It's a shame Great Britain ( or are we now Region 8 since the traitor Brown signed away another chunk of our right to self rule?) doesn't have a Prime minister like this, we might not get dragged into so many problems. If anybody has Gordon Browns email, please feel free to pass it on. I know the speech is a bit out of date, but is inspirational none the less. Gordon Brown or John Howard.......Gordon Brown or John Howard..........
The Free British People needs a leader like this!!
Prime Minister John Howard - Australia
Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on to get out of Australia , as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.
A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia and her Queen at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his Ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown. Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state, and its laws were made by parliament. 'If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you', he said on National Television ....
'I'd be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia : one the Australian law and another Islamic law that is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that's a better option', Costello said.
Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country. Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should clear off. 'Basically people who don't want to be Australians, and who don't want to live by Australian values and understand them, well then, they can basically clear off', he said.
Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques. Quote: 'IMMIGRANTS, NOT AUSTRALIANS, MUST ADAPT. Take It Or Leave It. I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture. Since the terrorist attacks on Bali , we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Australians.'
'However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the 'politically correct' crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others. I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to Australia . However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand. This idea of Australia being a multi-cultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. And as Australians, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle.
This culture has been developed over two centuries of struggles, trials and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
We speak mainly ENGLISH, not Spanish, Lebanese, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society . Learn the language!
Most Australians believe in God. This is not some Christian, right wing, political push, but a fact, because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.
We will accept your beliefs, and will not question why. All we ask is that you accept ours, and live in harmony and peaceful enjoyment with us.
If the Southern Cross offends you, or you don't like 'A Fair Go', then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. By all means, keep your culture, but do not force it on others.
This is OUR COUNTRY, OUR LAND, and OUR LIFESTYLE, and we will allow you every opportunity to enjoy all this. But once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about Our Flag, Our Pledge, Our Christian beliefs, or Our Way of Life, I highly encourage you take advantage of one other great Australian freedom,'THE RIGHT TO LEAVE'.
If you aren't happy here then LEAVE. We didn't force you to come here. You asked to be here. So accept the country YOU chose.'
Maybe if we had a leader with a backbone to start speaking and voicing the same truths we would not be in the situation we are currently in, being whinged at at the drop of a burka by some snivelling moslem, being bombed by people who have been educated, sheltered and welcomed by our politicians (but not the MAN on the street) and generally having a rare old time at our expense (and i do mean expense).
Friday, 14 December 2007
Thursday, 13 December 2007
Treason!
Gordon Brown and his band of marxists have today put another nail in the coffin of Great Britain. Without having the guts to go and put his own "X" on the "revised" EU Treaty, he sent one of his running dogs to put his paw print on instead. This man promised the Free British People a referendum on this constitution and he has reneged on this solemn oath. Brown is a man of no integrity, a traitor to his own people and how he has the audacity to continue to masquerade as a man for the people is beyond me. We have an opportunity in next years London elections to give this treasonous party a bloody nose. Vote for the BNP and start to reclaim your heritage. Not until we have a Nationalist government will we have the will to withdraw from the EU superstate, control our own borders and give priority to our own people.
Brown - You should hang your head in shame for this foul deed.
Brown - You should hang your head in shame for this foul deed.
Monday, 10 December 2007
Are We A Mongrel race - HELL NO!
I make no apologies for "re blogging" this article from last years blog. It should strike chords in all of us. Never forget our proud heritage - its what we leave for our children and our childrens childern. It is said we are a difficult people. To me this shows the true meaning of diversity - not the dressed up multicultural claptrap we are assailed with on a daily basis, but the REAL diversity of a people who are aware of their heritage, their culture and their roots.People who can still function as thinking individuals, and not the product of some marxist school of non-thought. Particularly at this time.
It has been said that the British are a mongrel race, that has neither the right nor the racial heritage needed to proclaim itself the land of a distinct people and that we have always had mass immigration throughout our history .
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Why is it important to establish the argument for a distinct people in the case of Britain and its history? It is important because without knowledge of our cultural and racial origins we are at risk of being demoralised when we are told that our people have no historical, cultural or racial core. It is true that Europe and Britain were settled long ago by Caucasian European tribes. It is true that as with all ancient formations of nations, the settling of lands, warfare and border disputes were indeed the norm. One cannot imagine that, as those Caucasian tribes struggled to settle and claim Britain , anything less than sporadic warfare and land disputes could have taken place. Such are the birth pains of any new nation in the ancient days when the un-tilled lands first felt the feet of the early British tribes. BUT – these tribes were all of common racial stock! So, why are we continually being told we are a "mongrel" nation made up of every hue and colour and creed under the sun? Because as I said a country and people with no sense of history, culture and self are divided and therefore easy pickings for the greedy politicians and their lickspittle sycophants that we have in power in Britain todayIt is said that the early British who settled this land were a disparate bunch of peoples who had nothing in common. The conclusions drawn from this argument will be that as Britain was settled by a variety of peoples (having nothing in common) that the peoples surely have no right to claim a natural racial ownership over the land or even to lay claim to the title," The British People".If you cannot lay claim to the right of being a people then you cannot defend the collective self from the argument that any and all foreign races should be allowed to cross the borders and subsequently to lay claim to the land even to the point of eradicating the culture of the British race. After all if a people are not recognised as a people, but only as a rag tag group of individuals with no common collective core, no rights to being known as a people then how can they insist that they have a unique culture to preserve and to protect? So we see the insidious nature of the argument which states that Britain is predominantly populated not by a people (the descendants of our forefathers who settled the land in ancient days), but by a myriad of races, having no common, ancient racial origin, which simply happened to have formed, in that which is now known as Britain.
COMMON BLOODLINES.
Actually the forefathers of the British race had everything in common as far as a common racial origin. Now some may argue against these conclusions, however those who would argue would most likely be the same individuals who would argue that the Swedes, the Norwegians and the Danes are very different in racial origin. This argument would be wrong and it would be to ignore the fact that these current nations were simply different parts of the same, huge Viking entity which once roamed the area as a whole tribe, but then split into nations over border warfare and disputes. It will amaze you when you realise just how much of a common racial bloodline the people who formed the British 'race' actually had. Let us look at the racial pattern we have set down for ourselves in history and you will see that we were once great Caucasian tribes. Britain was formed by the Caucasian race.It only takes a knowledge of history, (an untwisted account of history, one that is not tainted or twisted in word in order to present a false impression with which to demoralise a people), in order to quickly see that the facts of history lay out a very clear road map as to the common racial roots of those who formed Britain.Early settlersSo, who were the people who settled and created that which is now known as Britain and what did they have in common? What brought them together as a people? First off, the Celts were a tribe from the North of Europe. They were a northern tribe of Caucasians.Now let us look at the Normans. They were Vikings by race which means that they originated from a Northern European area thus they were a Northern tribe of Caucasians in origin. It is true that they mixed with the French in bloodline, but to argue that the French are not a distinct people just because the Vikings are a part of the French is as absurd as it is to argue that the British race does not exist just because we have had an influxes of settlers over the last two millenia. Let us look at the Danes. They were Vikings by race and thus a Northern European tribe. Let us look at the Picts. They were they were a Viking race (yes that does mean that they were at one time a Northern European tribe in origin) which intermarried with and were absorbed by the Scots who were speakers of the Irish (Gaelic) language.Let us look at the Saxons, the Jutes, the Angles, all people of northern or Germanic origin. Are you seeing the pattern? The Celtic peoples such as the Gaels, the Britons and the Belgae were much noted for being tall, blonde or red haired and blue eyed or light of eye. They were known for their tattooing. Picts or 'painted men' were known for their ferociousness in battle!Of course some British forefathers were shorter and some were taller and some were fair while some were pale and some a snowy white. Some had brunette hair and some white blonde or golden hues. We speak in general terms of the physical descriptions of the Viking races. Remember that Denmark and Sweden and Norway are all simply Viking tribes which broke apart as warfare and disputes broke out amongst them. They do not look identical and neither do you or i.Now, what pattern do we see in the forefathers of the British? We see that the people who settled Britain had a great deal in common when it comes to racial bloodlinesYes the Romans were in Britain just as they were once in France . It was in 55 and 54 BC, after Rome had conquered Gaul or as we call it now France that Gaius Julius Caesar decided that he needed to deploy troops to Britain to crush the British resistance. Is France not French because Rome was there? Is Britain not British because Rome was there? Of course this argument is ludicrous.Caesar was driven back from Britain when he met with fierce resistance from the free British peoples.After coming up against the fierce inhabitants of Britain a disgruntled Caesar decided it was best to return his troops to Gaul. Between 54BC and AD 43 trade links developed between Britain and Rome , but then Rome just had to try again and in AD 43 the Roman Emperor Claudius invaded Britain. He was met with a ferocious resistance by the indigenous British and could only conquer lowland England.The British were such a fierce people, such a proud people that even the might and glory of ancient Rome knew itself to be in serious peril when up against the British people. In AD 60 the Roman Suetonius Paulinus was campaigning in North Wales against the Druids, when a major anti Roman uprising was started by Boudicca who openly rebelled when her daughters were raped by roman occupiers.The major Roman settlements were destroyed in Britain before the uprising was defeated. Rome was now more certain than ever that Britons could be a terribly proud and fierce people when stirred, and if truth be told Rome never could conquer all of Britain. Highland scotland was never conquered by Rome and the areas of Britain which were conquered never would stay conquered. The British never did accept defeat. They simply would not stay down. In AD 409 the Imperial occupation of Britain came to an end.
