In an earlier post i wrote about a case in Buckinghamshire where a muslim pupil was taking legal action (or rather the people behind her were - she is only 12) to allow the wearing of the niqab - the full-face or "letterbox" veil. It appeared that as is the norm it was going to cost us (the taxpayer) a shedload of our hard earned money whichever way the case went. However, in what appears as a glint of common sense from the courts, her case has been lost and she cannot wear the veil in school! For legal reasons, both the girl and the school cannot be identified and it is believed the girl has been taught at home (at a cost to the taxpayer no doubt!) after falling foul of the ban last year. About 120 of the school's 1300 pupils are Muslims. About half of them wear the hijab headscarf, which is allowed. In his judgement, Mr Justice Silber said the ban was "proportionate". Firstly because the veil prevented teachers from seeing the faces and expressions of the pupils. Secondly, the necessity of enforcing a reasonable school uniform policy to ensure equality (hmm - theres THAT word again) amongst the pupils; thirdly to prevent peer pressure on girls to take up wearing the full veil/letterbox and, finally, to avoid unwanted visitors using the veil as a disguise in order to breach the school's security.The school's head teacher welcomed the court's decision and costs in the case were awarded against the girl's family. Well thats good news - the banning of this bat headgear is to be welcomed always as it is not a religious requirement for muslims, only an outwardly visible sign of separation and non-integration into the host community here in the UK. And they have had the costs awarded against them! This is great news for the taxpayer and maybe, just maybe, might make these people think again before pushing at the boundaries of hospitality and law in this isle of ours. When will these people realise that our country and constitution (the Bill of Rights, such as it is) is not a "living" document that is open to change by whatever bunch of chancers fancy their arm to do so. If you want to live here then abide by OUR laws, OUR culture, OUR rules - if you dont like it then leave and go and live in an islamic state elsewhere! OUR COUNTRY IS NOT FOR YOU TO DO AS YOU WANT!
William Shakespeare (1564-1616)
"This blessed plot, this earth, this realm. This England, this nurse, this teaming womb of royal kings".
(John of Gaunts speech in Richard II)
Saturday, 3 March 2007
Poles Apart
The Polish health service are refusing to treat Britons who fall ill while in their country! Instead the unfortunate potential patients are being sent back to the UK for treatment. The poles first claimed it was on the grounds of spreading infection. So, let me get this right, you have an infectious illness but instead of a course of treatment "on site" so to speak, you have to travel home and during the trip you will not infect anyone else? I did check that this was Poland and NOT Ireland - and indeed it is. After being soundly bashed by blisteringly belligerent Britons complaining to their embassies the Poles then came up with another "reason" for the non treatment of foreign nationals. Namely that their health service was overloaded and could not cope! Im sorry but for a moment there i thought they said they could not cope? After nearly choking on my Cocoa (good job i wasnt in poland, eh?) i thought about the implications. Now we have god only knows how many Poles here in the UK (three-quarters of a million seems to be the standard uneducated guess) ALL with access to our third world health service for free. Our local hospital, the Pilgrim (oh the irony) at Boston is full of poles and other foreign nationals. It is particularly full in A & E at the weekends when they seek treatment after sharing their "culture" with each other - a culture seeming to consist of getting as pissed as possible on cheap vodka and bashing each other about, or crashing their uninsured cars while semi-comatose (im not joking here - i have seen it with my own eyes, the worst being three separate car crashes on my local high street on a friday night with the drivers too drunk even to get out of the cars). We should take a leaf out of the poles book and refuse to treat these drunken, self injuring sons-of-bitches and send THEM back to poland for treatment. Every nurse, doctor or staff member at our hospitals could then get on treating the British people who have contributed something to the service instead of patching up unwanted cheap foreign labour who ignore many of our laws and cause untold damage to our health service by clogging the system through their own stupidity.
Britain is being severely damaged by cheap foreign labour - we are paying £77 million in benefits to them each year as well a providing translators, school places etc - and that is without the impact of job losses among the local British workforce. The BNP will exit the EU as fast a you can say " a chep buttle ov wodka ant an ambu-lence pleez" and stop the farcial shennanigans of many of these so called "guest workers" - who are certainly not guests nor, judging by the amount of benefits they are scrounging, workers either! VOTE BNP! OUT OF EUROPE!
