue currently?). Its a tough old world out there and in Britain we are full up and fed up! Reid needs to get a grip on reality and then get a grip on these illegals and remove them pronto. That will save the taxpayer (yes - you and i again) countless millions of pounds, would mean some additional work would become available for the indigenous British population AT A DECENT RATE of pay (this "argument", if it can be called one, that the migrants and illegals "do the jobs the british wont" is garbage and morally flawed - it is corporate greed - that is all!).
I am sure the government will roll out further "initiatives" over the coming weeks as we head towards various elections. This type of action does nothing but give ammunition to the chattering classes, making no impact at all in the real world we inhabit.

Post Script: apparently ONE illegal was sighted on a li-lo heading towards France. However when apprehended he claimed (through a taxpayer paid for translator) he had merely got the tide times wrong and would be back again tommorow

Rupert Brooke (1887-1915) - English Poet:

If i should die, think only this of me: That there's some corner of a foreign field that is for ever England. There shall be in that rich earth a richer dust concealed, a dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, gave once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, a body of England's, breathing English air, washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.
And think, this heart, all evil shed away, a pulse in the eternal mind, no less gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given, her sights and sounds, dreams happy as her day, and laughter, learnt of friends,and gentleness, in hearts at peace, under an English heaven".
("The Soldier" - 1914)

Muslims Pushed Back Again............

2007-03-03T18:24:00.000Z

In an earlier post i wrote about a case in Buckinghamshire where a muslim pupil was taking legal action (or rather the people behind her were - she is only 12) to allow the wearing of the niqab - the full-face or "letterbox" veil. It appeared that as is the norm it was going to cost us (the taxpayer) a shedload of our hard earned money whichever way the case went. However, in what appears as a glint of common sense from the courts, her case has been lost and she cannot wear the veil in school! For legal reasons, both the girl and the school cannot be identified and it is believed the girl has been taught at home (at a cost to the taxpayer no doubt!) after falling foul of the ban last year. About 120 of the school's 1300 pupils are Muslims. About half of them wear the hijab headscarf, which is allowed. In his judgement, Mr Justice Silber said the ban was "proportionate". Firstly because the veil prevented teachers from seeing the faces and expressions of the pupils. Secondly, the necessity of enforcing a reasonable school uniform policy to ensure equality (hmm - theres THAT word again) amongst the pupils; thirdly to prevent peer pressure on girls to take up wearing the full veil/letterbox and, finally, to avoid unwanted visitors using the veil as a disguise in order to breach the school's security.The school's head teacher welcomed the court's decision and costs in the case were awarded against the girl's family. Well thats good news - the banning of this bat headgear is to be welcomed always as it is not a religious requirement for muslims, only an outwardly visible sign of separation and non-integration into the host community here in the UK. And they have had the costs awarded against them! This is great news for the taxpayer and maybe, just maybe, might make these people think again before pushing at the boundaries of hospitality and law in this isle of ours. When will these people realise that our country and constitution (the Bill of Rights, such as it is) is not a "living" document that is open to change by whatever bunch of chancers fancy their arm to do so. If you want to live here then abide by OUR laws, OUR culture, OUR rules - if you dont like it then leave and go and live in an islamic state elsewhere! OUR COUNTRY IS NOT FOR YOU TO DO AS YOU WANT!

William Shakespeare (1564-1616)
"This blessed plot, this earth, this realm. This England, this nurse, this teaming womb of royal kings".
(John of Gaunts speech in Richard II)

Poles Apart

2007-03-03T08:12:00.000Z

The Polish health service are refusing to treat Britons who fall ill while in their country! Instead the unfortunate potential patients are being sent back to the UK for treatment. The poles first claimed it was on the grounds of spreading infection. So, let me get this right, you have an infectious illness but instead of a course of treatment "on site" so to speak, you have to travel home and during the trip you will not infect anyone else? I did check that this was Poland and NOT Ireland - and indeed it is. After being soundly bashed by blisteringly belligerent Britons complaining to their embassies the Poles then came up with another "reason" for the non treatment of foreign nationals. Namely that their health service was overloaded and could not cope! Im sorry but for a moment there i thought they said they could not cope? After nearly choking on my Cocoa (good job i wasnt in poland, eh?) i thought about the implications. Now we have god only knows how many Poles here in the UK (three-quarters of a million seems to be the standard uneducated guess) ALL with access to our third world health service for free. Our local hospital, the Pilgrim (oh the irony) at Boston is full of poles and other foreign nationals. It is particularly full in A & E at the weekends when they seek treatment after sharing their "culture" with each other - a culture seeming to consist of getting as pissed as possible on cheap vodka and bashing each other about, or crashing their uninsured cars while semi-comatose (im not joking here - i have seen it with my own eyes, the worst being three separate car crashes on my local high street on a friday night with the drivers too drunk even to get out of the cars). We should take a leaf out of the poles book and refuse to treat these drunken, self injuring sons-of-bitches and send THEM back to poland for treatment. Every nurse, doctor or staff member at our hospitals could then get on treating the British people who have contributed something to the service instead of patching up unwanted cheap foreign labour who ignore many of our laws and cause untold damage to our health service by clogging the system through their own stupidity.
Britain is being severely damaged by cheap foreign labour - we are paying £77 million in benefits to them each year as well a providing translators, school places etc - and that is without the impact of job losses among the local British workforce. The BNP will exit the EU as fast a you can say " a chep buttle ov wodka ant an ambu-lence pleez" and stop the farcial shennanigans of many of these so called "guest workers" - who are certainly not guests nor, judging by the amount of benefits they are scrounging, workers either! VOTE BNP! OUT OF EUROPE!

William Wordsworth - Poet
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."

Terror Alert Level Upgrade

2007-02-23T17:18:00.000Z

Security services (MI5) have today announced an immediate security upgrade in mainland UK effective as of 13.00 hours. The Labour Government have reacted to the security alert by raising their Public Security Level from "Scoundrels" to "You Dirty Rotters". Amidst a flurry of extremist activity it is expected that levels will be raised again to "Bloody Disgusting" or even "Absolutely Furious". (As a side note, Londoners have not been "Absolutely Furious" since the Blitz in 1940, when tea supplies almost ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorised from "Simply Not Cricket" to "Damned Unsporting". The last time an alert of this magnitude was issued was during the Norman invasion in 1066AD).

As a direct result of our own increased security level, the following countries have increased theirs accordingly:

The French Government has announced that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Run and Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was initially precipitated by a recent terrorist attack that destroyed the French white flag factory, effectively paralysing the countries military capabilities.

Italy has increased its alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing". Two further levels remain to the Italian government. They are: Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides", a level which was last issued in World War Two.

Ireland initially raised its threat level to "Offer Them Refuelling Facilities for U-Boats" , a level withdrawn when a passing schoolboy pointed out that the terrorists did not have any yet. The level remains at "Have The Crack".

Germanys security level has increased from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Sing Marching Songs" with again a further two options of "Invade Your Neighbours" and "Lose".

The USA, not wanting to be sidelined, has gone from "Wait and See Whos Winning" to "What is Friendly Fire?"

Finally, all of Belguim has gone on holiday as the only threat they face is NATO pulling out of Brussels.

Agincourt - A Very English Victory

2007-02-23T14:46:00.000Z

Date: 25th October 1415
Agincourt in northern France

Henry V was an outstanding soldier, strategically and tactically aware he was ruthless to religious and political opponents.Born in 1387 he spent most of his life in warfare and died while campaigning in 1422.

After taking the town of Harfleur Henry moved across France. On the 24th October he found his way blocked by a French force of 25,000 heavily armed troops.
They prepared for the battle which would surely see the English wiped out the next day.
By this time Henry had only 6,000 men, comprising of 5,000 archers and 1,000 men-at-arms. However the archers were armed with a weapon that was to command battlefields for years to come, the English Longbow.
Probably Welsh in origin, and adapted, the longbow required immense strength to fire, but it had a huge range and an experienced man could fire twelve arrows in a minute, the crossbow could manage only two. The English had perfected the art by making it law for the populace to practice on Sundays. Even today many villages and towns still have a village green which was originally used for this purpose.The huge French army, which was led by Charles D'Albret, sat and waited for the English to make a move so that it could go in for the kill.
Henry decided to advance to within 200 yards of the French with the cry 'Advance banners!'From there they sent a volley of arrows which struck ferociously into the first French ranks.There had been heavy rain and the ground, which was ploughed, was soft and muddy. In addition the field was narrow and thick woods protected Henrys flanks. This forced the massive French force to bunch together as they advanced, effectively channelling them towards the English frontline. As they came forward the English archers fired their first volleys. Within five minutes the entire first wave of French were reduced to a helpless bloody mess struggling in their heavy armour. Their arrows soon gone, the lightly armoured English archers darted about the struggling French masses, retrieving arrows and dispatching struggling men-at-arms with daggers. Still the French came on, pushed forward by pride and arrogance. Time and time again the waves of attack were stopped, the English archers now protected by a wall of French dead. Finally the French reserves led by the Duke of Brabant made a final attempt to break the English line, but he had effectively joined a lost battle and was just in time to be killed. The French retreated.

The French losses were put at 10,000 including its commander Charles D'Albret. Only a handful of English were lost (some sources estimate as low as 23 men). Henry and his men had shown tremendous courage in the face of overwhelming odds and had been assisted by favourable ground conditions. It was a great English victory and one well worth remembering!

Lord Admiral Horatio Nelson
"First, you must implicitly obey orders… Secondly, you must consider every man as your enemy who speaks ill of your King... And thirdly, you must hate a Frenchman as you do the devil".
(Giving advice to a new recruit on how to survive in the Royal Navy)

What About Our Own People?

2007-02-23T09:31:00.000Z

This is the stuff of nightmares. I know Spalding very well and am aware of the housing problems faced by many local people:

Lincolnshire Housing plan for Migrant Workers

It is reported in the local paper, the Spalding Guardian (www.spaldingtoday.co.uk) of 15th February, that local migrant labour peddler "Ray Turner Labour Ltd" has submitted plans to house up to 300 migrant workers on a new development near Spalding in Lincolnshire. Currently Spalding is overwhelmed with migrant labour due to the pressures on the food industry from the major supermarkets. This is being fed by the greed of local businesses wishing to cash in on the exploitation of foreign migrant labour. Spalding is becoming so "enriched" that it is difficult to hear English being spoken in the town, and when out shopping. A council employee recently commented how nice it was to deal with an English person for a change!
The papers own poll currently shows 77% of people against the development, but unsurprisingly, residents fear that the council and local opinion will be overridden by the ODPM (office of the deputy prime minister) and permission will be granted. This will bring the strain on local health and education services to a crisis point, as often the migrant workers in this area do not send their money home, but bring their relatives to the town, as in the case of Milda Staffieri, who brags that the development "would be a big boost for migrant workers". With hot-bedding already a big problem in the area, this could be a major source of tension as Spalding already has one of the highest unemployment rates in the area, mainly due to unethically imported (and unwanted) foreign labour.

I was in my local pub last night and a local couple were telling me that they had been on the housing list for seven years and now, due to an influx of foreign workers and their dependants, have been told that have been downgraded yet again! They had no idea of when or even if they could expect to be suitably housed. This situation is fast becoming intolerable for many local people. The locals will oppose any planning permissions sought by greedy local businesses to house their exploited workers. However, this alone will not help those Britons who do not have access to low-cost housingt. We need a change of policy and this starts at grassroots level by changing from the old parties to one that will put the indigenous people first! That party is the BNP!

Black on Black Killings - Peckham

2007-02-16T14:43:00.000Z

I watched the news the other night, flicking between the BBC and ITV propaganda. The reporters were all in a frenzy trying to out dramatise each other while reporting on the latest shootings in "sarf landan" - this time in Peckham. What caught my attention? The BBC reporter said that the permanent police operation Trident were meeting in the morning to investigate this latest episode and explained that Trident was set up to combat crime "affecting the black community". Nothing sinister in that description, i hear you mutter. However the ITV reporter a few minutes later said that Trident was a ongoing police operation investigating Black on Black gun crime! Now theres a world of difference between the two descriptions used and the BBC report makes no mention of race - no surprise there! So i dug around a little and found that Trident is indeed an ongoing police operation with over 300 police officers and 70 support staff that are dedicated to Trident, supported and informed by Trident's "Independent Advisory Group" whoever they are. Thats about 1.5% of the London Police Force (sorry, "service") on full time duties trying to stop black on black gun crime in the capital. Assuming the average mean pay of the officers is circa £30k that is a cost of £12,000,000 per annum for what is a minority of criminals within the black community! Del Boy would be turning in his car coat.......