Let us look at what the British took for themselves culturally from the days of the Roman occupation and we shall see how ancient Greece became an important part of the British people's culture. Whilst Roman empirical forces occupied warlike Britain , or shall we say "attempted" to occupy it? Remember that even the forces of the Roman Empire could never occupy or hold of all Britain . Many of the British incorporated much of the philosophical and educational ideology of Rome into their own lives.Now let us remember that much of Roman civilisation, culture, literature and art came almost entirely from ancient Greece. For example, no Roman of good family could have called himself truly cultured unless he was able to speak fluently in the Greek language and had a good knowledge of all Greek literature.The Celts likewise had made a strong impact in the collective Roman mind.We have already established the racial bloodline from where the British originated and all of this talk about the Romans and the Greeks is in regards to CULTURAL influences on the ancient British, not racial. It is also important to remember that the British ALREADY had their own arts and ideologies in place.They simply added, via ancient Rome, some of the best that ancient Greece had to offer by way of literature and philosophy, to their own vast Northern European, Celtic and Germanic based storehouse of knowledge.The Church became a major influence in Rome which became predominantly Christian by the year AD 200, and this added to the influence of the church as a major force in Britain.It was not until Elizabeth the First promoted and created the Church of England that the hold of Rome was lessened in matters of the Church in a permanent way in Britain. So we see that the racial heritage of Britain was culturally influenced by the old ways, by the philosophy and art of ancient Greece, by way of the Roman occupation which ended in Rome leaving Britain, but most of all by the legends and lore and culture of the ancient Northern European Caucasians from where the blood of the ancient British sprang.So yes – we have had waves of immigration over the centuries but in relatively small numbers, most who were assimilated into our culture and ALL were from the same racial stock. What we have had since 1948 with the arrival of the SS Windrush is an open door policy allowing people of any colour and culture to settle irrespective of numbers or culture or beliefs – nobody knows how many immigrants, illegal or otherwise are currently in our land. However the effects of this can be seen daily on our streets and in our schools and in our communities with race ghettos springing up and spates of anti-white attacks on our people –on our sons, and on our daughters, on our neighbours and on our friends. Taxes have increased to tyrannical levels and our freedom of speech is under direct threat from a government too cowardly to attack the problems but quite happy to betray their own people for the price of a vote. But we are the descendants of these proud and ancient British people, they never rolled over – we shouldnt either!
It has been said that the British are a mongrel race, that has neither the right nor the racial heritage needed to proclaim itself the land of a distinct people and that we have always had mass immigration throughout our history .
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Why is it important to establish the argument for a distinct people in the case of Britain and its history? It is important because without knowledge of our cultural and racial origins we are at risk of being demoralised when we are told that our people have no historical, cultural or racial core. It is true that Europe and Britain were settled long ago by Caucasian European tribes. It is true that as with all ancient formations of nations, the settling of lands, warfare and border disputes were indeed the norm. One cannot imagine that, as those Caucasian tribes struggled to settle and claim Britain , anything less than sporadic warfare and land disputes could have taken place. Such are the birth pains of any new nation in the ancient days when the un-tilled lands first felt the feet of the early British tribes. BUT – these tribes were all of common racial stock! So, why are we continually being told we are a "mongrel" nation made up of every hue and colour and creed under the sun? Because as I said a country and people with no sense of history, culture and self are divided and therefore easy pickings for the greedy politicians and their lickspittle sycophants that we have in power in Britain todayIt is said that the early British who settled this land were a disparate bunch of peoples who had nothing in common. The conclusions drawn from this argument will be that as Britain was settled by a variety of peoples (having nothing in common) that the peoples surely have no right to claim a natural racial ownership over the land or even to lay claim to the title," The British People".If you cannot lay claim to the right of being a people then you cannot defend the collective self from the argument that any and all foreign races should be allowed to cross the borders and subsequently to lay claim to the land even to the point of eradicating the culture of the British race. After all if a people are not recognised as a people, but only as a rag tag group of individuals with no common collective core, no rights to being known as a people then how can they insist that they have a unique culture to preserve and to protect? So we see the insidious nature of the argument which states that Britain is predominantly populated not by a people (the descendants of our forefathers who settled the land in ancient days), but by a myriad of races, having no common, ancient racial origin, which simply happened to have formed, in that which is now known as Britain.
COMMON BLOODLINES.
Actually the forefathers of the British race had everything in common as far as a common racial origin. Now some may argue against these conclusions, however those who would argue would most likely be the same individuals who would argue that the Swedes, the Norwegians and the Danes are very different in racial origin. This argument would be wrong and it would be to ignore the fact that these current nations were simply different parts of the same, huge Viking entity which once roamed the area as a whole tribe, but then split into nations over border warfare and disputes. It will amaze you when you realise just how much of a common racial bloodline the people who formed the British 'race' actually had. Let us look at the racial pattern we have set down for ourselves in history and you will see that we were once great Caucasian tribes. Britain was formed by the Caucasian race.It only takes a knowledge of history, (an untwisted account of history, one that is not tainted or twisted in word in order to present a false impression with which to demoralise a people), in order to quickly see that the facts of history lay out a very clear road map as to the common racial roots of those who formed Britain.Early settlersSo, who were the people who settled and created that which is now known as Britain and what did they have in common? What brought them together as a people? First off, the Celts were a tribe from the North of Europe. They were a northern tribe of Caucasians.Now let us look at the Normans. They were Vikings by race which means that they originated from a Northern European area thus they were a Northern tribe of Caucasians in origin. It is true that they mixed with the French in bloodline, but to argue that the French are not a distinct people just because the Vikings are a part of the French is as absurd as it is to argue that the British race does not exist just because we have had an influxes of settlers over the last two millenia. Let us look at the Danes. They were Vikings by race and thus a Northern European tribe. Let us look at the Picts. They were they were a Viking race (yes that does mean that they were at one time a Northern European tribe in origin) which intermarried with and were absorbed by the Scots who were speakers of the Irish (Gaelic) language.Let us look at the Saxons, the Jutes, the Angles, all people of northern or Germanic origin. Are you seeing the pattern? The Celtic peoples such as the Gaels, the Britons and the Belgae were much noted for being tall, blonde or red haired and blue eyed or light of eye. They were known for their tattooing. Picts or 'painted men' were known for their ferociousness in battle!Of course some British forefathers were shorter and some were taller and some were fair while some were pale and some a snowy white. Some had brunette hair and some white blonde or golden hues. We speak in general terms of the physical descriptions of the Viking races. Remember that Denmark and Sweden and Norway are all simply Viking tribes which broke apart as warfare and disputes broke out amongst them. They do not look identical and neither do you or i.Now, what pattern do we see in the forefathers of the British? We see that the people who settled Britain had a great deal in common when it comes to racial bloodlinesYes the Romans were in Britain just as they were once in France . It was in 55 and 54 BC, after Rome had conquered Gaul or as we call it now France that Gaius Julius Caesar decided that he needed to deploy troops to Britain to crush the British resistance. Is France not French because Rome was there? Is Britain not British because Rome was there? Of course this argument is ludicrous.Caesar was driven back from Britain when he met with fierce resistance from the free British peoples.After coming up against the fierce inhabitants of Britain a disgruntled Caesar decided it was best to return his troops to Gaul. Between 54BC and AD 43 trade links developed between Britain and Rome , but then Rome just had to try again and in AD 43 the Roman Emperor Claudius invaded Britain. He was met with a ferocious resistance by the indigenous British and could only conquer lowland England.The British were such a fierce people, such a proud people that even the might and glory of ancient Rome knew itself to be in serious peril when up against the British people. In AD 60 the Roman Suetonius Paulinus was campaigning in North Wales against the Druids, when a major anti Roman uprising was started by Boudicca who openly rebelled when her daughters were raped by roman occupiers.The major Roman settlements were destroyed in Britain before the uprising was defeated. Rome was now more certain than ever that Britons could be a terribly proud and fierce people when stirred, and if truth be told Rome never could conquer all of Britain. Highland scotland was never conquered by Rome and the areas of Britain which were conquered never would stay conquered. The British never did accept defeat. They simply would not stay down. In AD 409 the Imperial occupation of Britain came to an end.