William Wordsworth - Poet
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."
Britain is being severely damaged by cheap foreign labour - we are paying £77 million in benefits to them each year as well a providing translators, school places etc - and that is without the impact of job losses among the local British workforce. The BNP will exit the EU as fast a you can say " a chep buttle ov wodka ant an ambu-lence pleez" and stop the farcial shennanigans of many of these so called "guest workers" - who are certainly not guests nor, judging by the amount of benefits they are scrounging, workers either! VOTE BNP! OUT OF EUROPE!
William Wordsworth - Poet
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."
Friday, 23 February 2007
Terror Alert Level Upgrade
Security services (MI5) have today announced an immediate security upgrade in mainland UK effective as of 13.00 hours. The Labour Government have reacted to the security alert by raising their Public Security Level from "Scoundrels" to "You Dirty Rotters". Amidst a flurry of extremist activity it is expected that levels will be raised again to "Bloody Disgusting" or even "Absolutely Furious". (As a side note, Londoners have not been "Absolutely Furious" since the Blitz in 1940, when tea supplies almost ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorised from "Simply Not Cricket" to "Damned Unsporting". The last time an alert of this magnitude was issued was during the Norman invasion in 1066AD).
As a direct result of our own increased security level, the following countries have increased theirs accordingly:
The French Government has announced that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Run and Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was initially precipitated by a recent terrorist attack that destroyed the French white flag factory, effectively paralysing the countries military capabilities.
Italy has increased its alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing". Two further levels remain to the Italian government. They are: Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides", a level which was last issued in World War Two.
Ireland initially raised its threat level to "Offer Them Refuelling Facilities for U-Boats" , a level withdrawn when a passing schoolboy pointed out that the terrorists did not have any yet. The level remains at "Have The Crack".
Germanys security level has increased from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Sing Marching Songs" with again a further two options of "Invade Your Neighbours" and "Lose".
The USA, not wanting to be sidelined, has gone from "Wait and See Whos Winning" to "What is Friendly Fire?"
Finally, all of Belguim has gone on holiday as the only threat they face is NATO pulling out of Brussels.
As a direct result of our own increased security level, the following countries have increased theirs accordingly:
The French Government has announced that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Run and Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was initially precipitated by a recent terrorist attack that destroyed the French white flag factory, effectively paralysing the countries military capabilities.
Italy has increased its alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing". Two further levels remain to the Italian government. They are: Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides", a level which was last issued in World War Two.
Ireland initially raised its threat level to "Offer Them Refuelling Facilities for U-Boats" , a level withdrawn when a passing schoolboy pointed out that the terrorists did not have any yet. The level remains at "Have The Crack".
Germanys security level has increased from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Sing Marching Songs" with again a further two options of "Invade Your Neighbours" and "Lose".
The USA, not wanting to be sidelined, has gone from "Wait and See Whos Winning" to "What is Friendly Fire?"
Finally, all of Belguim has gone on holiday as the only threat they face is NATO pulling out of Brussels.
Agincourt - A Very English Victory
Date: 25th October 1415
Agincourt in northern France
Henry V was an outstanding soldier, strategically and tactically aware he was ruthless to religious and political opponents.Born in 1387 he spent most of his life in warfare and died while campaigning in 1422.
After taking the town of Harfleur Henry moved across France. On the 24th October he found his way blocked by a French force of 25,000 heavily armed troops.
They prepared for the battle which would surely see the English wiped out the next day.
By this time Henry had only 6,000 men, comprising of 5,000 archers and 1,000 men-at-arms. However the archers were armed with a weapon that was to command battlefields for years to come, the English Longbow.
Probably Welsh in origin, and adapted, the longbow required immense strength to fire, but it had a huge range and an experienced man could fire twelve arrows in a minute, the crossbow could manage only two. The English had perfected the art by making it law for the populace to practice on Sundays. Even today many villages and towns still have a village green which was originally used for this purpose.The huge French army, which was led by Charles D'Albret, sat and waited for the English to make a move so that it could go in for the kill.