Stephen Leacock (1869-1944)
"American politicians do anything for money... English politicians take the money and won't do anything ".

Horse, Stable, Bolted....................

2007-02-16T11:26:00.000Z

According to the papers plans for a new 700-bed jail beside South-east London's maximum security Belmarsh prison have been announced by unfit-for-purpose Home Secretary John Reid.
He also revealed that planning permission had been secured for a new 600-place prison near Ashworth high security mental hospital in Merseyside.
The two projects together are likely to cost more than £160m to build, although the Home Office refused to disclose official costings ahead of a bidding process for construction contracts (which probably means that as usual they havent got a clue).
A site has been purchased by the Home Office next to Belmarsh - one of the most secure prisons in the country which features a special "jail within a jail" housing many Muslim terrorists. The planned new prison is expected to be a lower risk Category C jail.
The Home Secretary said: "We are working flat out (Government speak for doing bugger-all) to deliver additional capacity within the prison system. In July last year I announced plans for an extra 8,000 places to be delivered by 2012. That process starts now. We already own two potential sites for new prisons and I can announce today that one of them is at Maghull, where we already have planning permission to provide up to 600 new places by 2010. A second is next door to Belmarsh prison in south-east London, where we are still in discussion with the planning authorities.
In total, our building programme now amounts to about 8,000 new places over the next five years. In 2007 alone, I am planning to deliver about 2,500 new places, including about 1,500 by July, with new places at 13 different prisons."
Apparently Reid will say during a visit to Maghull that another 30 sites are being considered for new jails across the country.

Now i might be missing the maths here but as i understand that we are currently short of around 11,000 prison places as of February 2007. Therefore even if no additional felons in the country are sent to prison between now and 2012, apart from on a one-out one-in basis we will still be short some 3000 prison places! Funnily enough the figure of 11,000 is precisely the same amount as the number of foreign criminals in our jails.........so to me the solution is to deport ALL 11,000 of the foreign criminal scum currently languishing in Her Majestys prisons and fill the places up with our own home-grown scum. As usual Nu-Labour have no real solution and are, as always, too little too late in their approach to any contact with the real world. The words horse, stable and bolted spring to mind.

Samuel Johnson
"He that wishes to see his country robbed of its rights can not be a patriot".

Lying by Omission - Illegal Traveller Sites

2007-02-09T13:49:00.000Z

I have been reading recently in the press about the illegal traveller sites in England. There has been a lot of huffing and puffing from all sides of the community and particularly from our councillors and government. The reality is this. There is NO LAW for local authorities to provide alternative sites for these people. It is only a GUIDELINE from the Secretary of State. I repeat, there is no basis in law to assist these people. They are living illegally and our councils should move them on immediately. The arguments about whether the sites are clean, whether they pay council tax or their children are at local schools are not the point. These people are trying to buck the system, purchasing land, moving onto it and then applying for retrospective planning permission. If you or i were to this do this we would be dealt with in short order. I am disgusted that our local councils have not seen fit to tell the taxpaying public that there is no legal obligation to further assist these travellers. Instead, by omission, we have been led to believe there is a legal basis for spending even more of our hard earned money on finding and purchasing these alternative sites. I hope when election time comes people will remember the way in which this "alternative sites" policy has been misleadingly presented to the public. If any councillor reading this can give a good valid reason why, i for one, would be pleased to hear it.

From the Heart

2007-02-09T11:00:00.000Z

I was browsing the "your say" section of the BNP website and came across this letter:

"I have enjoyed reading the posts on this site, some are well researched, some passionate and some just down to earth common sense.All I wish to contribute is quite simple.. Please keep up the good work BNP. There are so many people out here who would love to join you but are scared to do so. In many peoples minds you are conceived as being a party of skin-headed thugs....Please work on changing this image and perception..The post from June S from Cambs was most encouraging...Thank you June.I am so fearful for those of us who are proud of being white working class or middle class people, who value our countries heritage and traditions and want to retain these things. Most of us are not 'skin-heads' or 'thugs'...we are normal (mostly Labour voting) people who live on the same council estates and housing areas as those who despise our country so much. I wish we had a BNP candidate in our area in the next elections.... I would shake his or her hand warmly and in full view of the neighbours!!"

This a not an untypical letter on the site but it struck me as a heartfelt plea from the writer. As any member or supporter will know the BNPs image is not at all as the media portray. The comment " There are so many people out here who would love to join you but are scared to do so" hurts me. All it takes people, is a little guts. A little guts to stand up and be counted. For your Country, for your Children and for your People. We do not have an infinite time to save our country and every day wasted is a day lost forever - lost to apathy or to the fear of sticking your head above the parapet. I would urge you who are not party members to look inside yourself, find a little guts, and join the BNP and become active in saving our once great nation from the wreckers currently residing in their ivory towers.

To quote "The day may come when the courage of men fails and we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship - but it is not this day! This day we fight!" Well my friends, the fighting has started in earnest and we in the BNP need your help to win!

William Shakespeare"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers...".(King Henry's call to arms of the English army before the battle of Agincourt)

Not so Safe now?

2007-02-09T10:36:00.000Z

I have just read the latest bye-election results from Bedworth. The BNP polling 31.2% of the votes in a Nu-Labour "safe" seat! (not so safe now, eh boys?). The results are:

Valerie Richardson (Lab) 658.
Alwyn Deacon (British National Party) 546.
Damon Brown (Con) 301.
Alice Field (Lib Dem) 119.
David Lane (English Democrats) 75.
Vanessa Casey (Save Our NHS) 43.
Nigel Lanigan (UK Independence Party) 8.

For the BNP standing here for the first time the results are astonishingly good, but not surprising, as Great Britains free people shake themselves from the apathy and slumber of the last decades of the old three party rule. It goes to show that if committed members and activists work hard in a given area we can sweep broad swathes through this country of ours and begin to regain our freedoms and the democracy we once took as a given. Of course, i realise that we did not win this election, but from a standing start in a previously unchallenged ward to a close second place well ahead of the Conservatives and Lib-Dead, shows we can effectively challenge all mainstream and minority parties. Vote BNP in the May elections and start down the road of being a first class citizen in a first class country again! YOUR COUNTRY! YOUR VOTE! VOTE BNP!

Absolutely Mental

2007-02-02T16:09:00.000Z

The Muslim community must be laughing all the way to the mosque in the wake of the latest anti-terror arrests. After the arrest of nine muslim terror suspects, the lunatics running the asylum that passes for Birmingham police handed out 5000 leaflets to muslims to "calm anger" in the area. And you might be forgiven for thinking that they have every reason to be angry. After all, if nine men in my home town were arrested on terror charges i would be angry too. But, no - they are not angry that they have home-grown terror suspects living with and near them, but as usual claim that muslims were being singled out by officers! I cant believe the kid gloves these invaders are handled with by the powers that be. They will never learn that the muslim communities must be treated the same as other communities. They want sharia law, they want us out of Iraq (so do i for different reasons), they force marriage upon their young people (and B.liars band of traitors have even discarded proposed new laws against that abomination), they slaughter food inhumanely (do not believe the "one cut across the throat" rubbish spouted in the press - have a look at my earlier article "sweetness and light"), often in conditions that would have you and i imprisoned so quickly you wouldnt even have time to say "mad mullah". And talking of mad mullahs, we have still heard nothing from the authorities regarding the arrest and deportation of the cast of the recent "Dispatches" documentary! Its as if they think its all going to go away if they keep their heads buried! A local councillor calls them the "ostrich" parties and with good reason!

North Somerset Council, obviously home to a large proportion of "care in the community" placements, have announced that it wants schoolchildren to wear burkas and hijabs in R.E. lessons "to help them understand islam"! Other ideas they have sent to schools include visits to a muslim exhibition where our kids can "try on" hijabs, niqabs and burkas as well as make their own prayer beads! They would also be taught to write their names in arabic and learn about the quran!
I would hope any decent parent will be up in arms about this traitorous action.
I remember years ago one of my daughters came home from school excited about a trip to a mosque in a nearby town and burst into tears when i told her there was no way on earth she was going. I withdrew her from R.E. at that school and had stern words with the headmistress about her liberal attitide to false religions. My daughter is now grown up and says i made the right decision.
What about this?
How about taking muslim schoolchildren on a trip to a church where they can "try on" nuns habits, atlar boys cassocks, make their own rosary beads, write their names in gaelic and learn about the bible? Dont forget you saw it here first! But dont hold your breath.................

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"We shall go on till the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island what ever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches and we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We will never surrender".
(Extract from speech delivered on 13th May 1940)

Tagged Like Cattle...

2007-02-01T14:32:00.000Z

ID cards are one of my pet hates, with nothing guaranteed to boil my blood faster than someone who says "if youve nothing to hide...." . There is a link on the site to the no2id campaign which i urge people to visit. It is not too long now before the first cards are issued ( i believe 2008?) and i for one will NOT be getting one! There are many arguments against this insidious form of tagging for all and i found this article below to sum up nicely. The no2id site has a pledge system to form a fighting fund to defend the prosecutions of Freeborn Britons that will follow as the government try to cow us into accepting this monstrous invasion into the lives of the indigenous free British. If enough people refuse then, as with Thatchers poll tax, the ID card law will be unenforceable.

" Many people have written at length and eloquently about the arguments against ID cards. Arguements put for ID cards have been changed and lies told without so much as a flicker of conscience from a government of utter liars who have all but destroyed our way of life and our culture and nation as they wreck our Constitution and implement their modern version of the Napoleonic Code where the State turns from Protector to Warden. Modern Britain is little short of a comfortable open prison. That the Government with a record of utter fiscal profligacy refuses to tell us what it will steal from us in order to pay for this idiocy is sufficient itself to make one reject the ID card. But despite these and the many other cogent arguments about the restriction of our historic Liberties and this draconian and dishonest imposition on us by the State, one factor which is the clincher for me has been swept under the carpet by all parties. This is the total impossibility of ID cards to provide any protection or security from terrorists or determined parasites. The reality is this. New Labour under Blair has allowed virtually uncontrolled immigration and has taken no measure to repatriate illegal immigrants or economic asylum seekers. The poison in their incompetence is that they allowed thousands of people into the country who arrived without ANY form of identification and unknown numbers of illegal immigrants with false papers. Many of the unsuccessful asylum seekers who should have been deported within 24 hours simply melted away into society. But not mainstream society. They melted into their own cultural and racial groups. One of the consequences of multiculturalism as provided by Gramsci and New Labour is virtually zero integration as multiculturalism is best defined as failed integration. Woefully late, bodies such as the CRE have lamented this but the horse left the stable years ago. We have groups of what can only be described as an admixture of parasites and our mortal enemies living amongst us and the idea that ID cards can somehow protect us from them is so spectacularly stupid as to suggest insanity on the part of those who propose it.An uncontrolled Department for Immigration has employed a disproportionate number of foreigners and their descendants in sensitive positions and this has allowed for the massive proliferation of false driving licenses, NHS cards and passports to be available on the black market. The situation is beyond rescue until and unless a massive deportation program is implemented. The British people, now so cowed by a communist school system and hideously anti British Broadcasting Corporation are by and large too frightened to say that the Emperor not only has no clothes but he is politically leprous, shedding any vestiges of truth or probity with each step he takes. It is the RESPONSIBILTY OF ALL BRITISH PEOPLE who know who they are and where they came from to refuse to take what can only be considered to be a short step from the mark of the beast. If the British are as stupid as I think they are, they will roll over and play dead and do as they are told given that so many now depend on the State to feed and clothe them either as employees or grateful beggars. But if they have any backbone then ID cards will prove to be New Labour's demise and their very own Poll Tax."
Peter Watson
Dorset February 15, 2006

Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) - american philosopher & poet
"By this sacredness of individuals, the English have in seven hundred years evolved the principles of freedom".