Let us look at what the British took for themselves culturally from the days of the Roman occupation and we shall see how ancient Greece became an important part of the British people's culture. Whilst Roman empirical forces occupied warlike Britain , or shall we say "attempted" to occupy it? Remember that even the forces of the Roman Empire could never occupy or hold of all Britain . Many of the British incorporated much of the philosophical and educational ideology of Rome into their own lives.Now let us remember that much of Roman civilisation, culture, literature and art came almost entirely from ancient Greece. For example, no Roman of good family could have called himself truly cultured unless he was able to speak fluently in the Greek language and had a good knowledge of all Greek literature.The Celts likewise had made a strong impact in the collective Roman mind.We have already established the racial bloodline from where the British originated and all of this talk about the Romans and the Greeks is in regards to CULTURAL influences on the ancient British, not racial. It is also important to remember that the British ALREADY had their own arts and ideologies in place.They simply added, via ancient Rome, some of the best that ancient Greece had to offer by way of literature and philosophy, to their own vast Northern European, Celtic and Germanic based storehouse of knowledge.The Church became a major influence in Rome which became predominantly Christian by the year AD 200, and this added to the influence of the church as a major force in Britain.It was not until Elizabeth the First promoted and created the Church of England that the hold of Rome was lessened in matters of the Church in a permanent way in Britain. So we see that the racial heritage of Britain was culturally influenced by the old ways, by the philosophy and art of ancient Greece, by way of the Roman occupation which ended in Rome leaving Britain, but most of all by the legends and lore and culture of the ancient Northern European Caucasians from where the blood of the ancient British sprang.So yes – we have had waves of immigration over the centuries but in relatively small numbers, most who were assimilated into our culture and ALL were from the same racial stock. What we have had since 1948 with the arrival of the SS Windrush is an open door policy allowing people of any colour and culture to settle irrespective of numbers or culture or beliefs – nobody knows how many immigrants, illegal or otherwise are currently in our land. However the effects of this can be seen daily on our streets and in our schools and in our communities with race ghettos springing up and spates of anti-white attacks on our people –on our sons, and on our daughters, on our neighbours and on our friends. Taxes have increased to tyrannical levels and our freedom of speech is under direct threat from a government too cowardly to attack the problems but quite happy to betray their own people for the price of a vote. But we are the descendants of these proud and ancient British people, they never rolled over – we shouldnt either!
Wednesday, 14 November 2007
Welcome Back?..........
Just a quick line to say to anyone who still drops in here that after a layoff of several months i would hope to resume postings in the next week or so.
Thursday, 28 June 2007
"British" Moslems Burn Our Flag
When will our people learn these moslems want our land and our lives - The link says it all. Join the BNP and help.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQLpG5b18pk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQLpG5b18pk
Thursday, 14 June 2007
Sat-Nav Captured - Osama On Foot.....................
In a new development in the war in Afghanistan, American Forces today revealed how Osam Bin-Hidin has successfully eluded the forces hunting him. The americans stated "Osama has managed to keep three, i mean one, step ahead of us for years - with equipment like this its not hard to see why. Its dust-proof, weatherproof and can be operated in any cave in the world". The Taliban Taxi equipment that was seized is of a type said to be favoured by Osama himself, complete with "Hijab Hideaway" . (for getting thru allied checkpoints) and "As You Ride Prayer Mat" for the on-the-move-muslim as optional extras. The "Fatwa Tool Roll" with stones graded by size, as well as spanners, is currently under examination by american specialists.Note: Initially the U.S. Special Forces team who captured the Taliban Put Put failed to recognise the Sat-Nav due to most Afghan Moslems still believing the world is flat, and the SEALs had thought it belonged to an irish tourist until the "extras" were identified.
Monday, 11 June 2007
Charter For Nonces
Almost 8,000 sex offenders have escaped with a caution rather than being charged in the past five years, according to a report.
Among those were 1,600 offences involving children, 230 were for rape and 350 involved a victim under the age of 13. Responding to the report, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) insisted offenders were not being "let off", since the caution would still be noted on a criminal record and they would be entered on the sex offenders register. Who on earth do these idiots think they are kidding - they have been LET OFF!
Offences which attracted a caution included rape, child porn offences, bigamy, exploitation of prostitution, indecent exposure, sexual offences against animals, sexual grooming and incest.
Much of the information was obtained by using the Freedom of Information Act. Only one force, West Yorkshire Police, failed to provide figures, saying it would be too expensive to search for the results (yeah, - what with all those followers of the Dead Paedophile there, i bet it is!).
The ACPO said that before deciding whether to charge or caution, police would take into account the victim's views, age and welfare (and ethnicity?). Cautions would be given in circumstances where the victim of a rape did not turn up to give evidence at court (this is a complete lie - to need the witness to turn up in court the pervert must have been charged and had a date set for their appearance) , or sometimes if the case involved a 16-year-old boy having consensual sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend.
Terrence Grange, ACPO lead for sexual offences and chief constable of Dyfed Powys Police, said: "Every incident will be treated on its own merit, taking into account the circumstances of the incident and the people involved."
A spokesman for the new Ministry of Justice (that name sends a shiver down my spine) said "very few" of the cautions were for rape offences against children -very few? VERY FEW? These people should hang their heads in shame that they knowingly even let one paedophile pervert who RAPED A CHILD get away with a caution! The scum should be hanged. Every decent human being should be outraged that these perverted, sick animals have been let free to roam the streets by our law enforcement agencys!
The spokeman then said: "The Government is committed to securing more convictions in rape cases and has commissioned the child sex offender review to ensure that children are better protected from paedophiles. There are very few circumstances indeed where a caution for rape or offences against children is the most appropriate sanction (so WHY do it then?).
"Use of cautions is a matter for the police but in exceptional circumstances - for instance where the victim does not want to proceed with a prosecution - a caution will still result in the offender having to comply with the notification provisions of the sex offenders register". And thats it - the twisted animals can carry on pretty much as usual while the victim has the rest of his or her life to live with the knowledge that the law did nothing to punish the perverts.
William Wordsworth (English Poet)
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."
Among those were 1,600 offences involving children, 230 were for rape and 350 involved a victim under the age of 13. Responding to the report, the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) insisted offenders were not being "let off", since the caution would still be noted on a criminal record and they would be entered on the sex offenders register. Who on earth do these idiots think they are kidding - they have been LET OFF!
Offences which attracted a caution included rape, child porn offences, bigamy, exploitation of prostitution, indecent exposure, sexual offences against animals, sexual grooming and incest.
Much of the information was obtained by using the Freedom of Information Act. Only one force, West Yorkshire Police, failed to provide figures, saying it would be too expensive to search for the results (yeah, - what with all those followers of the Dead Paedophile there, i bet it is!).
The ACPO said that before deciding whether to charge or caution, police would take into account the victim's views, age and welfare (and ethnicity?). Cautions would be given in circumstances where the victim of a rape did not turn up to give evidence at court (this is a complete lie - to need the witness to turn up in court the pervert must have been charged and had a date set for their appearance) , or sometimes if the case involved a 16-year-old boy having consensual sex with his 15-year-old girlfriend.
Terrence Grange, ACPO lead for sexual offences and chief constable of Dyfed Powys Police, said: "Every incident will be treated on its own merit, taking into account the circumstances of the incident and the people involved."
A spokesman for the new Ministry of Justice (that name sends a shiver down my spine) said "very few" of the cautions were for rape offences against children -very few? VERY FEW? These people should hang their heads in shame that they knowingly even let one paedophile pervert who RAPED A CHILD get away with a caution! The scum should be hanged. Every decent human being should be outraged that these perverted, sick animals have been let free to roam the streets by our law enforcement agencys!
The spokeman then said: "The Government is committed to securing more convictions in rape cases and has commissioned the child sex offender review to ensure that children are better protected from paedophiles. There are very few circumstances indeed where a caution for rape or offences against children is the most appropriate sanction (so WHY do it then?).
"Use of cautions is a matter for the police but in exceptional circumstances - for instance where the victim does not want to proceed with a prosecution - a caution will still result in the offender having to comply with the notification provisions of the sex offenders register". And thats it - the twisted animals can carry on pretty much as usual while the victim has the rest of his or her life to live with the knowledge that the law did nothing to punish the perverts.
William Wordsworth (English Poet)
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."
Saturday, 9 June 2007
How Can The Main Parties Get It So Wrong?
Borders which do not keep economic migrants and terrorists out.
A European Union which is contemptuous of the democracies of its Member-States.
Schools which do not teach and qualifications which do not qualify.
Railways which were torn-up when it was foreseeable that our roads would become over-crowded.
TV channels which spread moral sewage and filth, as well as political propaganda, into the minds of our impressionable children.
A punishment system that does not punish real criminals and delinquents, and which prevents us from doing so.
A Human Rights Act which takes away our human rights.
And yet, if you notice any of these things, the main politicians add insult to injury by telling you that it is YOU, and not they, who are extreme!
WE STAND OR FALL AS A NATION and now the effects of what is happening in our country are now beginning to affect us significantly. For example:AFFORDABLE HOUSING SHORTAGES, JOB SHORTAGES, THE COMING WATER SHORTAGES AND EXCESSIVE BUILDING ON GREEN BELT LAND, TOO MANY TAXES AND TOO MANY JOBS FOR PEOPLE ‘WORKING’ IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT DOING FAKE JOBS. THE CREEPING ISLAMIFICATION OF OUR LAND (and YES it is OUR land!), THE INCREASE IN RACIST ATTACKS ON WHITE BRITISH PEOPLE. PATRONISING GOVERNMENT OFFICERS OFFERING HANDOUTS TO US WITH OUR OWN MONEY - DOUBTLESS TO KEEP US IN LINE! DON’T FALL FOR THAT ONE!
We in the British National Party, like you, are concerned about all of these things. And we will not be bullied into keeping silent by the somewhat witless name-calling that intimidates many folk, quite wrongly, into keeping quiet. We will speak out, and we do speak out when it is in the defence of our homeland and folk!
Join the BNP help us reclaim OUR country!
A European Union which is contemptuous of the democracies of its Member-States.
Schools which do not teach and qualifications which do not qualify.
Railways which were torn-up when it was foreseeable that our roads would become over-crowded.
TV channels which spread moral sewage and filth, as well as political propaganda, into the minds of our impressionable children.
A punishment system that does not punish real criminals and delinquents, and which prevents us from doing so.
A Human Rights Act which takes away our human rights.
And yet, if you notice any of these things, the main politicians add insult to injury by telling you that it is YOU, and not they, who are extreme!