Henry decided to advance to within 200 yards of the French with the cry 'Advance banners!'From there they sent a volley of arrows which struck ferociously into the first French ranks.There had been heavy rain and the ground, which was ploughed, was soft and muddy. In addition the field was narrow and thick woods protected Henrys flanks. This forced the massive French force to bunch together as they advanced, effectively channelling them towards the English frontline. As they came forward the English archers fired their first volleys. Within five minutes the entire first wave of French were reduced to a helpless bloody mess struggling in their heavy armour. Their arrows soon gone, the lightly armoured English archers darted about the struggling French masses, retrieving arrows and dispatching struggling men-at-arms with daggers. Still the French came on, pushed forward by pride and arrogance. Time and time again the waves of attack were stopped, the English archers now protected by a wall of French dead. Finally the French reserves led by the Duke of Brabant made a final attempt to break the English line, but he had effectively joined a lost battle and was just in time to be killed. The French retreated.
The French losses were put at 10,000 including its commander Charles D'Albret. Only a handful of English were lost (some sources estimate as low as 23 men). Henry and his men had shown tremendous courage in the face of overwhelming odds and had been assisted by favourable ground conditions. It was a great English victory and one well worth remembering!
Lord Admiral Horatio Nelson
"First, you must implicitly obey orders… Secondly, you must consider every man as your enemy who speaks ill of your King... And thirdly, you must hate a Frenchman as you do the devil".
(Giving advice to a new recruit on how to survive in the Royal Navy)
Agincourt in northern France
Henry V was an outstanding soldier, strategically and tactically aware he was ruthless to religious and political opponents.Born in 1387 he spent most of his life in warfare and died while campaigning in 1422.
After taking the town of Harfleur Henry moved across France. On the 24th October he found his way blocked by a French force of 25,000 heavily armed troops.
They prepared for the battle which would surely see the English wiped out the next day.
By this time Henry had only 6,000 men, comprising of 5,000 archers and 1,000 men-at-arms. However the archers were armed with a weapon that was to command battlefields for years to come, the English Longbow.
Probably Welsh in origin, and adapted, the longbow required immense strength to fire, but it had a huge range and an experienced man could fire twelve arrows in a minute, the crossbow could manage only two. The English had perfected the art by making it law for the populace to practice on Sundays. Even today many villages and towns still have a village green which was originally used for this purpose.The huge French army, which was led by Charles D'Albret, sat and waited for the English to make a move so that it could go in for the kill.
Henry decided to advance to within 200 yards of the French with the cry 'Advance banners!'From there they sent a volley of arrows which struck ferociously into the first French ranks.There had been heavy rain and the ground, which was ploughed, was soft and muddy. In addition the field was narrow and thick woods protected Henrys flanks. This forced the massive French force to bunch together as they advanced, effectively channelling them towards the English frontline. As they came forward the English archers fired their first volleys. Within five minutes the entire first wave of French were reduced to a helpless bloody mess struggling in their heavy armour. Their arrows soon gone, the lightly armoured English archers darted about the struggling French masses, retrieving arrows and dispatching struggling men-at-arms with daggers. Still the French came on, pushed forward by pride and arrogance. Time and time again the waves of attack were stopped, the English archers now protected by a wall of French dead. Finally the French reserves led by the Duke of Brabant made a final attempt to break the English line, but he had effectively joined a lost battle and was just in time to be killed. The French retreated.
The French losses were put at 10,000 including its commander Charles D'Albret. Only a handful of English were lost (some sources estimate as low as 23 men). Henry and his men had shown tremendous courage in the face of overwhelming odds and had been assisted by favourable ground conditions. It was a great English victory and one well worth remembering!
Lord Admiral Horatio Nelson
"First, you must implicitly obey orders… Secondly, you must consider every man as your enemy who speaks ill of your King... And thirdly, you must hate a Frenchman as you do the devil".
(Giving advice to a new recruit on how to survive in the Royal Navy)
What About Our Own People?
This is the stuff of nightmares. I know Spalding very well and am aware of the housing problems faced by many local people:
Lincolnshire Housing plan for Migrant Workers
It is reported in the local paper, the Spalding Guardian (www.spaldingtoday.co.uk) of 15th February, that local migrant labour peddler "Ray Turner Labour Ltd" has submitted plans to house up to 300 migrant workers on a new development near Spalding in Lincolnshire. Currently Spalding is overwhelmed with migrant labour due to the pressures on the food industry from the major supermarkets. This is being fed by the greed of local businesses wishing to cash in on the exploitation of foreign migrant labour. Spalding is becoming so "enriched" that it is difficult to hear English being spoken in the town, and when out shopping. A council employee recently commented how nice it was to deal with an English person for a change!