Retirement Bonus

2007-02-01T13:07:00.000Z

RETIREMENT BONUS PAYMENTS:
If this doesn't make you laugh, you have had a humour bypass!

The Army found they had too many officers and decided to offer an early retirement bonus. They promised any officer who volunteered for retirement a bonus of £1,000 for every inch measured in a straight line between any two points in his body. The officers got to choose what those two points would be. The first officer who accepted asked that he be measured from the top of his head to the tip of his toes. He was measured at six feet and walked out witha bonus of £72,000. The second officer who accepted was a little smarter and asked to be measured from the tip of his outstretched hands to his toes. He walked out with £96,000.The third one was a noncommissioned officer, a grizzled old Sergeant who, when asked where he would like to be measured replied, "From the tip of my privates to my testicles." It was suggested by the pension man that he might want to reconsider, explaining about the nice big checks the previous two officers had received. But the old NCO insisted and they decided to go alongwith him providing the measurement was taken by a medical officer. The medical officer arrived and instructed the NCO to "drop 'em," which he did. The medical officer placed the tape measure on the tip of the NCOs privates and began to work back. "Dear Lord!" he suddenly exclaimed, "Where are your testicles?" The old NCO calmly replied, "South Georgia in the Falklands."

Bad taste i know, but it made me laugh.

Andy Rooney on CBS Sixty Minutes

2007-02-01T11:04:00.000Z

This was sent to me by an American friend who is aware and sympathetic to the problems we face here. However, although many of their laws allow more freedom of speech, they still have the marxist inspired Political Correctness to contend with. I am told this is not a transcript of everyday viewing!

" Surprised CBS let him get away with this even though he's right AMEN ANDY ROONEY ! Right on, Andy Rooney! Andy Rooney said on "60 Minutes" a few weeks back:

I don't think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers. The only things I can think of that are truly discriminatory are things like the United Negro College Fund, Jet Magazine, Black Entertainment Television, and Miss Black America. Try to have things like the United Caucasian College Fund, Cloud Magazine, White Entertainment Television, or Miss White America; and see what happens...Jesse Jackson will be knocking down your door. Guns do not make you a killer. I think killing makes you a killer. You can kill someone with a baseball bat or a car, but no one is trying to ban you from driving to the ball game. I believe they are called the Boy Scouts for a reason, that is why there are no girls allowed. Girls belong in the Girl Scouts! ARE YOU LISTENING MARTHA BURKE? I think that if you feel homosexuality is wrong, it is not a phobia, it is an opinion. I have the right "NOT" to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird, or tick me off. When 70% of the people who get arrested are black, in cities where 70% of the population is black, that is not racial profiling, it is the Law of Probability. I believe that if you are selling me a milkshake, a pack of cigarettes, a newspaper or a hotel room, you must do it in English! As a matter of fact, if you want to be an American citizen, you should have to speak English! My father and grandfather didn't die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born in to come over and disrespect ours. I think the police should have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you threaten them after they tell you to stop. If you can't understand the word "freeze" or "stop" in English, see the above lines. I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you are qualified for any special loan programs, government sponsored bank loans or tax breaks, etc., so you can open a hotel, coffee shop, trinket store, or any other business. We did not go to the aid of certain foreign countries and risk our lives in wars to defend their freedoms, so that decades later they could come over here and tell us our constitution is a living document; and open to their interpretations. I don't hate the rich I don't pity the poor. I know pro wrestling is fake, but so are movies and television. That doesn't stop you from watching them. I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it ticks you off, go and invent the next operating system that's better, and put your name on the building. It doesn't take a whole village to raise a child right, but it does take a parent to stand up to the kid; and smack their little behinds when necessary, and say "NO!" I think tattoos and piercing are fine if you want them, but please don't pretend they are a political statement. And, please, stay home until that new lip ring heals. I don't want to look at your ugly infected mouth as you serve me French fries! I am sick of "Political Correctness." I know a lot of black people, and not a single one of them was born in Africa ; so how can they be "African-Americans"? Besides, Africa is a continent. I don't go around saying I am a European-American because my great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather was from Europe I am proud to be from America and nowhere else And if you don't like my point of view, tough... I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , AND TO THE REPUBLIC, FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL! It is said that 86% of Americans believe in God. Therefore I have a very hard time understanding why there is such a problem in having "In God We Trust" on our money and having "God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. Why don't we just tell the 14% to Shut Up and BE QUIET!!!

Thousands of miles away and still rings bells here..................

William Shakespeare
"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers...".
(King Henry's call to arms of the English army before the battle of Agincourt)

Cameroons Twitching

2007-02-01T10:14:00.000Z

Apparently, David "hug a hoodie" Cameroon is alive and twitching and spouting the type of nonsense i would more likely associate with Two-jags Prescott. This person ( i cant bring myself to call him a man) has launched a diatribe against many elements in our island home, most notably the BNP, and dares to compare us with the home-grown terrorists and radicals from the muslim community. Excuse me? For a moment there i thought he was drawing a parallel between a legitimate political party and people who want to take over our country by any means available including terrorism. My God! He is! As far as i am aware the BNP do not fly planes into tower-blocks, blow up buses and trains, inhumanely slaughter animals while chanting payers, beat women or advocate the killing of homosexuals. It is certainly not in the BNP manifesto this year so perhaps he has an old copy?
Additionally many members of the BNP enjoy the occasional packet of pork scratchings, so how we mirror radical muslims is beyond me.
Do you think we are starting to see yet another smear campaign against the BNP beginning to sprout as we head towards the may elections? Heaven forbid! We live in a democracy, right?

To quote Cameroon "The best answer to ignorance like this is a good education." Seems to me like you should enrol promptly Dave, i believe there are courses on living in the real world starting in september at an ethnically enriched and diversified school near you. Or would you go private?
I believe that this fools comments will lose the CONservatives even more votes and expose this twitching poppinjay for the traitor to the British people that he is. I understand that Cameroon, speaking at the New Testament Church of God in Handsworth, was due to say that many barriers to integration are the fault of politicians. But he didnt - now theres a surprise! Now almost a trademark of Cameroons press releases is the comment "he was due to say/speak/dicuss etc" on some hard-hitting topic, but he never does. All piss and wind is our Dave, with no style or substance. Hmmmm....who else does that description remind me of?

English news paper headline
"Fog in Channel - Continent cut off".

Comments

2007-01-27T10:02:00.000Z

Thanks to all you readers who have taken the time to comment on various postings, it is appreciated. To answer a couple of questions -

Yes the friends i stayed with over Christmas have joined the party! Onward and upward!

I do not believe that muslims should be allowed to wear any religous garb they like as some of it causes divisions within communities and has allowed fleeing suspects to escape justice.

Muslims Pushing Again

2007-01-23T16:37:00.000Z

A twelve year old student has been banned from wearing a Muslim veil in lessons because it is not seen as uniform, which seems reasonable to me.
The girl, who goes to a Buckinghamshire school, has been asked to stop wearing her niqab, a veil that covers the face usually leaving only the eyes visible (assuming it is a female as it would not be the first time a male had used one - remember the fleeing "alleged" bomber?).
The school is now facing a court battle about whether she can wear the veil and could be left with a £500,000 legal bill.
The pupil and her father, who do not want to be named (now theres a surprise), are taking their case to court through a judicial review next month, on legal aid (thats you and me paying). The Muslim pupils at the school are allowed to wear a hijab, a scarf which covers the head, but not a full niqab.
Buckinghamshire Council , responsible for the county's schools, are in talks with the family to try to stop the case going to court. The girl, it is reported, is having lessons at home. This is being paid for by the school (for "paid for by the school" read "paid for by the taxpayer"- you and me!).
Apparently, wycombe MP Paul Goodman has written to Alan Johnson, the Secretary of State for the Department of Education and Schools asking for a meeting.
He has said its right that the school should take the religious requirements of its Muslim pupils into account. "It already does so by allowing students to wear the hijab or headscarf, a policy on which it has consulted. It's worth noting that the vast majority of Muslim women in my constituency don't wear the niqab or veil."
"I gather that the school maintains on educational and security grounds that its students shouldn't wear the niqab. I support the school one hundred per cent."
The Council has said it cannot fork out taxpayers money on the case, and the DfES said it does not comment on individual cases (where have i heard that before?). But Mr Goodman thought the two authorities could help.
He added: "I believe that the Department of Education and Schools and Buckinghamshire Council should support the school in principle, and should work together to help fund this court case."
Marion Clayton, county council cabinet member for achievement and learning, said: "I can confirm that a parent has asked for a judicial review regarding his daughter not being allowed to attend a Buckinghamshire school wearing a niqab. A hearing is expected shortly to decide whether that review should go ahead.
"The school and parent have asked for anonymity. Neither the school nor this council feel it is appropriate to comment on the issues of the case until the review, if any, has taken place. We have been working with the school throughout to try and achieve a resolution in the best interests of the pupil and the school."
Now correct me if im wrong, but didnt we have a similar situation a year or so back in Luton? A court case costing a shedload of taxpayers money with no winners? Eh Begum lad. In that instance the girl "lost" her case to wear some obscure item of clothing. These meetings and consultations are a waste of time (surely these people have more important things to be getting on with than being seen to be pandering to the latest Muslim demand, for that is what it is) and the only winners are the legal teams. The Muslim communities are continually pushing at the boundaries, testing the waters of Britain, and pushing further with every concession they receive from our government who are too stupid to realise it will never stop until Britain is an Islamic state.
The BNP would ban the wearing of the full face veil in public places like schools - its divisive to community relations and makes terrorism and illegal immigration easy. VOTE BNP!

Jeremy Paxman - Political analyst & tv presenter
"Those countries which do best in the world - the ones that are safe and prosperous - have a coherent sense of their own culture".
(Extract from his book "The English")

Forget Big Brother - The Real Hate Was Here..........

2007-01-23T13:09:00.000Z

So is Celebrity Big Brother racist? Who gives a damn? The real racism that week was aired on Channel 4s Dispatches programme where we were treated to the unedifying sight of various muslim preachers of hate (for that is what they are) calling for Jihad against the infidel (thats you and me, folks). I waited with baited breath for the powers that be to spring into action and arrest them on any one of a dozen charges...........................and im still waiting. Big Brothers name calling "racism" was no doubt used as a distraction from the real extremists exposed within the muslim communities, even to the extent of questions being raised in parliament, keeping the chattering classes busy with another red herring, rather than addressing the real issues. Not surprisingly there was no condemnation by muslim "community leaders" or by any members of our government. I understand that some of these mosques are either wholly or partly publicly funded and yet again NO QUESTIONS were raised by anybody with access to the purse strings! To my mind all monies should be withdrawn immediately until the muslim communities get their house in order. In addition all footage collected by channel 4 should be passed to the police for further investigation prior to criminal proceedings being issued against these extremist preachers of hate. I could rail on but those of you who have seen the programme will know how much vile hatred was spewed our way during the programme. For those of you who have not seen it, it is available here : http://hotair.com/archives/2007/01/15/video-dispatches-undercover-mosque/

John Milton (1643) - English poet
"Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live".