WE STAND OR FALL AS A NATION and now the effects of what is happening in our country are now beginning to affect us significantly. For example:AFFORDABLE HOUSING SHORTAGES, JOB SHORTAGES, THE COMING WATER SHORTAGES AND EXCESSIVE BUILDING ON GREEN BELT LAND, TOO MANY TAXES AND TOO MANY JOBS FOR PEOPLE ‘WORKING’ IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT DOING FAKE JOBS. THE CREEPING ISLAMIFICATION OF OUR LAND (and YES it is OUR land!), THE INCREASE IN RACIST ATTACKS ON WHITE BRITISH PEOPLE. PATRONISING GOVERNMENT OFFICERS OFFERING HANDOUTS TO US WITH OUR OWN MONEY - DOUBTLESS TO KEEP US IN LINE! DON’T FALL FOR THAT ONE!
We in the British National Party, like you, are concerned about all of these things. And we will not be bullied into keeping silent by the somewhat witless name-calling that intimidates many folk, quite wrongly, into keeping quiet. We will speak out, and we do speak out when it is in the defence of our homeland and folk!
Join the BNP help us reclaim OUR country!
Friday, 8 June 2007
Store Wars - Join The Organic Rebellion
This has absolutely nothing to do with history or politics, but it is a great piece of animation and well worth watching!
http://www.storewars.org/flash/index.html
http://www.storewars.org/flash/index.html
This Day In The Falklands War
8th June
Plymouth in Falkland Sound is hit by 4 Argentine bombs but none explode;
Sir Galahad and Sir Tristram are bombed at Fitzroy while the Welsh Guards are waiting to disembark - 51 die including 38 Welsh Guards and 55 are seriously wounded;
War cabinet asked not to reveal Fitzroy casualties;
Landing craft Foxtrot-4 sunk with British vehicles aboard;
3 Argentine skyhawks are shot down by sea harriers;
General Moore finalises battle plan for Stanley
Plymouth in Falkland Sound is hit by 4 Argentine bombs but none explode;
Sir Galahad and Sir Tristram are bombed at Fitzroy while the Welsh Guards are waiting to disembark - 51 die including 38 Welsh Guards and 55 are seriously wounded;
War cabinet asked not to reveal Fitzroy casualties;
Landing craft Foxtrot-4 sunk with British vehicles aboard;
3 Argentine skyhawks are shot down by sea harriers;
General Moore finalises battle plan for Stanley
Falklands Anniversary - June 14th 1982 - War Over
A reminder of the sacrifices made by our forces to recapture the Falkland Islands from the Argies - a bit different to the last lot of our sailors who were recently "captured" by the Iranians without firing a shot! When the argies invaded the Falklands the small contingent of Royal Marines based there fought bravely against a massive invasion force and surrendered only when there was no further hope. I was a young man in the forces at the time and for me the war, short though it was, still resonates. I was not involved in the campaign but for me the following images and thoughts are still with me.
The bravery of the Royal Marines during the invasion
The Captain of the Atlantic Conveyor going down with his ship
The bombing of the Sir Galahad and Sheffield = the news reports were ghastly to watch
The cheers in our pubs whenever John Nott (then defence spokesman) announced any argy planes shot down
The silence in the same pubs when one of ours was shot down, and the same when we lost ships
The courage and fortitude of the marines and paras in extreme conditions
The VC awarded to Colonel H.Jones and the almost forgotten Sgt.McKay who was with him.
We are proud of you all.
Islam Exposed
Almost every ‘mainstream’ politician has said that Islam is a religion of peace and that Islam means peace. But are they telling the truth about Islam? To ask that question is to be almost sure of the answer. In fact the word Islam does not mean peace, it means submission; and the faith of Islam is very far from being peaceful in the means that is uses to spread and maintain both the religion itself and what it feels is its right to dominance over others - their lands, their thoughts, their cultures, their legal systems; and their whole state and political and economic system. Indeed, in denying the truth about Islam, the ‘mainstream’ politicians are engaged in a whole-scale scheme of falsehood. This is not unique by any means: they have done the same sort of thing with regard to the real nature and intent of what was at first put across merely as a Common Market; and they have, for several decades, been selling the idea of the multi-racial and multi-cultural society as though it was voluntary, had no dangers for us, and had been done with our consent. So it should not surprise us if there is something fishy about this new line that they have taken - after the September 11th attacks in New York and the London bombings - that Islam means peace; and that peace is all that there is to Islam. If only that were the case; but it is not.
There are certainly a number of different views on Islam. One viewpoint, which is quite prevalent, is that Islam is a religion of peace because it is a religion. Religion is all about peace, is it not? Christianity is about peace and all religions are about the same God; and so Islam, for that reason as well, will be peaceful. The suicide bombers were merely misguided young men who hijacked an essentially good religion and used it to an evil purpose, much like many have done with Christianity (the Crusades would be mentioned at this point); and they had been forced to such extremism by the provocation meted out to the Palestinians by the wicked West, the Israelis, and the Zionists. Poor suicide bombers, one might think. This is not so much a viewpoint as a blind spot - blind to every thing in front of it; and is not worthy of any further treatment however much it resonates with highly-paid human rights lawyer, Cherrie Blair.
A second view of Islam does not attribute the peace of Christianity to the religion of Mohammed quite so directly; it recognises that Islam is more than a Nazarene sect with a towel on its head, and that it does have a holy book and recorded traditions of its own; drawn from its own distinctive cultural and revelational milieu. Nonetheless, it too tends to equate religion with what we have come to expect of religion as heavily influenced in the West by our ethos of Christianity. The god of Islam may well be different, this view says, and his ways in many respects at variance to those of Jehovah; but - out of respect for multi-culturalism, and welcoming ‘the other’, as well as respect for the truth (and there can be no conflict between the two) - we cannot, and must not judge, Islam by our own far from perfect Western standards. Islam will likewise be tolerant of us if we only play fair: everyone is basically decent, and if we do the plain decent thing to them, they will surely reciprocate, since all cultures have much to give; and they do not really look upon us as ‘infidels’ anymore, if they ever really did.
A third view of Islam says that Islam is a violent religion implacably hostile to all that is good and non-Muslim in the world, known as ‘the abode of war‘; and that the design and intent of Islam is to wreak havoc, ruin, mayhem, and death upon all the heathen, Jews, and Christians - unless they either convert (Allah is merciful), or submit to pay the dhimmi tax, and agree to survive as second class citizens in a Muslim dominated state, where they have little influence and cannot proselytise. There can be no doubt that - in the light of many Koranic surahs (verses) and in the face both of Islamic sharia (law) and the written hadiths or traditions of what Mohammed said and did - there is much to commend itself in this view of Islam. And yet we all feel - if we know any Muslims, that is - that this view is very harsh on some or many of the Muslims that we do know, or did know, not so very long ago. They were the last people, we feel, who could turn on us, or harbour murderers, fanatical terrorists, or rapists in our midst. It smacks too much of the view, held in world war two, that every German was a Nazi; that all Nazis were bad; and that the only good German was a dead German. However, much truth there may be in the third view, it is being taken too far if it means something like that. And the fact of the matter, I think, is that the warlike character of Islam - though a very important part of the picture - is, yet, only part of the whole picture. It is not the whole truth. If it was the whole of the obvious truth about Islam, many - indeed, I believe, most Muslims - might recoil from Islam in horror.
Whenever we study any evil and totalitarian regime, whether religious or secular, we must understand that the truth or reality about it is much less obvious to those caught up in it than we usually suppose. So we must be careful in judging others. Evil comes in many guises, or should we say disguises; if it did not, it would have far fewer followers. And whatever you make of the suicide bombers, or mass murderers - and however hard this may be for us to take - some of them, at least, thought (in some way) that they were doing good: the will of a good Allah, and not that of a monster. I am by no means making an apology for radical or mainstream Islam (the two really only differ in tactics and pace, not in the ends and the means, if needed); but we still, as difficult as it may appear, have to see things from their point of view (as well as our own) before we finally evaluate their religion. This is known as empathy, and is quite different to sympathy.
So what is the whole truth about Islam. Well it will help if we evaluate it in its parts and then stand back from the canvass, so to speak, and see the whole: how each different part relates to every other part; what is each part’s character; and, vitally, what is the tendency and intent which emerges from the whole when put together -when the whole is much more than the sum of its parts when disconnected. An illustration may serve to help. Let us imagine a disassembled bicycle in all sits separate parts. We see that each part has a design and function - some parts are clearly moving parts, and some parts are fixed parts; and some parts do not seem to make any sense at all. The bell, to make noises, does not seem to be part of a bike but part of some strange musical band. Then if, in our minds at least, we put all these parts together correctly, we see that each part has a relation to the whole even when - considered in isolation - they did not quite seem to fit what we had heard about conveyances. It is like that with every political or belief system that we come across. Each part has a unique function (not always obvious) in relation to the other parts and in regard to the overall purpose; not merely of any one part, but of the whole together.