The papers own poll currently shows 77% of people against the development, but unsurprisingly, residents fear that the council and local opinion will be overridden by the ODPM (office of the deputy prime minister) and permission will be granted. This will bring the strain on local health and education services to a crisis point, as often the migrant workers in this area do not send their money home, but bring their relatives to the town, as in the case of Milda Staffieri, who brags that the development "would be a big boost for migrant workers". With hot-bedding already a big problem in the area, this could be a major source of tension as Spalding already has one of the highest unemployment rates in the area, mainly due to unethically imported (and unwanted) foreign labour.
I was in my local pub last night and a local couple were telling me that they had been on the housing list for seven years and now, due to an influx of foreign workers and their dependants, have been told that have been downgraded yet again! They had no idea of when or even if they could expect to be suitably housed. This situation is fast becoming intolerable for many local people. The locals will oppose any planning permissions sought by greedy local businesses to house their exploited workers. However, this alone will not help those Britons who do not have access to low-cost housingt. We need a change of policy and this starts at grassroots level by changing from the old parties to one that will put the indigenous people first! That party is the BNP!
Lincolnshire Housing plan for Migrant Workers
It is reported in the local paper, the Spalding Guardian (www.spaldingtoday.co.uk) of 15th February, that local migrant labour peddler "Ray Turner Labour Ltd" has submitted plans to house up to 300 migrant workers on a new development near Spalding in Lincolnshire. Currently Spalding is overwhelmed with migrant labour due to the pressures on the food industry from the major supermarkets. This is being fed by the greed of local businesses wishing to cash in on the exploitation of foreign migrant labour. Spalding is becoming so "enriched" that it is difficult to hear English being spoken in the town, and when out shopping. A council employee recently commented how nice it was to deal with an English person for a change!
The papers own poll currently shows 77% of people against the development, but unsurprisingly, residents fear that the council and local opinion will be overridden by the ODPM (office of the deputy prime minister) and permission will be granted. This will bring the strain on local health and education services to a crisis point, as often the migrant workers in this area do not send their money home, but bring their relatives to the town, as in the case of Milda Staffieri, who brags that the development "would be a big boost for migrant workers". With hot-bedding already a big problem in the area, this could be a major source of tension as Spalding already has one of the highest unemployment rates in the area, mainly due to unethically imported (and unwanted) foreign labour.
I was in my local pub last night and a local couple were telling me that they had been on the housing list for seven years and now, due to an influx of foreign workers and their dependants, have been told that have been downgraded yet again! They had no idea of when or even if they could expect to be suitably housed. This situation is fast becoming intolerable for many local people. The locals will oppose any planning permissions sought by greedy local businesses to house their exploited workers. However, this alone will not help those Britons who do not have access to low-cost housingt. We need a change of policy and this starts at grassroots level by changing from the old parties to one that will put the indigenous people first! That party is the BNP!
Friday, 16 February 2007
Black on Black Killings - Peckham
I watched the news the other night, flicking between the BBC and ITV propaganda. The reporters were all in a frenzy trying to out dramatise each other while reporting on the latest shootings in "sarf landan" - this time in Peckham. What caught my attention? The BBC reporter said that the permanent police operation Trident were meeting in the morning to investigate this latest episode and explained that Trident was set up to combat crime "affecting the black community". Nothing sinister in that description, i hear you mutter. However the ITV reporter a few minutes later said that Trident was a ongoing police operation investigating Black on Black gun crime! Now theres a world of difference between the two descriptions used and the BBC report makes no mention of race - no surprise there! So i dug around a little and found that Trident is indeed an ongoing police operation with over 300 police officers and 70 support staff that are dedicated to Trident, supported and informed by Trident's "Independent Advisory Group" whoever they are. Thats about 1.5% of the London Police Force (sorry, "service") on full time duties trying to stop black on black gun crime in the capital. Assuming the average mean pay of the officers is circa £30k that is a cost of £12,000,000 per annum for what is a minority of criminals within the black community! Del Boy would be turning in his car coat.......