The Crusades - Our History

2007-01-18T18:21:00.000Z

Misconceptions about the Crusades are all too common. The Crusades are generally portrayed as a series of holy wars against Islam led by power-mad popes and fought by religious fanatics. According to Muslims they are a stain on the history of the Church in particular and Western civilization in general. The Crusaders introduced aggression to the peaceful Middle East and then deformed the enlightened Muslim culture, leaving it in ruins?
So what is the truth about the Crusades? Much can said with certainty. For starters, the Crusades to the East were in every way defensive wars. They were a direct response to Muslim aggression—an attempt to turn back or defend against Muslim conquests of Christian lands.
Christians in the eleventh century were not fanatics. Muslims really were gunning for them.
Islam was born out of war and grows the same way. From the time of Mohammed the means of Muslim expansion was always the sword. Muslim thought divides the world into two spheres, the World of Islam and the World of War. Christianity—and for that matter any other non-Muslim religion—has no abode. Christians and Jews can be tolerated within a Muslim state under strict Muslim rule. But in traditional Islam, Christian and Jewish states must be destroyed and their lands conquered. When Mohammed was waging war against Mecca in the seventh century, Christianity was the dominant religion. It spanned the entire Mediterranean, including the Middle East, where it was born. The Christian world, therefore, was a prime target for the earliest caliphs, and it would remain so for Muslim leaders for the next thousand years and beyond, even up to today.
The warriors of Islam struck out against the Christians shortly after Mohammed’s death. They were extremely successful. Palestine, Syria, and Egypt—once the most heavily Christian areas in the world—quickly succumbed. By the eighth century, Muslim armies had conquered all of Christian North Africa and Spain. In the eleventh century, the Seljuk Turks conquered Asia Minor (modern Turkey), which had been Christian since the time of St. Paul. The Byzantine Empire, was reduced to little more than Greece. In desperation, the emperor in Constantinople sent word to the Christians of western Europe asking them to aid their fellow Christians in the East.
That is what gave birth to the Crusades. They were not the born of an ambitious pope or fanatical knights but as a response to more than four centuries of conquests in which Muslims had already captured two-thirds of the old Christian world. At some point, Christianity as a faith and a culture had to defend itself or be overun by Islam. The Crusades were that defense.
Pope Urban II called upon the Knights of Christendom to push back the Muslims at the Council of Clermont in 1095. The response was tremendous. Many thousands of Christian warriors took the vow of the cross and prepared for war.
Urban II gave the Crusaders two aims which would remain central to the Crusades for centuries. The first was to rescue the Christians of the East. The Crusade was seen as an errand of mercy to right a terrible wrong. As Pope Innocent III wrote to the Knights Templar, "You carry out in deeds the words of the Gospel, ‘Greater love than this hath no man, that he lay down his life for his friends.’"
The second goal was the liberation of Jerusalem and the other places made holy by the life of Christ. Medieval Crusaders saw themselves as pilgrims, performing acts of righteousness on their way to the Holy Sepulcher. The reconquest of Jerusalem was not colonialism but an act of restoration.
It is often assumed that the central goal of the Crusades was forced conversion of the Muslim world. Nothing could be further from the truth. From the perspective of medieval Christians, Muslims were the enemies of Christ and His Church. It was the Crusaders’ task to defeat and defend against them. That was all. Muslims who lived in Crusader-won territories were generally allowed to retain their property and livelihood, and always their religion. Indeed, throughout the history of the Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem, Muslims far outnumbered the Christians. It was not until the 13th century that the Franciscans began conversion efforts among Muslims. But these were mostly unsuccessful and finally abandoned. In any case, such efforts were by peaceful persuasion, not the threat of violence, as characterised by the Muslim occupations.
The Crusades were wars. Like all warfare, the violence was brutal (although not as brutal as modern wars).
By any reckoning, the First Crusade was a long shot. There was no leader, no chain of command, no supply lines, no detailed strategy. It was simply thousands of warriors marching deep into enemy territory, committed to a common cause. Many of them died, either in battle or through disease or starvation. It was a rough campaign, one that seemed always on the brink of disaster. Yet it was miraculously successful. By 1098, the Crusaders had restored Nicaea and Antioch to Christian rule. In July 1099, they conquered Jerusalem and began to build a Christian state in Palestine. The joy in Europe was unbridled. It seemed that the tide of history, which had lifted the Muslims to such heights, was now turning.
But it was not. When we think about the Middle Ages, it is easy to view Europe in light of what it became rather than what it was. The colossus of the medieval world was Islam, not Christendom. The Crusades are interesting largely because they were an attempt to counter that trend. But in five centuries of crusading, it was only the First Crusade that significantly rolled back the military progress of Islam. It was downhill from there.
When Edessa fell to the Muslim Turks and Kurds in 1144AD there was an enormous groundswell of support for a new Crusade in Europe. It was led by Louis VII of France and Conrad III of Germany. It failed miserably. Most of the Crusaders were killed along the way. Those who made it to Jerusalem only made things worse by attacking Muslim Damascus, which formerly had been a strong ally of the Christians. In the wake of such a disaster, Christians across Europe were forced to accept not only the continuing growth of Muslim power but the belief that God was punishing the West for its sins.
Crusading in the late twelfth century, therefore, became a total war effort. Every person, no matter how weak or poor, was called to help. Warriors were called to risk their lives for the defense of the Christian East. On the home front Christians were called to support the Crusades through prayer, fasting, and alms. Yet still the Muslims grew in strength. Saladin had forged the Muslim East into a single entity, all the while preaching Jihad against the Christians. In 1187AD at the Battle of Hattin, his forces wiped out the combined armies of the Christian Kingdom of Jerusalem and captured the precious relic of the True Cross. Defenseless, the Christian cities began surrendering one by one, culminating in the surrender of Jerusalem on October 2. Only a tiny handful of Christian ports held out.
The response was the Third Crusade. It was led by Emperor Frederick I Barbarossa of the German Empire, King Philip II Augustus of France, and King Richard I Lionheart of England. The aged Frederick drowned while crossing a river on horseback, so his army returned home before reaching the Holy Land. After recapturing Acre, the king of France went home. The Crusade, by default, fell into Richard’s lap. A skilled warrior, gifted leader, and superb tactician, Richard I led the Christian forces to victory after victory, eventually reconquering the entire coast. But Jerusalem was not on the coast, and after two abortive attempts to secure supply lines to the Holy City, Richard at last gave up. Promising to return one day, he struck a truce with Saladin that ensured peace in the region and free access to Jerusalem for unarmed pilgrims. The desire to restore Jerusalem to Christian rule and regain the True Cross remained intense throughout Europe.
The Crusades of the 13th century were larger and better organized. But they too failed, mainly due to political in-fighting. In the Fourth Crusade (1201-1204AD) the Crusaders captured, and sacked Constantinople, the greatest Christian city in the world. Pope Innocent III, who had previously excommunicated the Crusade, denounced the Crusaders. But there was little else he could do.
The remainder of the 13th century’s Crusades did little better. The Fifth Crusade (1217-1221) managed briefly to capture Damietta in Egypt, but the Muslims eventually defeated the army and reoccupied the city. Louis IX of France led two Crusades in his life. The first also captured Damietta, but Louis was forced to abandon the city. Although Louis was in the Holy Land for several years, spending freely on defensive works, he never achieved his fondest wish: to free Jerusalem. He was a much older man in 1270 when he led another Crusade to Tunis, where he died of disease. After Louis’s death, the ruthless Muslim leaders, Baybars and Kalavun, waged a brutal Jihad against the Christians in Palestine. By 1291, the Muslims succeeded in killing or ejecting the last of the Crusaders, thus erasing the Crusader kingdom from the map. Despite numerous attempts and many more plans, Christian forces were never again able to gain a foothold in the region until the 19th century.
One might think that three centuries of Christian defeats would have soured Europeans on the idea of Crusade. No. In one sense, they had little alternative. Muslim kingdoms were becoming more, not less, powerful in the 14th, 15th, and 16th centuries. The Ottoman Turks conquered not only their fellow Muslims, thus further unifying Islam, but also continued to press westward, capturing Constantinople and plunging deep into Europe itself. By the 15th century, the Crusades were no longer errands of mercy for a distant people but desperate attempts of the last remnants of Christendom to survive. Europeans began to ponder the real possibility that Islam would finally achieve its aim of conquering the entire Christian world. That did not happen. But it very nearly did. In 1480, Sultan Mehmed II captured Otranto as a staging point for his invasion of Italy. But the sultan died shortly thereafter, and his plans died with him. In 1529, Suleiman the Magnificent laid siege to Vienna. If not for a run of freak rainstorms that delayed his progress and forced him to leave behind much of his artillery, it is virtually certain that the Turks would have taken the city. Germany would have been at their mercy.
Yet even as these close shaves were taking place, something else was brewing in Europe—something unprecedented in history. The Renaissance. Even while fighting for its life, Europe was preparing to expand on a global scale. The Reformation made Crusades unthinkable for many Europeans. In 1571, a Holy League, which was itself a Crusade, defeated the Ottoman fleet at Lepanto. Yet military victories like that remained rare. The Muslim threat was finally neutralized economically, as Europe grew in wealth and power. The once awesome and sophisticated Turks began to seem backward and pathetic—no longer worthy of a Crusade. The "Sick Man of Europe" limped along until the 20th century, when it finally collapsed, leaving behind the present mess of the modern Middle East.
Both the medieval and the modern soldier fight ultimately for their own world and all that makes it up. Both are willing to suffer enormous sacrifice, provided that it is in the service of something they hold dear, something greater than themselves. Admire the Crusaders or not, it is fact that the world we know today would not exist without their efforts. The ancient faith of Christianity, with its respect for women, not only survives but flourishes. Without the Crusades, it might well have been pounded into extinction.

Sir Winston Churchill (1874 - 1965)
"Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar."Churchill in his first broadcast as Prime Minister to the British people on the BBC - May 19, 1940, London.

Heckling of a Sanctimonious Sod

2007-01-18T15:15:00.000Z

I dont know whether this is a true story, but it sounds about right for Bonio............................

At a U2 concert in Glasgow , Bono asked the audience for some quiet. Then in the silence, he started to slowly clap his hands. Holding the audience in total silence, he said into the microphone, "Every time I clap my hands, a child in Africa dies" A voice from near the front pierced the silence........... "Well, stop f***ing doing it then!"

Sweetness and Light

2007-01-18T15:03:00.000Z

Halal meat? click the link - theres really nothing more to say. Barbaric and disgusting treatment. Basra or Bradford, the slaughter is the same.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/the-eid-festival-around-the-world-graphic-photos

"L" Battery Royal Horse Artillery at Nery (31st August - 1st September 1914)

2007-01-16T18:34:00.000Z

Further to my post outlining some Great British Military Actions, most since forgotten by all but a few and certainly NOT taught in our multi-culti schools (perish the thought of the British people being taught anything about their own countrys history! - these days its all Negroes and Nazis as my daughter tells me politely).
This post is a brief overview of one of these heroic (in the TRUE sense of the word and not as applied to any fool who can kick a ball!) actions dating from the First World War (1914 - 1918).

On 26th August 1914 General Alexander Von Kluck with the German First Army almost succeeded in encircling the British (II Corps) , after our French allies withdrew under heavy German pressure. Tough fighting ensued and II Corps were able to break free and resume the retreat to the Marne. Von Kluck was intent on destroying the BEF (British Expeditionary Force) and caught up with the British rearguards on 1st September in several towns and villages including Nery.
This last engagement whilst small in scale was to have far reaching consequences for the German First Army. Nery lies about 45 miles northeast of Paris. "L" Battery Royal Horse Artillery (RHA), The Queens Bays, 5th Dragoon Guards and the 11th Hussars were picketed down for the night. German cavalry were observed in the early hours by an 11th Hussars patrol and within minutes the village was under heavy weapons fire from German advance elements, between 600 and 800 yards away, consisting of artillery, rifle and machinegun fire.
The British units could not move under such concentrated fire and were obliged to remain at their posts until help arrived. The enemy were Von Klucks 4th cavalry, screening the right flank of the german advance. Just prior to the german arrival "L" Battery had hitched up in preparation of an early morning move-out and the german artillery batteries immediately targetted four of their twelve guns onto the "L" battery positions. Under a firestorm of shells and small arms fire from the german artillery and dismounted cavalry squadrons, many of "L" batterys men and horses were decimated in minutes. Many of the British gunners were killed before they could respond and the situation was desperate (remember these boys were the rearguard protecting the allied retreat).
With a shout of "Come on! Whos for the guns?", Captain E.K.Bradbury along with three subalterns and the few remaining gunners still on their feet, managed to unlimber three guns and swing them round to face the enemy. Bradbury and Sgt D.Nelson manned one, Lieutenants Cambell and Mundy the second and Lieutenant Gifford and some gunners manned the third. Every round had to fetched from over twenty yards of exposed ground, but there was no shortage of volunteers. Initially "L" batterys three guns verus the german four seemed reasonable odds, but Campbells gun was hit and wrecked and Campbell killed. Two subalterns ran to help Bradbury. Giffords gun received a direct hit, killing Gifford and most of the gunners and badly wounding the other crew of the third gun. Bradbury now face odds of four to one and he was supplied with ammunition by Gunner Darbyshire and Driver Osbourn. They must have inflicted some damage as the eight remaining german guns switched their fire on to the lone gun from "L" battery, as well as the initial four.
For an hour the lone British 13 pounder fired on, one versus twelve, in the midst of a death filled bombardment from the german gunners. One by one the ammunition carriers were hit and the rate of fire from the men at the muzzle became sporadic. By 07.15 AM only Bradbury and Sgt. Nelson (who was badly wounded) remained at the gun. Battery Sergeant-Major Dorrell ran under fire to join them. Bradbury left the gun to go for more ammunition and was mortally wounded. Nelson and Dorrell fired the last few rounds available and the gun fell silent. For a moment it looked like it was all for nothing. However the germans had been deprived of their local artillery cover (which had been engaged with "L" battery) and the British had launched a local counter-attack with two squadrons of the 5th Dragoon Guards, followed by "I" Battery RHA and the 4th British Cavalry Brigade along with infantry units. The Germans were routed, leaving eight of their guns abandoned.
British casualties from this action amounted to 135 officers and men, of which 5 officers and 49 other ranks were from "L" Battery. Captain Bradbury received the Victoria Cross (posthumously) as did Nelson and Dorrell. The battery won the Honour Title "Nery",and one of its guns is on display at the Imperial war Museum in London.