To change the picture somewhat let us not imagine a human artefact, such as a bicycle, but a living organism such as a cell. Every political or religious belief-system (and every scientific theory for that matter), if it is to survive and propagate - that is to convert and sustain confidence - it must be able to explain things and to fight off gainsaying arguments and conflicting evidence. Somewhere in the belief system there will be a set of values, and a collection of arguments, that act as a defence mechanism saying that the belief-system is good and worthy and that its competitors, opponents, or detractors are either wrong or bad, in some vital way, or both. And that is the subtlety of every belief system. Not everyone who was involved in the Holy Inquisition did so from the lowest of motives; quite the reverse. The same was true of every other form of evil. The French Revolution’s reign of terror was propagated by many who thought of doing only good and were loyal to the ideals of ‘liberty, equality, and fraternity’; as the ‘brotherhood republics’ of Red China, North Korea, Viet Nam, and the Soviet Union were dedicated also to the ideal of ‘equality’. So the fact that Islam attracts good people with only good intentions, high morals, and respectable civic virtues should not surprise us. These other causes have done so too.
So, what do we make of Islam? Well it is essentially organised around a principle of violence, to put it crudely, or - to put it in a more nuanced and self-justifying way (remember the analogy of the cell fighting of its detractors) - it is Allah’s mandated way of converting the world to his truth preferably by persuasion, if possible, but by military jihad and compulsion, if need be.
Yes, Islam is a religion; but that means, in its own terms so different to the West, that it is an army too. It is also a one-party state and political system. Like any army every member is a warrior but not all warriors are combatants in the front line. All are literally in uniform so to speak (as you would expect of an army) but many only contribute indirectly to the overall job of ‘spreading the faith’ - just as with the bicycle only some of the parts contribute directly to its movement by moving themselves. Yes, the faith must be spread in the end by the sword if necessary; but only if necessary. In that sense Islam could well be seen as a religion of peace. And if the approach of peaceful persuasion does not succeed there are many other ways, short of actual violence, but involving force which can ‘persuade’. For example the show of force to induce the non-Muslim world to convert willingly or to be cowed into submission, may suffice. War and violence, terrorism and intimidation are only some of the means of carrying on the mission. In ‘peaceful’ Islamic theory, war should be the servant of the mission, not its master. So, yes, militant mainstream Islam does have a peaceful side to it. But then so too does a battleship. The USS Missouri did not have to always fire its guns in anger to have the needed effect. It could attain its objective, at times, merely by the threat of force or by its very appearance and presence. The use of force may not always be needed, or desirable. Voluntary conversions to Islam do take place when it is portrayed in the rose coloured spectacles of the Western ‘liberals’. So, why war when you can succeed without it? But, alas, those who perhaps willingly and winsomely come into Islam rarely, if ever, are so free or willing to renounce it. It is not the way into a religion which is important - to see whether the religion is free or not - but the way out of it, which is often the more telling.
Certainly many Muslims are wholly peaceful and would never do the kind of things that their religious compatriots would do; but does that matter? Not every part on the assembled bicycle was a moving part but the bicycle is nonetheless designed to move; and not every sailor on the USS Missouri was a gunner or an aimer, or a target-locater and identifier; but yet - whether cook or laundryman - all too obviously peaceful roles - each contributed an essential part to the fighting nature of the whole. We must not infer the role of the whole from the limited use and peaceful function of a part. What matters in that sense is not the individual but the whole. For it is as a whole that it operates.
It is mainstream Islamic policy in Europe, under the orders of the Muslim Council of Europe, that no Muslim can lead a good Muslim life outside of his community; that all Muslims can only express a good and religious life in community with other Muslims around a Mosque; and that Muslims must congregate as Muslims in specified areas (encampments?) from which they can dominate a locality and from which they can then spread out. The army has a strategy; and it looks like an army - a religious army but an army nonetheless. One can hardly blame it, in one sense, for following through, and working out in practice, the teachings of its own holy book together with the written down traditions of their prophet. Islam is behaving in character and according to its nature and its purposes as, it believes it is, God’s true and noble religion. The truth must dominate and prevail; and it must do so in this life. What is surprising about the whole situation is not the ‘suicide’ bombings, the honour killings, the violence and intimidation of the few over the many, the paedophile-weddings, the rapes and enslavings of those taken in war - for all these are part of its nature, its teachings, its principles and its history; what is surprising is that the self-styled ‘liberal’ and ‘do-gooder’ elite have imagined that it could have been otherwise. Perhaps, just perhaps, it could have been; but the fact is that it is not, nor is it likely to be, with the policies being vigorously perused by the current ‘powers that be’ over Islam and over the West. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Thanks to my my good friend the Reverend Robert West (Christian Council of Britain) for his permission to reproduce this article. As with all posts feel free to link with acknowledgement.
The Lincolnshire Patriot
There are certainly a number of different views on Islam. One viewpoint, which is quite prevalent, is that Islam is a religion of peace because it is a religion. Religion is all about peace, is it not? Christianity is about peace and all religions are about the same God; and so Islam, for that reason as well, will be peaceful. The suicide bombers were merely misguided young men who hijacked an essentially good religion and used it to an evil purpose, much like many have done with Christianity (the Crusades would be mentioned at this point); and they had been forced to such extremism by the provocation meted out to the Palestinians by the wicked West, the Israelis, and the Zionists. Poor suicide bombers, one might think. This is not so much a viewpoint as a blind spot - blind to every thing in front of it; and is not worthy of any further treatment however much it resonates with highly-paid human rights lawyer, Cherrie Blair.
A second view of Islam does not attribute the peace of Christianity to the religion of Mohammed quite so directly; it recognises that Islam is more than a Nazarene sect with a towel on its head, and that it does have a holy book and recorded traditions of its own; drawn from its own distinctive cultural and revelational milieu. Nonetheless, it too tends to equate religion with what we have come to expect of religion as heavily influenced in the West by our ethos of Christianity. The god of Islam may well be different, this view says, and his ways in many respects at variance to those of Jehovah; but - out of respect for multi-culturalism, and welcoming ‘the other’, as well as respect for the truth (and there can be no conflict between the two) - we cannot, and must not judge, Islam by our own far from perfect Western standards. Islam will likewise be tolerant of us if we only play fair: everyone is basically decent, and if we do the plain decent thing to them, they will surely reciprocate, since all cultures have much to give; and they do not really look upon us as ‘infidels’ anymore, if they ever really did.
A third view of Islam says that Islam is a violent religion implacably hostile to all that is good and non-Muslim in the world, known as ‘the abode of war‘; and that the design and intent of Islam is to wreak havoc, ruin, mayhem, and death upon all the heathen, Jews, and Christians - unless they either convert (Allah is merciful), or submit to pay the dhimmi tax, and agree to survive as second class citizens in a Muslim dominated state, where they have little influence and cannot proselytise. There can be no doubt that - in the light of many Koranic surahs (verses) and in the face both of Islamic sharia (law) and the written hadiths or traditions of what Mohammed said and did - there is much to commend itself in this view of Islam. And yet we all feel - if we know any Muslims, that is - that this view is very harsh on some or many of the Muslims that we do know, or did know, not so very long ago. They were the last people, we feel, who could turn on us, or harbour murderers, fanatical terrorists, or rapists in our midst. It smacks too much of the view, held in world war two, that every German was a Nazi; that all Nazis were bad; and that the only good German was a dead German. However, much truth there may be in the third view, it is being taken too far if it means something like that. And the fact of the matter, I think, is that the warlike character of Islam - though a very important part of the picture - is, yet, only part of the whole picture. It is not the whole truth. If it was the whole of the obvious truth about Islam, many - indeed, I believe, most Muslims - might recoil from Islam in horror.
Whenever we study any evil and totalitarian regime, whether religious or secular, we must understand that the truth or reality about it is much less obvious to those caught up in it than we usually suppose. So we must be careful in judging others. Evil comes in many guises, or should we say disguises; if it did not, it would have far fewer followers. And whatever you make of the suicide bombers, or mass murderers - and however hard this may be for us to take - some of them, at least, thought (in some way) that they were doing good: the will of a good Allah, and not that of a monster. I am by no means making an apology for radical or mainstream Islam (the two really only differ in tactics and pace, not in the ends and the means, if needed); but we still, as difficult as it may appear, have to see things from their point of view (as well as our own) before we finally evaluate their religion. This is known as empathy, and is quite different to sympathy.
So what is the whole truth about Islam. Well it will help if we evaluate it in its parts and then stand back from the canvass, so to speak, and see the whole: how each different part relates to every other part; what is each part’s character; and, vitally, what is the tendency and intent which emerges from the whole when put together -when the whole is much more than the sum of its parts when disconnected. An illustration may serve to help. Let us imagine a disassembled bicycle in all sits separate parts. We see that each part has a design and function - some parts are clearly moving parts, and some parts are fixed parts; and some parts do not seem to make any sense at all. The bell, to make noises, does not seem to be part of a bike but part of some strange musical band. Then if, in our minds at least, we put all these parts together correctly, we see that each part has a relation to the whole even when - considered in isolation - they did not quite seem to fit what we had heard about conveyances. It is like that with every political or belief system that we come across. Each part has a unique function (not always obvious) in relation to the other parts and in regard to the overall purpose; not merely of any one part, but of the whole together.
To change the picture somewhat let us not imagine a human artefact, such as a bicycle, but a living organism such as a cell. Every political or religious belief-system (and every scientific theory for that matter), if it is to survive and propagate - that is to convert and sustain confidence - it must be able to explain things and to fight off gainsaying arguments and conflicting evidence. Somewhere in the belief system there will be a set of values, and a collection of arguments, that act as a defence mechanism saying that the belief-system is good and worthy and that its competitors, opponents, or detractors are either wrong or bad, in some vital way, or both. And that is the subtlety of every belief system. Not everyone who was involved in the Holy Inquisition did so from the lowest of motives; quite the reverse. The same was true of every other form of evil. The French Revolution’s reign of terror was propagated by many who thought of doing only good and were loyal to the ideals of ‘liberty, equality, and fraternity’; as the ‘brotherhood republics’ of Red China, North Korea, Viet Nam, and the Soviet Union were dedicated also to the ideal of ‘equality’. So the fact that Islam attracts good people with only good intentions, high morals, and respectable civic virtues should not surprise us. These other causes have done so too.