Stephen Leacock (1869-1944)
"American politicians do anything for money... English politicians take the money and won't do anything ".
Stephen Leacock (1869-1944)
"American politicians do anything for money... English politicians take the money and won't do anything ".
Horse, Stable, Bolted....................
According to the papers plans for a new 700-bed jail beside South-east London's maximum security Belmarsh prison have been announced by unfit-for-purpose Home Secretary John Reid.
He also revealed that planning permission had been secured for a new 600-place prison near Ashworth high security mental hospital in Merseyside.
The two projects together are likely to cost more than £160m to build, although the Home Office refused to disclose official costings ahead of a bidding process for construction contracts (which probably means that as usual they havent got a clue).
A site has been purchased by the Home Office next to Belmarsh - one of the most secure prisons in the country which features a special "jail within a jail" housing many Muslim terrorists. The planned new prison is expected to be a lower risk Category C jail.
The Home Secretary said: "We are working flat out (Government speak for doing bugger-all) to deliver additional capacity within the prison system. In July last year I announced plans for an extra 8,000 places to be delivered by 2012. That process starts now. We already own two potential sites for new prisons and I can announce today that one of them is at Maghull, where we already have planning permission to provide up to 600 new places by 2010. A second is next door to Belmarsh prison in south-east London, where we are still in discussion with the planning authorities.
In total, our building programme now amounts to about 8,000 new places over the next five years. In 2007 alone, I am planning to deliver about 2,500 new places, including about 1,500 by July, with new places at 13 different prisons."
Apparently Reid will say during a visit to Maghull that another 30 sites are being considered for new jails across the country.
Now i might be missing the maths here but as i understand that we are currently short of around 11,000 prison places as of February 2007. Therefore even if no additional felons in the country are sent to prison between now and 2012, apart from on a one-out one-in basis we will still be short some 3000 prison places! Funnily enough the figure of 11,000 is precisely the same amount as the number of foreign criminals in our jails.........so to me the solution is to deport ALL 11,000 of the foreign criminal scum currently languishing in Her Majestys prisons and fill the places up with our own home-grown scum. As usual Nu-Labour have no real solution and are, as always, too little too late in their approach to any contact with the real world. The words horse, stable and bolted spring to mind.
Samuel Johnson
"He that wishes to see his country robbed of its rights can not be a patriot".
He also revealed that planning permission had been secured for a new 600-place prison near Ashworth high security mental hospital in Merseyside.
The two projects together are likely to cost more than £160m to build, although the Home Office refused to disclose official costings ahead of a bidding process for construction contracts (which probably means that as usual they havent got a clue).
A site has been purchased by the Home Office next to Belmarsh - one of the most secure prisons in the country which features a special "jail within a jail" housing many Muslim terrorists. The planned new prison is expected to be a lower risk Category C jail.
The Home Secretary said: "We are working flat out (Government speak for doing bugger-all) to deliver additional capacity within the prison system. In July last year I announced plans for an extra 8,000 places to be delivered by 2012. That process starts now. We already own two potential sites for new prisons and I can announce today that one of them is at Maghull, where we already have planning permission to provide up to 600 new places by 2010. A second is next door to Belmarsh prison in south-east London, where we are still in discussion with the planning authorities.
In total, our building programme now amounts to about 8,000 new places over the next five years. In 2007 alone, I am planning to deliver about 2,500 new places, including about 1,500 by July, with new places at 13 different prisons."
Apparently Reid will say during a visit to Maghull that another 30 sites are being considered for new jails across the country.
Now i might be missing the maths here but as i understand that we are currently short of around 11,000 prison places as of February 2007. Therefore even if no additional felons in the country are sent to prison between now and 2012, apart from on a one-out one-in basis we will still be short some 3000 prison places! Funnily enough the figure of 11,000 is precisely the same amount as the number of foreign criminals in our jails.........so to me the solution is to deport ALL 11,000 of the foreign criminal scum currently languishing in Her Majestys prisons and fill the places up with our own home-grown scum. As usual Nu-Labour have no real solution and are, as always, too little too late in their approach to any contact with the real world. The words horse, stable and bolted spring to mind.
Samuel Johnson
"He that wishes to see his country robbed of its rights can not be a patriot".
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