Arthur Wellesley (1769-1852) - the Duke of Wellington
"The scum of the earth. The mere scum of the earth".
(Describing his own army in the nineteenth century)

An Ants Tale - Bitter?

2007-01-15T10:31:00.000Z

After seeing "The Squirrel and the Grasshopper" article on the BNP and Me site, i dug this old one out of my files. I hope it entertains you.

The Ants Tale:
CLASSIC VERSION:The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, Building his house and laying up supplies for the winter.The grasshopper thinks he's a fool,and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed. The shivering grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold.
THE END

THE BRITISH VERSION:
The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks he's a fool, and laughs and dances and plays the summer away. Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed.(so far, so good, eh?). The shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be allowed to be warm and well fed while others less fortunate, like him, are cold and starving. The BBC shows up to provide live coverage of the shivering grasshopper, with cuts to a video of the ant in his comfortable warm home in Hampstead with a table laden with food. The Labour government are stunned that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so while others have plenty. The Liberal Party, the Respect Party, the Transvestites with Starving Babies Party, the Single Lesbian One Eyed Mothers Party, the Coalition against Poverty and the We Want What They Have Without Doing Anything To Earn It Party demonstrate in front of the ant's house. The BBC, interrupting a Rastafarian cultural festival special from Grimsby with breaking news, broadcasts them singing "We Shall Overcome." Ken Livingstone laments in an interview with Panorama that the Ant has got rich off the backs of grasshoppers, and calls for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his "fair share". In response, the Labour Government drafts the Economic Equity and Grasshopper Anti-Discrimination Act, backdated to the beginning of the summer. The ant's taxes are reassessed, and he is also fined for failing to hire grasshoppers as helpers. Without enough money to pay the fine and his newly imposed backdated taxes, his home is confiscated by Camden Council. The ant moves to France, and starts a successful AgriBiz company (funded by the EU), although within weeks, his business is threatened with compulsory purchase by the state unless he marries a French ant. The BBC later shows the now fat grasshopper finishing up the last of the ant's food, though Spring is still months away, while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around him because he hasn't bothered to maintain it. Inadequate government funding is blamed, Diane Abbot is appointed to head a commission of enquiry that will cost £10,000,000.00. The grasshopper is soon dead of a drug overdose; the Guardian blames it on the obvious failure of government to address the root causes of despair arising from social inequity. The abandoned house is taken over by a gang of immigrant spiders, praised by the government for enriching Britain's multicultural diversity, who promptly set up a marijuana growing operation and terrorize the community.
THE END

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"the Battle of Britain is about to begin... Let us therefore brace ourselves to our duties, and so bear ourselves that if the British Empire and its Commonwealth should last a thousand years, men will still say: This was their finest hour".
(Extract from speech delivered on 18th June 1940)

Excuse me Mr Brown?

2007-01-14T11:53:00.000Z

Gordon Browns comments regarding the Union of the UK would be laughable if they were not so serious.
Having jointly presided over 10 years of the systematic dismantling of Britain’s historic institutions, Brown is portraying himself as a champion of the Union and of Great Britain.
As usual for Labour, the reasons are motivated purely by self-interest and power-grabbing politics.
Firstly, the Scots are about to give the Labour party a bashing in the forthcoming elections to Scotland's parliament. The nationalists want to break away from the UK and would use election victory to push for their goal of an independent Scotland. If the results of the Scottish elections give a taste of what could happen in the Westminister elections in the next few years, Labour is in the mire. Due to the fact that the Labour party could not and would not again win a national election without its scottish power base, the situation is fast becoming desperate for them.
Secondly, being a scottish MP himself, he risks being seen as the emperor without clothes when he succeeds Tony Bliar as PM if the scots effectively tell England to ‘go forth and multiply‘. The English are already subjected to the inequity of the ‘West–Lothian’ issue whereby Scottish MPs vote on English matters that do not effect the Scots themselves (a total perversion of democracy).
The English are unlikely to ever want to be ruled-over by a Scots bigot if Scotland is fully devolved.
Further, under the Labour regime, Scotland has become a subsidised state, paid for by, you’ve guessed it, the English (over 60% of scottish funding is from English taxpayers!).
Labour hates England. It has been a characteristic of their years in power never to mention England. England, in the eyes of Britain’s marxist left, represents everything reprehensible about Britain’s past.
The more extreme left-wing intellectual types believe that the English have some kind of inbuilt natural characteristic that leans towards brutish expansionism and look to suppress the indigenous English at every given opportunity.
Labour might see themselves as progressive , but in this they have been driven by their own deep-set prejudice that sees the indigenous English as fair game at the bottom of the Labour pecking order.
The problem here is that talk of British nationalism is irrelevant without the English. Britain is a union of nations and England has always been its driving force.
Brown is not interested in Britain and not interested in its future in any other way than imposing his pseudo-Marxist world view. He is definitely not interested in us English. He cannot bring himself to say something nice about us.
The new Labour experiment has been all about the twin policies of selling our sovereignty to the EU and unbridled mass-immigration: Its intention has been to rid the country of national identity for good.
The EU has never made any pretence otherwise. Indeed, in Brussels they are mightily proud of the fact - has Brown not heard of the policy of splitting Europe into regions?
You would think Brown would be pleased to split up the Union. After all it was Labour that started the process with the tacit approval of our “European partners". They even tried to devolve the North East of England, until voters sent them packing with their tails between their legs (or does he think we have forgotten?)
Brown now also has the gall to speak of the shortcomings of multiculturalism: "What was wrong about multiculturalism was not the recognition of diversity but that it over-emphasised separateness at the cost of unity," he writes.
As if Brown and his party hadn’t invented and imposed it, without consulting us first.
As if the thing just happened on its own.
After ten years of Chancellor Brown, Britain has been subjected to remorseless tax and spend policies in order to re-engineer society to fit a marxist left-wing world view. The break up of the Union is just one of its inevitable consequences.
Now Brown is trying to paint himself as THE champion of British national identity and savior of the 300 year old union. I doubt if this calculated and blatant attempt to save his own backside will succeed.
For Brown to make such a song and dance over the Union indicates that the Labour rats are truly starting to sweat - here in England we have an opportunity in the May elections to give Labour a good kick in the ballots! Dont forget to vote! Vote BNP!

King Harold II (1022 - 1066AD)
"I will give him seven feet of English ground, or as much more as he may be taller than other men".
(When asked, before the Battle of Stamford Bridge, what he would offer the invading Norwegian King)

Dhimmocracy in Great Britain

2007-01-12T15:18:00.000Z

Many readers will be familiar with the story of the Medina (formerly Express) Dairy in Windsor and the recent racial disturbances relating to that site's misuse as a mosque and Islamic centre.The Medina Dairy chain is owned by Medina Property – a company that also owns Technor House – also on the same site. In early 2005 a planning Change of Use application was put before Windsor & Maidenhead Borough Council (WMBC) requesting that the status of Technor House be changed so as to allow its use as a mosque and Islamic centre. After due consideration and in the face of major local opposition to the proposal, the Council rejected the application. A little later the applicants lodged a request for an Appeal against WMBC’s decision with Labour’s Planning Inspectorate, based in Bristol. A public hearing was convened in Windsor for the autumn of last year. As an aside, because of concerns by some officials over possible “BNP disruption” (play the bogeyman card) , it was thought that a sizeable police presence at the hearing was appropriate! To cut a long story short - as they say, the decision of WMBC was overturned and permission granted to allow the use of Technor House as a mosque and Islamic education centre. Local people were far from pleased over the decision and this, together with the attitude of some at the dairy site, contributed to the later outbreak of violence. Rumours abound. One of the complaints subsequently voiced by angry residents opposed to the proposal is that they received precious little support from the local Tories. Another concerns Labour’s Fiona Mactaggart – the MP for neighbouring Slough – where indigenous Britons are in the minority. According to rumour Mactaggart wrote to the Planning Inspectorate in Bristol ahead of the Appeal hearing, to request that WMBC's decision be overturned and that permission be granted for the mosque and Islamic education centre! We can now confirm that this is no rumour - but a statement of fact! The text of Ms. Mactaggart's communication – received in July 2006 by the Planning Inspectorate – is as follows:

Dear Mr. P****, Re APP/T0335?A/1188984 Users of Diamond Road Mosque in my constituency have asked for my support on this matter which I am pleased to give. I rarely intervene in small scale planning matters, especially when they are not within my constituency (or to help my own countrymen?) but I believe that this proposal for an Islamic community and educational centre could help community cohesion, reduce traffic congestion and enable the Muslim community of Windsor to participate more fully in the economic life of the town to the mutual benefit of the town and the community. At present many Muslims in the Windsor area come to Slough to worship and for Islamic education, putting our resources under strain and adding to traffic congestion on the roads between Windsor and Slough especially on Friday. Tackling these difficulties would enhance community cohesion as would the offer made by the developers to use the centre to enhance learning across and between religions.Recent figures suggest that Muslim men in this area have experienced an increase in unemployment, unlike all other local communities where there has been employment growth. Enabling people to pray locally helps them successfully to participate in the labour market in a way which may help to reduce the risk of unemployment in this group (Is it me or is that just so much nonsense you have to re-read several times to confirm it is indeed nonsense?). While I recognise that the original reason for refusal was a commendable desire on the part of Windsor and Maidenhead Council to preserve appropriate space for industry and business I believe that this argument is also important to securing a successful future for employment in Windsor. This is an unusual application. It is rare for the resources, a site and a need in this field to come together well and in these circumstances I would urge you to consider that the case for departing from the original decision would be good for the whole community of Windsor and its economic and social success.

Unbelieveable stuff. I was ware of the problems at the Medina site, including a number of assaults on local indigenous people by muslims, to which our Dhimmi police turned a blind-eye, but to have an MP from another constituency interfere (for that is what it is) and use her political clout to help get the decision overturned is appalling. I wonder what percentage of her constituency is muslim? New Labour in action - NOT working for Britain!

Thanks to the BNP website - link on left

The Religion of Peace

2007-01-08T15:29:00.000Z

Many European countries were occupied by Muslims over the centuries (either Arabs, Moors, or Ottomans (Turks): Spain for 800 years, Portugal 600 years, Greece 500 years, Sicily 300 years, Serbia 400 years, Bulgaria 500 years, Romania 400 years, Hungary 150 years... Italy, Austria, Bosnia, Croatia, Wallachia, Albania, Moldavia, Armenia, Georgia, Poland, the Ukraine, and eastern and southern Russia - they were all battlefields where Islam conquered or was conquered in violent conflicts marked by cruelty and a fearful loss of life, spread over considerably more than a thousand years... and was only stopped in France (That Islam did not capture all of Europe and wipe out Christianity is owing in part to the Franks' Mayor of the Palace, Charles Martel, his sturdy Merovingian knights and courageous infantry. On October 10, 732AD, Charles met the Islamic invaders between Poiters and Tours in battle. The Franks stood like a wall and the Muslims eventually withdrew defeated. Their leader, Abd-ar-Rahman was killed. In their rout, the Arabs suffered heavy losses of men and equipment. Europe would remain Christian territory.)