So, what do we make of Islam? Well it is essentially organised around a principle of violence, to put it crudely, or - to put it in a more nuanced and self-justifying way (remember the analogy of the cell fighting of its detractors) - it is Allah’s mandated way of converting the world to his truth preferably by persuasion, if possible, but by military jihad and compulsion, if need be.
Yes, Islam is a religion; but that means, in its own terms so different to the West, that it is an army too. It is also a one-party state and political system. Like any army every member is a warrior but not all warriors are combatants in the front line. All are literally in uniform so to speak (as you would expect of an army) but many only contribute indirectly to the overall job of ‘spreading the faith’ - just as with the bicycle only some of the parts contribute directly to its movement by moving themselves. Yes, the faith must be spread in the end by the sword if necessary; but only if necessary. In that sense Islam could well be seen as a religion of peace. And if the approach of peaceful persuasion does not succeed there are many other ways, short of actual violence, but involving force which can ‘persuade’. For example the show of force to induce the non-Muslim world to convert willingly or to be cowed into submission, may suffice. War and violence, terrorism and intimidation are only some of the means of carrying on the mission. In ‘peaceful’ Islamic theory, war should be the servant of the mission, not its master. So, yes, militant mainstream Islam does have a peaceful side to it. But then so too does a battleship. The USS Missouri did not have to always fire its guns in anger to have the needed effect. It could attain its objective, at times, merely by the threat of force or by its very appearance and presence. The use of force may not always be needed, or desirable. Voluntary conversions to Islam do take place when it is portrayed in the rose coloured spectacles of the Western ‘liberals’. So, why war when you can succeed without it? But, alas, those who perhaps willingly and winsomely come into Islam rarely, if ever, are so free or willing to renounce it. It is not the way into a religion which is important - to see whether the religion is free or not - but the way out of it, which is often the more telling.
Certainly many Muslims are wholly peaceful and would never do the kind of things that their religious compatriots would do; but does that matter? Not every part on the assembled bicycle was a moving part but the bicycle is nonetheless designed to move; and not every sailor on the USS Missouri was a gunner or an aimer, or a target-locater and identifier; but yet - whether cook or laundryman - all too obviously peaceful roles - each contributed an essential part to the fighting nature of the whole. We must not infer the role of the whole from the limited use and peaceful function of a part. What matters in that sense is not the individual but the whole. For it is as a whole that it operates.
It is mainstream Islamic policy in Europe, under the orders of the Muslim Council of Europe, that no Muslim can lead a good Muslim life outside of his community; that all Muslims can only express a good and religious life in community with other Muslims around a Mosque; and that Muslims must congregate as Muslims in specified areas (encampments?) from which they can dominate a locality and from which they can then spread out. The army has a strategy; and it looks like an army - a religious army but an army nonetheless. One can hardly blame it, in one sense, for following through, and working out in practice, the teachings of its own holy book together with the written down traditions of their prophet. Islam is behaving in character and according to its nature and its purposes as, it believes it is, God’s true and noble religion. The truth must dominate and prevail; and it must do so in this life. What is surprising about the whole situation is not the ‘suicide’ bombings, the honour killings, the violence and intimidation of the few over the many, the paedophile-weddings, the rapes and enslavings of those taken in war - for all these are part of its nature, its teachings, its principles and its history; what is surprising is that the self-styled ‘liberal’ and ‘do-gooder’ elite have imagined that it could have been otherwise. Perhaps, just perhaps, it could have been; but the fact is that it is not, nor is it likely to be, with the policies being vigorously perused by the current ‘powers that be’ over Islam and over the West. There are none so blind as those who will not see.
Thanks to my my good friend the Reverend Robert West (Christian Council of Britain) for his permission to reproduce this article. As with all posts feel free to link with acknowledgement.
The Lincolnshire Patriot
Thursday, 7 June 2007
Another Sickening Attack
Mary Sear was determined to lead an active, independent life.
The widowed great-grandmother lived alone and went out in all weathers to do her shopping.
On the morning of her 96th birthday, she walked the half mile to her daughter's house to receive her cards and gifts from the family.
And on the way home, she was knocked to the ground as a mugger took her handbag.
He rifled through her birthday cards, shaking out the birthday money they contained.
Mrs Sear, from Harrow, North-West London, died of a heart attack six days later in hospital, where she was being treated for a broken hip and shoulder.
IF the case is officially classified as homicide, she could make history as Britain's oldest murder victim. Some consolation to her family eh?
Until now, Harrow, whose MP is Tony McNulty, had been considered one of London's safest boroughs (but that in itself is nothing to be proud of as all through the country violent crime is escalating and nowhere is as safe as it was just a few years ago)
The incident is further evidence of the burgeoning street crime which leaves the elderly in fear.
Conservative councillor Susan Hall described the attack as horrific.
"It is absolutely shocking, something we would never expect to happen here," she said.
"My personal view is that if you shock someone into death, that is the same as putting a gun to their head.
"This was an innocent old lady going about her business."
The mugging happened on Tuesday last week.
The day after, a man of 27 faced court accused of two robberies, including that of Mrs Sear.
Further charges could be considered following her death. A Scotland Yard source said that to mount a successful prosecution for murder, officers will have to establish a direct link between the robbery and Mrs Sear's death.
"It's difficult, but not impossible," said one. "Murder squad officers are on standby to deal with the case."
In a statement, Mrs Sear's heartbroken family said: "She was a wonderful mother, grandmother and great grandmother who will be sorely missed."
The mugging left her in a terrible state. Until then she had been a perfectly independent lady.
"Although she was 96 she got about and visited her family. I saw her in hospital after the attack and she had a broken hip and was really bashed up."
It is way past the time when we should be dealing properly with lowlife scum like this 27 year old piece-of-shit. If a victim dies after a robbery then the criminal scum should be jailed for life. We have to much fannying around with this sort of thing, trying to make sure 110% that the poor criminal was directly responsible for the death. He robbed her, she died - end of story - jail him for life. Our liberal politicians will never bring back the death penalty, being more concerned with the rights and wants of the criminals, and to hell with the victims and their families! Its time this country got its guts back and started hanging drug-traffickers, terrorists, child killers and paedophiles as well as animals like the vermin who robbed and killed this 96 year old lady. Life should mean a minimum of 25 years not the paltry few years in a comfortable cell most end up serving. You should realise there is NO war on terror, NO war on crime - just soft soap as usual.
Sir Winston Churchill
"Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar."
The widowed great-grandmother lived alone and went out in all weathers to do her shopping.
On the morning of her 96th birthday, she walked the half mile to her daughter's house to receive her cards and gifts from the family.
And on the way home, she was knocked to the ground as a mugger took her handbag.
He rifled through her birthday cards, shaking out the birthday money they contained.
Mrs Sear, from Harrow, North-West London, died of a heart attack six days later in hospital, where she was being treated for a broken hip and shoulder.
IF the case is officially classified as homicide, she could make history as Britain's oldest murder victim. Some consolation to her family eh?
Until now, Harrow, whose MP is Tony McNulty, had been considered one of London's safest boroughs (but that in itself is nothing to be proud of as all through the country violent crime is escalating and nowhere is as safe as it was just a few years ago)
The incident is further evidence of the burgeoning street crime which leaves the elderly in fear.
Conservative councillor Susan Hall described the attack as horrific.
"It is absolutely shocking, something we would never expect to happen here," she said.
"My personal view is that if you shock someone into death, that is the same as putting a gun to their head.
"This was an innocent old lady going about her business."
The mugging happened on Tuesday last week.
The day after, a man of 27 faced court accused of two robberies, including that of Mrs Sear.
Further charges could be considered following her death. A Scotland Yard source said that to mount a successful prosecution for murder, officers will have to establish a direct link between the robbery and Mrs Sear's death.
"It's difficult, but not impossible," said one. "Murder squad officers are on standby to deal with the case."
In a statement, Mrs Sear's heartbroken family said: "She was a wonderful mother, grandmother and great grandmother who will be sorely missed."
The mugging left her in a terrible state. Until then she had been a perfectly independent lady.
"Although she was 96 she got about and visited her family. I saw her in hospital after the attack and she had a broken hip and was really bashed up."
It is way past the time when we should be dealing properly with lowlife scum like this 27 year old piece-of-shit. If a victim dies after a robbery then the criminal scum should be jailed for life. We have to much fannying around with this sort of thing, trying to make sure 110% that the poor criminal was directly responsible for the death. He robbed her, she died - end of story - jail him for life. Our liberal politicians will never bring back the death penalty, being more concerned with the rights and wants of the criminals, and to hell with the victims and their families! Its time this country got its guts back and started hanging drug-traffickers, terrorists, child killers and paedophiles as well as animals like the vermin who robbed and killed this 96 year old lady. Life should mean a minimum of 25 years not the paltry few years in a comfortable cell most end up serving. You should realise there is NO war on terror, NO war on crime - just soft soap as usual.