European history has remained fixed on the Christian Crusades of the 11th to the 13th centuries, largely ignoring these Muslim attacks and invasions. When accusing the West of imperialism, muslims are obsessed with the crusades, but do not mention their own longer and more gruesome Jihad.
Their leaders, the Caliphs, Sultans, and Ayatollahs had the same powers of any dictator, including their heroes Suleiman the Magnificent and Saladin.
And they still have the same total political and religious power in most Muslim countries today: Gaddafi in Libya, the Kings in Jordan and Syria, in the Sudan, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Morocco, Pakistan, Afghanistan, even in Palestine. Most of these countries have "third world" status, their rulers using their huge oil gained wealth for personal use and for furthering the cause of Islam.
Today they do not have enough resources to conquer their neighbouring countries, nor the world, which is their ultimate aim, and they use instead terrorism and suicide bombers.

However, Muslim wars are still raging worldwide:
The Muslim Palestinians have a continuing war of terrorism against Israel. In the Sudan the Muslim government of the north have already killed over one million Christians in the south. Algeria is wracked by bitter fighting between Islamic Fundamentalists and the military. Nigeria is in the midst of a civil war between Muslims and Christians. In Kenya the Islamic Party has declared Holy War on the government. Colonel Gaddafi and his Libyan army have carried out military operations into Chad, and, like Afghanistan and Iran, Libya is a base for terrorists. In Turkey (looking to join the EU) the secular Muslim government is being challenged by the militant Refah Islamic Party. War also rages between Christian Ethiopia and Muslim Eritrea. The fighting between Christian Armenians and Muslim Azerbaijans (with 35,000 casualties), after which tiny Armenia was shrunk further because of territory gained by the "breeding-with-a-vengeance" Muslim population. A war between the Christian Serbs and the Muslim Albanians could spark at any moment. Muslims in Chechnya, Daghestan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan have ignited insurrection against the pro-Russian regimes. Muslims in Indonesia are forcing Christians of all denominations to convert to Islam or have their throats cut. Thousands upon thousands of Christians have been first forcibly converted, and then sexually mutilated with knives and razor blades to make them conform to Muslim "standards". Afterwards, they are enslaved to their local Muslim chieftain. This is not some aberration of Islam, but business as usual for all but the "moderate" factions. They have a history of murder, terror, lies and brainwashing to advance their cause of global conversion and subjugation... Their Jihad!

Unfortunately, most people aren’t aware of this murderous philosophy, or they find it too monstrous to believe.

But the concept of Islam throughout the centuries has always been this:

1- Embrace Islam, become our brethren and you will have what we have.
2- If you refuse that, you will be obligated to pay tribute with humiliation (the Jizya or poll tax). Dhimmitude.
3- Or War, terrorism and suicide bombers.

This is Islam in the 21st century.

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"When I warned them (the French Government) that Britain would fight on alone whatever they did, their generals told their Prime Minister and his divided cabinet, "In three weeks England will have her neck wrung like a chicken." Some chicken! Some neck!".
(Speech to Canadian Parliament 1941)

New Post

2007-01-05T18:15:00.000Z

There is a new post below "Standing Our Ground - Great Military Actions" below - i am still new to blogging and it has gone to a lower section of the page. No doubt i will have a few hiccups as i find my way around! Tony.

Our Government Supports England

2007-01-05T17:20:00.000Z

To hear our "illustrious leaders" talk (ho hum),they are committed to helping us and always endeavour to do their best for our country. I am (as usual) completely sceptical of anything that is "for your own good", or indeed any sentiments of a similar ilk coming from any politician. I have here some quotations from some nu-labour and conservative sell-outs. Have a read, draw your own conclusions as to the integrity of these traitorous appeasers and vote them out! We hear time and time again about how we are a multicultural nation with all the benefits that such "diversity" brings ( which as any reader will know is a complete fabrication with regards to the benefits), but we English are NOT even a people according to these despicable traitors.

1 - John “Two Jags" Prescott - A fat Welsh Politician backing us to the hilt as normal.
“…there is no such nationality as English”

2 -Jack Straw – whilst Foreign Secretary
“The English are potentially very aggressive, very violent. We have used this propensity to violence to subjugate Ireland, Wales and Scotland. Then we used it in Europe and with our empire, so I think what you have within the UK is three small nations…who’ve been over the centuries under the cosh of the English. Those small nations have inevitably sought expression by a very explicit idea of nationhood. You have this very dominant other nation, England, 10 times bigger than the others, which is self-confident and therefore has not needed to be so explicit about its expression. I think as we move into this new century, people’s sense of Englishness will become more articulated and that’s partly because of the mirror that devolution provides us with and because we are becoming more European at the same time”.
Another one of our beloved leaders once again behind us 100%

3 - William Hague – July 1999
““These are not theoretical problems. They are alive and real, a ticking time bomb under the British constitution…The signs of an emerging English consciousness are all around us. Try to ignore this English consciousness or bottle it up and it will turn into a more dangerous English Nationalism that can threaten the future of the United Kingdom”
Another bright boy on our team. "A more dangerous English Nationalism" eh?

How dare these clowns purport to speak for the English people! How dare they show their faces as "men of the people"! They should hang their heads in shame for their anti-english sentiments ( Two-Jags can probably be partly excused as he has never had an original thought expressed with any semblance of eloquence, and was quite possibly unaware of the drivel he was spouting - it happens quite frequently, im told)

Am I Surprised?

2007-01-01T16:07:00.000Z

I have just had a festive few days away staying with old friends and family in rural Nottinghamshire. My wife and i had a great time with all the usual excesses that Christmas and the New Year brings. The dinner table talk (as usual) turned to politics. I make no secret of my BNP membership or my views, if asked, and these good people already knew my political leanings. They also agree with some of them, but thats as far as they have gone. What surprised me this time was they were adamant that they would be voting BNP in the forthcoming elections in May. After discussing some aspects of the party three of them pledged to become members immediately. They have no internet access and so i gave them a phone number which was called within a few hours (unfortunately message service only - forgot our people were probably celebrating too!). The point here is that these are normal, solid British people (which as any BNP member can tell you are the backbone of the party) who, after years of being drip-fed a constant stream of lies from whichever lame-duck party has been in power, have awoken!

Its almost de-riguer to these days in my local market-town pubs to talk politics and the BNP are almost always spoken about with respect. Where they are not it is usually (but not always) due to ignorance or pre-formed views from what has been a hostile media. The positive publicity from Nick and Marks aquittal, along with the Guardians "BNP Recruitment Supplement" (i cant believe we didnt have have to pay for that!) and the day to day work of activists throughout the year are paying off.

Finally a few thoughts on the last day or twos news items:
They hanged Saddam - i believe he was a bad man, BUT his trial was a farce and a disgrace to a "civilised" society. Yes, he should have hanged, but not as the result of an externally-driven show trial overseen by western powers.

We are invited to welcome the accession of two new member states to to the EU - our government have stuck an outwardly visible sticking plaster on our worries by "limiting" "unskilled" workers from these countries to 20,000. However there is NOTHING to stop these people from saying they are either tourists or self-employed and coming in anyway to dissappear into the black economy or be hired by unscrupulous employers looking to increase their profits. Even without this sham "limited immigration" another 20,000 immigrants will add yet more strain to our already overloaded infrastructure and will be yet again to the detriment of the indigenous British people.

Quote:
Gilbert K Chesterton (1874-1936) - English novelist and poet

"But we are the people of England; and we have not spoken yet. Smile at us, pay us, pass us by. But never forget".

A message of Hope for 2007

2006-12-27T12:55:00.000Z

Throughout the centuries this nation has stood many times as a shining beacon of light and inspiration to others against enemies from without. In this day and age much of the threat to our national identity and wellbeing comes from within. Much of this threat comes from traitorous politicians and their lickspittles who have the affront to call themselves British, and tell us that its all for our own good. We observe the creeping Islamification of our country, crime spiralling out of control and the politicisation of our police, town halls, schools, and the workplace. As we witness terror attacks within our borders from those our leaders call "British" (and who are NOT and never will be British - their allegiances lie elsewhere!), as we observe the government talking almost with pride about the number of terror plots they have managed to stop (so far, and as though THEY didnt bring this situation upon the British People!) and as though they have control over the situation, rather than the run of luck they are currently experiencing. As we observe all this it is easy to become despondent and feel that everything is against us as Nationalists.
However, my friends, look around you. To paraphrase Bob Dylan, the times they are a-changing. No longer are Nationalists feeling the need to pussy-foot around when speaking. The groundswell in the street is phenonmenal, with BNP ranks swelling weekly (against nu-labours own figures of a member lost every 20 minutes!), and people finally saying enough is enough! I believe the BNP will make great inroads in the 2007 elections (I myself hope to be a candidate) and will then be able to continue to swing the pendulum away from the liberal left bedwetters currently running our Townhalls and Shires. VOTE BNP!

To finish i include some quotations from some of our proud forefathers - i hope they inspire you as much as they do me.

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"What is our policy?... To wage war against a monstrous tyranny, never surpassed in the dark lamentable catalogue of human crime. What is our aim?... Victory... Victory at all costs. Victory in spite of all terror. Victory, however long and hard the road may be. For without victory, there is no survival".
(Extract from a speech delivered on May 13th 1940)

Charles Churchill (1731-1764) - English poet
"Be England what she will. With all her faults, she is my country still".

Lord Admiral Horatio Nelson
"England expects that every man will do his duty".
(Message to his men before the Battle of Trafalgar)

William Shakespeare
"Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead! In peace there's nothing so becomes a man as modest stillness and humility: But when the blast of war blows in our ears, Then imitate the action of the tiger; Stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, Disguise fair nature with hard favoured rage; Then lend the eye a terrible aspect. On, on you noblest English! Whose blood is fet from fathers of war-proof; Fathers that, like so many Alexanders, Have in these parts from morn till evening fought, And sheathed their swords for lack of argument. And you, good yeomen, Whose limbs were made in England, show us here the mettle of your pasture. I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips, Straining upon the start. The game's afoot: Follow your spirit; and upon this charge Cry "God for Harry! England and Saint George!".
(Henry V - Henry urges his men into the attack at the Siege of Harfleur)

Bleeding Us Dry ..........

2006-12-24T18:50:00.000Z

Something a bit lighter in vein as my last pre-christmas post. I have always wanted to have a rant at the taxman and this could be his reply to my letter:

H.M Customs and Excise
PO BOX --
-------n

Tax Ref …/……/….. 18-12-2006

Dear Mr ……,
Firstly, I must take issue with your description of our last correspondence as a "begging letter". It might perhaps be more properly referred to as a "tax return".
Secondly, your frustration at our adding "to the endless stream of faecal whining and panhandling spewed daily through the letterbox onto the doormat" has been noted. However, while i have not seen the other letters to which you refer, i would cautiously suggest that being from "Pauper councils, Lombardy pirate banking houses and pissant Gas-mongerers" might indicate that your decision to "file them next to the toilet in case of emergencies" is at best a little ill-advised.
It may be true that your taxes "go to shore up the liberal-blighted folly that is the Public Services in Britain. However, less than you imagine is spent on "junkets for brown-nosed lickspittles" and "Ilegal immigrants with boxes of matches and Sky TV".
A couple of points arising from your direct queries:
1: The reason we don’t simply write "muggins" on the envelope has to do with the vagaries of the British postal system.
2: You can rest assured that "sucking the blood of those with nothing left to give" has never been considered as a practise within Customs and Excise.
I trust this has helped. In the meantime, I ought to point out that even if you did choose to "give up the whole foul rat-race and go and live in a tepee in Scotland" you would still owe us the money.
Please forward it by return.

Yours Sincerely

A. Leech , Customer Relations

Happy Christmas and New Year to you all!

Standing our Ground - British Military Actions

2006-12-24T08:22:00.000Z

The concept of men selling their lives as dearly as possible forms an honoured part of of most national histories, Great Britain being no exception. It is also the basis of much military tradition. However the facts are that although all armies (remember Saddams Revolutionary Guard?) talk of fighting to the last man, such events are the exception rather than the rule. The phenomenon of the Last Stand can only be seen in a highly motivated environment, during times of total war or when feelings are very high. The phenonmenon has appeared time and time again throughout history, the earliest recorded example being the stand at the pass of Thermopylae by the Greeks against the Persians in 480BC when King Leoindas of Sparta and his bodyguuard of 300 Spartans refused to surrender and fought to the last man.
At the Battle of Hastings (see earlier post - The White Dragon of the English) when the rest of the English army had fled, King harolds housecarls fought to the bitter end in defence of their king and homeland.
During the Crusades the Knights Templar made it common knowledge to both friend and foe that they neither gave or accepted quarter (mercy/surrender). The Muslims reacted accordingly and after the Battle of Hattin in 1187AD some 200 captured Templar and Hospitaller Knights were executed immediately by beheading ( Sharia Law, anyone?).
At Marston Moor and Naseby during the English Civil War there were Royalist regiments who went down fighting rather than surrender to an enemy and way of life that they loathed and despised.
Remember that in these eras there was no disgrace in an honourable surrender (often offered) and that Last Stands were rare.
This started to change in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in the ages of permanent warfare and global expansion, and it is during these times that the Last Stand became a regular feature of war.
Much depends on the motivation of the men invlolved. Where does it come from? Anger? Fear? Espirit de Corps? Tradition? Beliefs? Loyalty? Hope of relief? Or self-sacrifice to help others?
Another factor to consider: Armies do not fight to the last man, nor do large formations. The units that do so are always relatively small compared to the overall conflict or battle. In other words a mans primary loyalties lie with those nearest to him. His "family" and friends - anything outside this group are relative strangers and therefore have little or an impersonal loyalty due.
Some British examples of this:
The Parachute Regiment at Arnhem (17th - 20th September 1944)
The 24th Regiment of Foot (later the South Wales Borderers) at Rorkes Drift and Isandlwana (22nd January 1879)
The 2nd Battalion of The Rifle Brigade at Outpost Snipe during the Second Battle of El Alamein (27th October 1942)
The 5th Battalion of the Hampshire Regiment at Sidi Nsir in Tunisia (26th February 1943)
The 2nd Battalion West Yorkshire Regiment at the Admin Box in Burma ((6th - 25th February 1944)
The Gloucestshire regiment, Royal Northumberland Fusiliers and the Royal Ulster Rifles at the Imjin in Korea (22nd - 25th April 1951)
"L" Battery Royal Horse Artillery at Nery (31st August 1914)

(Just out of interest, there were English, Scots and Irishmen fighting for freedom at the Alamo) (23rd February - 6th March 1836)

These battles have passed into British history because of the courage and resolve of those making the stand. With one exception the stand benefited the cause of those who made it. Most obviously, a rigid stand weakened the enemy, disrupted his plans and cost him time - all factors that could be used against him in subsequent engagements, both military and political. Even where a stand was "unsuccessful" the foes small, but frequently expensive tactical victory, was counter-productive as it would engender a burning desire for revenge among the comrades of the men and often in their homeland as well - important from a pyschological warfare aspect.

I will endeavour to cover some of these heroic British military actions over the next few months as most of them are not remembered today - yet in their day they were events that helped shape the British Nation.

Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"A nation which has forgotten its past can have no future."

Christmas Stories in 21st Century Britain

2006-12-23T19:21:00.000Z

Some of the more interesting Christmas related stories:First up, an example of what happens when foreign ethnic groups form enclaves, and then the locals bend over backwards trying to appease them because they're so scared of offending them. In this case the English head teacher of an 80% Muslim school removed the 'virgin' from Mary for Christmas celebrations so as not to offend Muslims. She clearly has no faith or she would never have sanctioned this. But what is even more embarrasing is that she has no knowledge about Islam, and it was the Muslims she was trying to placate. Muslims also believe Jesus was born from an immaculate conception. Why Jesus, a supposedly lesser prophet, was given that honour but Mohammed wasnt is one of the many bizarre contradictions of Islam, but the fact remains that this teacher was clueless. Another school decided to axe its christmas play altogether in favour of a celebration of a range of different faiths, including Judaism and Hinduism.
We were going to have another crass multi-cultural gimmick from channel 4 featuring a Muslim woman in full niqab giving the broadcaster's alternative Christmas message. However it seems the woman in question has stepped down after she saw the reaction to the announcement. But seeing as dozens of women in niqabs (Im assuming they are women....who knows whats under those Bat-outfits?) applied for the role i am sure they can come up with another one in time to save the day.
Aside from all the usual pc nonsense, this years BNP Christmas message was recorded from the Hebridean island of Iona, a key location in the establishment of the Christian tradition in these islands and a very special place at the centre of early Scottish political life; it is the burial grounds of kings and queens from Scotland, Ireland and Norway, a place of homage and reverence. In the 15 minute video, Nick Griffin gives some history of the island and reminds viewers about the erosion of the Christian tradition together with the replacement of the indigenous British population. The BNPtv clip can be downloaded via the BNP-TV link on the left.

Thanks to Victory or Death - link on left

A Small Victory

2006-12-23T18:54:00.000Z

Christians 1 - Lancashire Police 0 - Taxpayer?

A Christian couple questioned by police for describing homosexuality as "morally wrong" have won a £10,000 payout and an apology.
Helen and Joe Roberts were reported to Lancashire Constabulary last December after they asked Wyre Borough Council to display Christian literature alongside leaflets about gay rights.
The council refused, which prompted Mrs Roberts to make a telephone complaint in which she described homosexual practice as "morally wrong".
Two police officers then visited the Roberts' home, in Fleetwood, and questioned them for an hour and 20 minutes about their moral beliefs.
The couple took legal action against Lancashire Constabulary and Wyre Borough Council for infringing their freedom of expression and religious belief, and a High Court hearing was due to take place next month.
The Roberts have now agreed to drop the action after both the police and council apologised and offered £10,000, which will be donated to charity, plus legal costs.
In a written apology, Lancashire Police accepted they should have made proper inquiries before deploying officers.
The apology states: "The decision to send the officers was made after consideration. However, on reflection, we do believe that further inquiries should have been made before they were deployed.
"Had those inquiries been undertaken then we accept it is very likely that our approach would have been different and the officers would not have been deployed.
"We understand the distress you felt at, and following, the visit from the police officers, and we regret that. We fully accept that we now know that you never committed or threatened any crime

I remember reading about the disgusting treatment this couple had received from our over zealous and completely non-impartial political police and am pleased the Roberts have been vindicated. A point though. How much did it cost to pursue the Roberts? How much were the police legal costs and finally - the £10,000 the Roberts chosen charity will recieve - Who pays for it all? Youve guessed - THE TAXPAYER! Thats you and me.Out of pocket again.

Who will support YOU?

2006-12-23T11:49:00.000Z

Thanks to Sir John Bull (link on left)

Who will support YOU?
It's just so easy for the red fascists. They simply pick off their opponents one by one, safe in the knowledge that everyone else is either too insular or too frightened to object. This 'salami slicing' tactic ensures that their opponents are always weaker and less numerous than they are, and enables the red fascists to win every time.Take the sporting fraternity, for instance. First the red fascists went for the shooters, and everyone else looked away, because they didn't own guns. Then the red fascists went for the stag hunters, and everyone else looked away, because they didn't hunt stags. Then the red fascists went for the fox hunters, and everyone else looked away, because they didn't hunt foxes. Now the red fascists are targeting the fishermen - and who will speak up for them now?Or consider the wider picture. Free speech is being abolished by the red fascists, slice by slice. First they ban race hatred and the incitement of race hatred - and who could possibly object to that? After all, who on earth would actually support the spreading of racial hatred? This was a deliberate ploy to invent a non-existent enemy so that no-one would object to the criminalisation of that enemy. So of course no-one objects to such reasonable legislation which will never affect them - they know it only applies to those 'racist' political extremists (they know they're 'racist' because the red fascists have told them so). But then, from such an innocuous start, the red fascists start to expand the definition of incitement of racial hatred, until any complaint, any objection, or any expression of discontent which could even remotely be inferred to have a racial element is becoming criminalised. The same procedure is then applied to issues of gender, then sexuality, and now religion. Now, suddenly, old soldiers, political leaders, journalists and normal, ordinary men everywhere are being persecuted for speaking their minds and expressing their concerns about modern society. Finally we have the situation where Christian unions are being banned by universities. Who will speak up for them now?Or consider our culture. First the red fascists start to attack shows like the 'black and white minstrels', or children's characters like golliwogs, or advertisements showing beautiful scantily clad bimbos, and each time the public stays silent because each complaint is considered a one-off, too trivial to worry about. And now we have the situation where the wearing of the cross is banned by British Airways. Who will speak up for Christians now?The red fascists are now targeting Christians safe in the knowledge that practising Christians are a minority, and that most people will simply look away. There is also another consideration. The red fascists know that as each group has been targeted, one by one, they have also been demonised in order to prevent them coming together. If only the general public understood that the red fascists will never be satisfied until they have subjugated everyone who does not agree with them. Then maybe people would open their eyes and see that their interests are best served not by cowering under the duvet but by standing shoulder to shoulder and resisting the red fascists.There is only one political party which is prepared to resist the red fascists, rather than roll over and hope to appease them, and that is the British National Party - and that is why the BNP is the prime target of their lies, abuse and attacks. But if you don't support the BNP, when the red fascists come knocking on your door who will support YOU?

The White Dragon of the English

2006-12-23T08:27:00.000Z

The White Dragon is the ancient emblem of the English origins of the Anglo-Saxon migration to Britain which began in the 5th century AD. The most famous of the early migrants were Hengest and Horsa who arrived with their warriors in three ships. In the following years many warriors and settlers crossed the sea and settled lowland Britain from East to West. They came from the Engle (English), the Seax (Saxons) and the Jutes. From the Jutes came the people of Kent and the people of the Isle of Wight and the mainland opposite Wight. From the Saxons came the East Saxons (Essex) and the South Saxons (Sussex) and the West Saxons (Wessex). From Angeln came the East Engle (East Anglia), Middle Engle (English Midlands), Mercians (Mercia), and all the Northumbrians (North of the Humber), which included those now known as the Lowland Scots.

The Engles (English) were the dominant group and by the 9th century the settlers had merged into ONE English identity. The English gave their name to the land they lived in (Englalond) and the language they spoke (Englisc), which has evolved into modern English. It was those scholars writing in Latin who called the English Angels and Anglo-Saxons.These settlers were closely related peoples – so similar in race and culture that they were able to merge into one English identity. Later they absorbed closely related Danish and other Scandinavian settlers.
The English adopted the White Dragon as their battle flag, while their enemy at the time, the Welsh/Britons, flew the Red Dragon. The White Dragon battlestandard was also flown by Harold II (Harold Godwinson), when he destroyed the Norse army of Harald Hardraade and Tostig (Harolds traitorous brother) at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in 1066 and it was the banner under which he and his warriors fought to the death, three weeks later defending their homeland at the Battle Of Hastings on 14th October.
It was also the battlestandard under which King Alfred the Great defeated the great Viking Army at the Battle of Edington and it was the banner carried by the mighty King Athelstan when he smashed the combined armies of the Scots, Welsh, Norse and Irish at the Battle of Brananburgh in 937.