Sir Winston Churchill
"Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar."
Pegasus Bridge - June 6th 1944
The British 6th Airborne was given the task of securing the most easterly areas of the British landing beaches. This included the estuary of the River Orne and the Canal de Caen. This involved the capture and destruction of the German coastal battery at Merville, and the seizure, intact, of the two bridges at Benouville. One bridge spanned the river Orne and the other the Caen canal. It was vital these two bridges were captured intact to ensure the road inland was open for the advancing Allied Forces due to hit hit the beaches that morning.
The Divisional Commander, Major General Richard Gale decided to send in a special force of six gliders, carrying a force of 180 men. Three gliders would land and take the river bridge. The other three would land and take the canal bridge.For this mission the men of D Company, 2nd Battalion, Oxfordshire and Buckinghampshire Light Infantry (Ox and Bucks) were selected along with Royal Engineers from 'B' company and pilots of the Glider Pilots Regiment.
Major John Howard and his men evacuated the glider as quickly as possible, and attacked the bridge. The German defenders were taken by surprise. Lieutenant Brotheridge who led the attack across the bridge was shot in the neck and became the first Allied soldier killed on D Day. The men from the other two gliders joined the battle and within 5 minutes the bridge was secured. Five men were wounded in the battle for the canal bridge.
Of the gliders which were designated for the Orne river bridge, two landed within 300 and 700 meters from the target and one missed completely. When the bridge was attacked it was found to be undefended, the German troops had fled.
The two bridges had to be secured and held until the rest of the 6th Airborne, which had parachuted in, could relieve the Ox and Bucks, which was no easy task as the Germans launched two ferocious counterattacks including armour (tanks) - this was soon put out of action by Sgt. Thornton using a PIAT (projectile-infantry-anti-tank) gun, from very close range. The paratroops finally arrived at 3.00a.m. to the relief of Major Howard and his men. A brilliant feat had been accomplished, the two bridges had been secured, the road-link was open, ready for the invading allied troops due to arrive from the beacheads.
When you think that the gliders were released from their tug aircraft at 5,000 ft. in darkness, using only maps and stop watches, it is understandable that it was described as the "Finest piece of airmanship of the war"
The Divisional Commander, Major General Richard Gale decided to send in a special force of six gliders, carrying a force of 180 men. Three gliders would land and take the river bridge. The other three would land and take the canal bridge.For this mission the men of D Company, 2nd Battalion, Oxfordshire and Buckinghampshire Light Infantry (Ox and Bucks) were selected along with Royal Engineers from 'B' company and pilots of the Glider Pilots Regiment.
Major John Howard and his men evacuated the glider as quickly as possible, and attacked the bridge. The German defenders were taken by surprise. Lieutenant Brotheridge who led the attack across the bridge was shot in the neck and became the first Allied soldier killed on D Day. The men from the other two gliders joined the battle and within 5 minutes the bridge was secured. Five men were wounded in the battle for the canal bridge.
Of the gliders which were designated for the Orne river bridge, two landed within 300 and 700 meters from the target and one missed completely. When the bridge was attacked it was found to be undefended, the German troops had fled.
The two bridges had to be secured and held until the rest of the 6th Airborne, which had parachuted in, could relieve the Ox and Bucks, which was no easy task as the Germans launched two ferocious counterattacks including armour (tanks) - this was soon put out of action by Sgt. Thornton using a PIAT (projectile-infantry-anti-tank) gun, from very close range. The paratroops finally arrived at 3.00a.m. to the relief of Major Howard and his men. A brilliant feat had been accomplished, the two bridges had been secured, the road-link was open, ready for the invading allied troops due to arrive from the beacheads.
When you think that the gliders were released from their tug aircraft at 5,000 ft. in darkness, using only maps and stop watches, it is understandable that it was described as the "Finest piece of airmanship of the war"
D-Day 6th June 1944 - Lest We Forget
Why do you still march old man,
With medals on your chest?
Why do you still grieve old man,
For those friends you laid to rest?
Why do your eyes gleam old man,
When you hear the bugles blow?
Tell me why you cry old man,
About those days so long ago?
I'll tell you why i march young man,
With medals on my chest,
I'll tell you why i grieve young man,
For those i laid to rest,
Through misty fields of gossamer silk,
Come visions of distant times,
When boys of tender age lost lives,
And all their mothers pined.
We buried them in a blanket shroud,
Their young flesh scorched and blackened,
In a communal grave, newly gouged,
In bloodstained gorse and bracken.
And you ask me why i march young man,
I march to remind you all,
That but for those apple blossom youths,
You'd never have known freedom at all.
Rupert Brooke (1887-1915) - English poet
"If I should die, think only this of me: That there's some corner of a foreign field that is for ever England. There shall be in that rich earth a richer dust concealed; A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, A body of England's, breathing English air, Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.
And think, this heart, all evil shed away, A pulse in the eternal mind, no less Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given; Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day; And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness, In hearts at peace, under an English heaven".
("The Soldier" - 1914)
With medals on your chest?
Why do you still grieve old man,
For those friends you laid to rest?
Why do your eyes gleam old man,
When you hear the bugles blow?
Tell me why you cry old man,
About those days so long ago?
I'll tell you why i march young man,
With medals on my chest,
I'll tell you why i grieve young man,
For those i laid to rest,
Through misty fields of gossamer silk,
Come visions of distant times,
When boys of tender age lost lives,
And all their mothers pined.
We buried them in a blanket shroud,
Their young flesh scorched and blackened,
In a communal grave, newly gouged,
In bloodstained gorse and bracken.
And you ask me why i march young man,
I march to remind you all,
That but for those apple blossom youths,
You'd never have known freedom at all.
Rupert Brooke (1887-1915) - English poet
"If I should die, think only this of me: That there's some corner of a foreign field that is for ever England. There shall be in that rich earth a richer dust concealed; A dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, Gave, once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, A body of England's, breathing English air, Washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.
And think, this heart, all evil shed away, A pulse in the eternal mind, no less Gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given; Her sights and sounds; dreams happy as her day; And laughter, learnt of friends; and gentleness, In hearts at peace, under an English heaven".
("The Soldier" - 1914)
Thursday, 31 May 2007
Hydrophobia
Well, i am not quite foaming at the mouth but its surprising that i am not with the poisonous pro homo propaganda being taught to our youngsters. Schools here in Lincolnshire have rolled out a number of books extolling the "alternative" lifestyle "option" of homosexulaity. This filth is being peddled to children as young as four. Here in the sick and twisted minds of our so-called liberal government the normalisation of the abnormal and the abnormalisation of the normal is the order of the day. Speak out and you are immediately villified as "homophobic" (whatever the hell that means) and this is designed to make you feel the odd one out. The Bible describes homosexuality as an abomination (brings a whole new meaning to Sodom and Gommorah). Even the Muslims are anti (must have slipped past mohammed, that one). The fact is it does exist BUT that does not mean it should be promoted as normal. The main driver of life on earth is procreation - the survival of the species. This means having children, and however you dress up homosexuality, they cannot have offspring. Less than fifty years ago homosexuality was illegal in this country. This was beacause in those not so far off days the law of the land recognised homosexuality as wrong, in both the biblical and natural sense. Our government, a government with absolutely no moral compass, is failing our society by allowing an anything goes culture, with minority groups screaming for their "rights", and with never a thought for anything or anyone outside of their own small sphere of self gratification. The teaching of homosexuality in our schools, and anywhere else for that matter, is a direct contradiction of this countrys christian values and as such should be immediately removed from all curriculums and from all public exposure.
Friday, 4 May 2007
Holbeach Town Ward Results
It is under a year since Cllr Revd Robert West fled from the CONservatives as one of their District Councillors and found political asylum from Cameron's mind-bending 'political correctness' with the British National Party.
Now on 3rd May 2007 the Holbeach Town Ward Unit of the BNP contested the same three-Member ward and achieved 2000 votes for its three candidates whilst the Tories - with 3,000 votes - took all the three vacancies for the town. The Independents trailed with about 1,000 votes. Cheers of triumph resounded from the Tory side when it became clear that Revd West had failed to regain his seat, this time as a BNP candidate. However, elation soon turned to grimace as, on local TV and to the local press, the Revd graciously castigated the Conservative Party as leading this country to ruin; and pointed out - in his full clerical garb - how only the BNP could turn Britain round to achieve what is right and capture the values that made us what we are, what we once were; and what we should be in the futurre. There was no air of defeat about the Holbeach BNP Unit - far from it with such a result from nowhere and in such a short period of political time.
In the bigger scheme of things the result in Holbeach is a major success: it shows what can be done with dedication even in one of Toryland's safest seats and wards. Watch-out traitor-tory con-man: the BNP are here, and we are here to stay. But neither will we be resting on our laurels. Many lessons have been learnt and will continue to be learned in the next few months and years as we work for total victory in our country over the forces of wickedness which seek to engulf us.
The detailed breakdown was as follows:
Francis Biggadyke (Conservative) 1116
Rudkin (Conservative) 893
Michael Taylor (Conservative) 868
Tony Turner (BNP) 665
Rev Robert West (BNP) 650
Peter Chapman (BNP) 605
Michael Howard (Independent) 558
Warrender (Independent) 475
Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"We shall go on till the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island what ever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches and we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We will never surrender".