An account of the Battle of Hastings - 14th October 1066
========================================
Harold positioned himself at Senlac Hill near Hastings and selected a spot that was protected on each flank by marshy land. At his rear was a group of trees. He further strengthened his position with a ditch and some fortifications. The English housecarls provided a shield wall at the front of Harold's army. They carried large battle-axes and were considered to be the toughest fighters in Europe.
The fyrd (local lords and the peasantry) were placed behind the housecarls. The leaders of the fyrd, the thegns, had swords and spears but the rest of the men were generally inexperienced fighters and carried weapons such as iron-studded clubs, scythes, slings, reaping-hooks and hay-forks.
We have no accurate figures of the number of soldiers who took part in the battle although historians have estimated that William had about 5,000 infantry and 3,000 knights while Harold had about 2, 500 housecarls and over 6,000 members of the fyrd. At nine in the morning the Norman archers advanced up the hill and when they were about a 100 yards away from Harold's army fired their first volley of arrows. Using their shields, the housecarls were able to block most of this attack. The Norman infantry then charged up the hill.
The English held firm and the Normans were forced to retreat. Members of the fyrd broke ranks and chased after the Normans. William ordered his cavalry to attacked the English who had left their positions on Senlac Hill. English losses were heavy and very few fighters managed to return to their place at the top of the hill.
At about twelve noon there was a break in the fighting for an hour. This gave both sides a chance to remove the dead and wounded from the battlefield. William, who had originally planned to use his cavalry when the English retreated decided to change his tactics. At about one in the afternoon he ordered his archers forward again.
This time they fired higher in the air. The change of direction of the arrows caught the English by surprise. The arrow attack was immediately followed by a cavalry charge. Casualties on both sides were heavy. Those killed included Harold's two brothers, Gyrth and Leofwine. However, the English line again held and the Normans were eventually forced to retreat. The undisciplined fyrd broke ranks to chase the retreating Normans. William of Normandy ordered his knights to turn and attack the men who had left the line. Once again the English suffered many casualties.
William decided to take another rest. He had lost over a quarter of his cavalry. Many horses had been killed and the ones left alive were exhausted. William decided that his knights should dismount and attack as infantry. This time all the Normans went into battle together. The archers fired their arrows and at the same time the knights and infantry charged up the hill.
It was now four in the afternoon. Heavy English casualties from previous attacks meant that the front line was too short and the Normans were able to outflank them, attacking from the sides as well as the front. The few housecarls that were left were forced to form a small shield-circle round the English battlestandard. The Normans attacked again and this time they broke through the shield wall and Harold and most of his housecarls were killed.

The White Dragon in the 21st Century
===========================
Today , as we see a resurgence of patriotic pride sweeping our land, the White Dragon Flag can be seen flying as a symbol of English identity and pride alongside the later Cross of St.George, as the ethno-English fight again to protect our homeland, albeit this time through the ballot box.

Tell Our Government!

2006-12-22T17:21:00.000Z

Do you think Tony Bliar is doing a good job? Does he make you proud to be British? Well now you can tell him how he has exceeded all your expectations (he has certainly exceeded mine). I wouldnt bother him with Iraq, WMDs (they are still looking apparently), unemployment, mass unchecked immigration, the Islamification of Britain or our Third World NHS (or should that be World Class NHS? Depends if you have BUPA i suppose.), or the availablity of any peerages, as he is a busy man these days. However if you have something you want to get off your chest then CLICK ON THE LINK and have your say.

http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/page821.asp

A Mongrel Race?

2006-12-22T16:17:00.000Z

WE ARE A PEOPLE

It has been said that the British are a mongrel race, that has neither the right nor the racial heritage needed to proclaim itself the land of a distinct people and that we have always had mass immigration throughout our history . Nothing could be further from the truth.
Why is it important to establish the argument for a distinct people in the case of Britain and its history? It is important because without knowledge of our cultural and racial origins we are at risk of being demoralised when we are told that our people have no historical, cultural or racial core. It is true that Europe and Britain were settled long ago by Caucasian European tribes. It is true that as with all ancient formations of nations, the settling of lands, warfare and border disputes were indeed the norm. One cannot imagine that, as those Caucasian tribes struggled to settle and claim Britain , anything less than sporadic warfare and land disputes could have taken place. Such are the birth pains of any new nation in the ancient days when the un-tilled lands first felt the feet of the early British tribes. BUT – these tribes were all of common racial stock! So, why are we continually being told we are a "mongrel" nation made up of every hue and colour and creed under the sun? Because as I said a country and people with no sense of history, culture and self are divided and therefore easy pickings for the greedy politicians and their lickspittle sycophants that we have in power in Britain today
It is said that the early British who settled this land were a disparate bunch of peoples who had nothing in common. The conclusions drawn from this argument will be that as Britain was settled by a variety of peoples (having nothing in common) that the peoples surely have no right to claim a natural racial ownership over the land or even to lay claim to the title," The British People".
If you cannot lay claim to the right of being a people then you cannot defend the collective self from the argument that any and all foreign races should be allowed to cross the borders and subsequently to lay claim to the land even to the point of eradicating the culture of the British race. After all if a people are not recognised as a people, but only as a rag tag group of individuals with no common collective core, no rights to being known as a people then how can they insist that they have a unique culture to preserve and to protect?
So we see the insidious nature of the argument which states that Britain is predominantly populated not by a people (the descendants of our forefathers who settled the land in ancient days), but by a myriad of races, having no common, ancient racial origin, which simply happened to have formed, in that which is now known as Britain.

COMMON BLOODLINES

Actually the forefathers of the British race had everything in common as far as a common racial origin. Now some may argue against these conclusions, however those who would argue would most likely be the same individuals who would argue that the Swedes, the Norwegians and the Danes are very different in racial origin. This argument would be wrong and it would be to ignore the fact that these current nations were simply different parts of the same, huge Viking entity which once roamed the area as a whole tribe, but then split into nations over border warfare and disputes. It will amaze you when you realise just how much of a common racial bloodline the people who formed the British 'race' actually had. Let us look at the racial pattern we have set down for ourselves in history and you will see that we were once great Caucasian tribes.
Britain was formed by the Caucasian race.It only takes a knowledge of history, (an untwisted account of history, one that is not tainted or twisted in word in order to present a false impression with which to demoralise a people), in order to quickly see that the facts of history lay out a very clear road map as to the common racial roots of those who formed Britain.

Early settlers

So, who were the people who settled and created that which is now known as Britain and what did they have in common? What brought them together as a people? First off, the Celts were a tribe from the North of Europe. They were a northern tribe of Caucasians.
Now let us look at the Normans. They were Vikings by race which means that they originated from a Northern European area thus they were a Northern tribe of Caucasians in origin. It is true that they mixed with the French in bloodline, but to argue that the French are not a distinct people just because the Vikings are a part of the French is as absurd as it is to argue that the British race does not exist just because we have had an influxes of settlers over the last two millenia. Let us look at the Danes. They were Vikings by race and thus a Northern European tribe. Let us look at the Picts. They were they were a Viking race (yes that does mean that they were at one time a Northern European tribe in origin) which intermarried with and were absorbed by the Scots who were speakers of the Irish (Gaelic) language.
Let us look at the Saxons, the Jutes, the Angles, all people of northern or Germanic origin. Are you seeing the pattern? The Celtic peoples such as the Gaels, the Britons and the Belgae were much noted for being tall, blonde or red haired and blue eyed or light of eye. They were known for their tattooing. Picts or 'painted men' were known for their ferociousness in battle!

Of course some British forefathers were shorter and some were taller and some were fair while some were pale and some a snowy white. Some had brunette hair and some white blonde or golden hues. We speak in general terms of the physical descriptions of the Viking races. Remember that Denmark and Sweden and Norway are all simply Viking tribes which broke apart as warfare and disputes broke out amongst them. They do not look identical and neither do you or i.
Now, what pattern do we see in the forefathers of the British? We see that the people who settled Britain had a great deal in common when it comes to racial bloodlines
Yes the Romans were in Britain just as they were once in France . It was in 55 and 54 BC, after Rome had conquered Gaul or as we call it now France that Gaius Julius Caesar decided that he needed to deploy troops to Britain to crush the British resistance. Is France not French because Rome was there? Is Britain not British because Rome was there? Of course this argument is ludicrous.Caesar was driven back from Britain when he met with fierce resistance from the free British peoples.
After coming up against the fierce inhabitants of Britain a disgruntled Caesar decided it was best to return his troops to Gaul. Between 54BC and AD 43 trade links developed between Britain and Rome , but then Rome just had to try again and in AD 43 the Roman Emperor Claudius invaded Britain. He was met with a ferocious resistance by the indigenous British and could only conquer lowland England.The British were such a fierce people, such a proud people that even the might and glory of ancient Rome knew itself to be in serious peril when up against the British people. In AD 60 the Roman Suetonius Paulinus was campaigning in North Wales against the Druids, when a major anti Roman uprising was started by Boudicca who openly rebelled when her daughters were raped by roman occupiers.
The major Roman settlements were destroyed in Britain before the uprising was defeated. Rome was now more certain than ever that Britons could be a terribly proud and fierce people when stirred, and if truth be told Rome never could conquer all of Britain. Highland scotland was never conquered by Rome and the areas of Britain which were conquered never would stay conquered. The British never did accept defeat. They simply would not stay down.In AD 409 the Imperial occupation of Britain came to an end.
Let us look at what the British took for themselves culturally from the days of the Roman occupation and we shall see how ancient Greece became an important part of the British people's culture. Whilst Roman empirical forces occupied warlike Britain , or shall we say "attempted" to occupy it? Remember that even the forces of the Roman Empire could never occupy or hold of all Britain . Many of the British incorporated much of the philosophical and educational ideology of Rome into their own lives.
Now let us remember that much of Roman civilisation, culture, literature and art came almost entirely from ancient Greece. For example, no Roman of good family could have called himself truly cultured unless he was able to speak fluently in the Greek language and had a good knowledge of all Greek literature.
The Celts likewise had made a strong impact in the collective Roman mind.
We have already established the racial bloodline from where the British originated and all of this talk about the Romans and the Greeks is in regards to CULTURAL influences on the ancient British, not racial. It is also important to remember that the British ALREADY had their own arts and ideologies in place.They simply added, via ancient Rome, some of the best that ancient Greece had to offer by way of literature and philosophy, to their own vast Northern European, Celtic and Germanic based storehouse of knowledge.
The Church became a major influence in Rome which became predominantly Christian by the year AD 200, and this added to the influence of the church as a major force in Britain.
It was not until Elizabeth the First promoted and created the Church of England that the hold of Rome was lessened in matters of the Church in a permanent way in Britain. So we see that the racial heritage of Britain was culturally influenced by the old ways, by the philosophy and art of ancient Greece, by way of the Roman occupation which ended in Rome leaving Britain, but most of all by the legends and lore and culture of the ancient Northern European Caucasians from where the blood of the ancient British sprang.

So yes – we have had waves of immigration over the centuries but in relatively small numbers, most who were assimilated into our culture and ALL were from the same racial stock
What we have had since 1948 with the arrival of the SS Windrush is an open door policy allowing people of any colour and culture to settle irrespective of numbers or culture or beliefs – nobody knows how many immigrants, illegal or otherwise are currently in our land. However the effects of this can be seen daily on our streets and in our schools and in our communities with race ghettos springing up and spates of anti-white attacks on our people –on our sons, and on our daughters, on our neighbours and on our friends. Taxes have increased to tyrannical levels and our freedom of speech is under direct threat from a government too cowardly to attack the problems but quite happy to betray their own people for the price of a vote.
But we are the descendants of these proud and ancient British people, they never rolled over – why should we?

Christmas is CHRISTmas!

2006-12-21T18:56:00.001Z

I dont want to labour the point as we see and hear about it all the time but when offered "seasons greetings" or some other PC drivel tell people its CHRISTmas! If you are not a christian then you dont have to play! BUT dont expect us to hide our celebrations under some meaningless greeting designed to be "socially inclusive" (whatever the hell that is!). So speak out and speak up - your voice will make a difference!
Happy Christmas to you all!

Welcome to the BLOG

2006-12-21T18:41:00.000Z

Welcome all - This is a new blog with which i hope to lay down some of my thoughts on the state of the nation that is Great Britain in the early 21st century.
I am a member of Britains finest and most decent political party - the British National Party.
I am a white middle class taxpayer and as such despised and ignored by the establishment lackeys whose wages i pay.