(Extract from speech delivered on 13th May 1940)
Now on 3rd May 2007 the Holbeach Town Ward Unit of the BNP contested the same three-Member ward and achieved 2000 votes for its three candidates whilst the Tories - with 3,000 votes - took all the three vacancies for the town. The Independents trailed with about 1,000 votes. Cheers of triumph resounded from the Tory side when it became clear that Revd West had failed to regain his seat, this time as a BNP candidate. However, elation soon turned to grimace as, on local TV and to the local press, the Revd graciously castigated the Conservative Party as leading this country to ruin; and pointed out - in his full clerical garb - how only the BNP could turn Britain round to achieve what is right and capture the values that made us what we are, what we once were; and what we should be in the futurre. There was no air of defeat about the Holbeach BNP Unit - far from it with such a result from nowhere and in such a short period of political time.
In the bigger scheme of things the result in Holbeach is a major success: it shows what can be done with dedication even in one of Toryland's safest seats and wards. Watch-out traitor-tory con-man: the BNP are here, and we are here to stay. But neither will we be resting on our laurels. Many lessons have been learnt and will continue to be learned in the next few months and years as we work for total victory in our country over the forces of wickedness which seek to engulf us.
The detailed breakdown was as follows:
Francis Biggadyke (Conservative) 1116
Rudkin (Conservative) 893
Michael Taylor (Conservative) 868
Tony Turner (BNP) 665
Rev Robert West (BNP) 650
Peter Chapman (BNP) 605
Michael Howard (Independent) 558
Warrender (Independent) 475
Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"We shall go on till the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island what ever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches and we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We will never surrender".
(Extract from speech delivered on 13th May 1940)
Wednesday, 2 May 2007
D Day Minus 1 - 22 Hours and 56 minutes to go
We are almost at D Day for the elections. The ward has been swept three times, our people are tired but in good spirits. Tommorow will be a long and hard day for all patriots fighting to establish a beachead in council chambers throughout this land - our Britain! I wish to thank all decent men and women for the time and effort you have put in - from the street activists to the internet bloggers who have all contributed to the ongoing camapign to rescue our beloved islands from the wreckers we currently have in power. The polling stations open in less than 24 hours and we have our volunteers ready for the big push. Win or lose we have done all we can. Depending on the timing of the count i will post the results for our ward on Friday morning.
Gentlemen - Good Luck to you all!
I make no aplogies for re-using an old quote below.
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips, Straining upon the start. The game's afoot, Follow your spirit; and upon this charge Cry "God for Harry! England and Saint George".
(Henry V - Henry urges his men into the attack at the Siege of Harfleur)
Gentlemen - Good Luck to you all!
I make no aplogies for re-using an old quote below.
I see you stand like greyhounds in the slips, Straining upon the start. The game's afoot, Follow your spirit; and upon this charge Cry "God for Harry! England and Saint George".
(Henry V - Henry urges his men into the attack at the Siege of Harfleur)
Saturday, 28 April 2007
Operation Freedom - Report From The Battlefront
As the freedom fighters of the British National Party continue building on their support base in preparation for Thursdays offensive against the unholy forces of the traitorous Lib/Lab/Con alliance, reports from the front bode well. In my area the canvassing is going well with the "ayes" equalling the "nays" for voting day. However the number of "possibles" is large, and considering our voter base is always likely to be understated, we are quietly confident that we may yet pull off the unexpected and take a seat within the ward. Our canvassing teams have put in a phenomenal amount of man hours, including one activist who is currently putting in 10 hour days five days a week, and who took a month off work to be able to do so! Needless to say, i will be buying him good English ale for quite some time if we win! Our local press have given us equal coverage, as they have other party candidates, with no anti-BNP slant whatsovever. I have had people come up to me in my local pub to tell me they will be voting BNP and "the BNP are what we need around here - you will have my vote". I have only had 2 "screamers" (brainwashed anti-bnp lunatics who feel the need to shout) who i told i would put down as "possibles", which wound them up even more! Considering the ward has 4500 voters, only two lunatics is a welcome respite from my day job................
Anyway i am about to hit the streets again and my next post will be after the election - whatever you do, DONT FORGET TO VOTE - VOTE BNP!
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) - american philosopher & poet
"I feel in regard to this aged England, that she see a little better on a cloudy day and that, in a storm of battle and calamity, she has a secret vigour and a pulse like a cannon".
Anyway i am about to hit the streets again and my next post will be after the election - whatever you do, DONT FORGET TO VOTE - VOTE BNP!
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) - american philosopher & poet
"I feel in regard to this aged England, that she see a little better on a cloudy day and that, in a storm of battle and calamity, she has a secret vigour and a pulse like a cannon".
Friday, 6 April 2007
Look For Us Coming On The Dawn Of The Fourth Day
All over this sceptered isle of ours the beleagured citizens of the land are being overun by the forces of darkness. Our traitorous politicians and their servants are continually pushing our people further down the path of political correctness, the islamification of our our once great land, and we are made to feel normal is abnormal and vice versa - and may God help you if you defy them! A band of brave men and women stand together, and even now are rallying to lead the fightback against this horde of self serving multiculturalists. The British Resistance - the BNP - are fielding a record number of candidates in the May 3rd elections ( of which i am proud to be among their number) in an attempt to turn back the yoke descending on the free indigenous people of these islands. The election is set for the Third of May in the year of our Lord 2007, and although some of us will fall to wayside, a number of us will be elected. The election results will be published on the 4th May - so, Look For Us Coming On The Dawn Of The Fourth Day - the tide will turn. You need to have faith in your fellow countrymen and you need to VOTE. VOTE BNP!
Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"I see the damage done by the enemy....but I also see the spirit of an unconquerable people."
Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"I see the damage done by the enemy....but I also see the spirit of an unconquerable people."
Wednesday, 28 March 2007
Fair Minded Report
The Spalding Guardian paper recently interviewd Nick Griffin when he came to speak at a local venue. the coverage was even-handed and fair. The paper has printed many letters from supporters over the years and is one of the better local papers. the report can be viewed here by clicking the link!
http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=829&ArticleID=2122051
http://www.spaldingtoday.co.uk/ViewArticle2.aspx?SectionID=829&ArticleID=2122051
A Busy Time
Well the last couple of weeks have been hectic, thats for sure! With the May 3rd elections only a few weeks away it has been all hands to the pumps. Due to the extra workload i have not been able to post as regularly as i would like too, and this does not look like changing much until May!
However i will endeavour to catch up with some posts over the next few days.
The Daily Mirror, toilet rag that it is, owned by the Trinity Mirror Group has had its own bus out and about celebrating the benefits of our multi-culti land (as seen through the rose tinted spectacles that are supplied when they climb into their ivory towers), and completely ignoring the reality of the situation on the streets here in Britain. I can and do cook a good curry but it dosent mean i want thirteen take-aways on my high street, yet the Mirror tells its picture readers that this is whats great about diversity! Visit my town and the benefits are here for all to enjoy.
Enjoy NOT being able to get an NHS dentist
Enjoy the louts outside the local takeaways scumming up the pavements til all hours
Enjoy being on the bottom of the housing list for 8 years as the "priority" cases are dealt with first (thats anyone not born here,on the scrounge and never paid a penny into the system they are encouraged to pillage at the expense of the indigenous population)
Enjoy drunken foreign criminals driving like madmen around the town
Enjoy your council tax increases to finance "diversity" initiatives - at your cost!
Enjoy the South African shop
Enjoy the Polish shop
Enjoy the closure of your home-grown local shops and the increase of take-aways and betting shops on the high street.
If, like me, you are actually NOT enjoying this celebration of every-other-culture-except-your-own, then on May 3rd VOTE BNP!
However i will endeavour to catch up with some posts over the next few days.
The Daily Mirror, toilet rag that it is, owned by the Trinity Mirror Group has had its own bus out and about celebrating the benefits of our multi-culti land (as seen through the rose tinted spectacles that are supplied when they climb into their ivory towers), and completely ignoring the reality of the situation on the streets here in Britain. I can and do cook a good curry but it dosent mean i want thirteen take-aways on my high street, yet the Mirror tells its picture readers that this is whats great about diversity! Visit my town and the benefits are here for all to enjoy.
Enjoy NOT being able to get an NHS dentist
Enjoy the louts outside the local takeaways scumming up the pavements til all hours
Enjoy being on the bottom of the housing list for 8 years as the "priority" cases are dealt with first (thats anyone not born here,on the scrounge and never paid a penny into the system they are encouraged to pillage at the expense of the indigenous population)
Enjoy drunken foreign criminals driving like madmen around the town
Enjoy your council tax increases to finance "diversity" initiatives - at your cost!
Enjoy the South African shop
Enjoy the Polish shop
Enjoy the closure of your home-grown local shops and the increase of take-aways and betting shops on the high street.
If, like me, you are actually NOT enjoying this celebration of every-other-culture-except-your-own, then on May 3rd VOTE BNP!
Saturday, 10 March 2007
Cry "God for Harry! England and Saint George!".
The hair-raising battle cry of Henry V extolling his countrymen into the breech at the siege of Harfleur against the French in William Shakespeares Henry V. My fellow nationalist blogger The Green Arrow (link on left) has today called for a new crusade against the forces of darkness that are arrayed against the freeborn British people of this land. The Free English people are stirring again, waking from the sleep that the country has been in for the last decade of marxist rule. Our lands have been traded piece by piece by our traitorous politicians to the power-mongers of the EU, the ever more fervent demands of the Muslims jihadists,and they have encouraged morally bankrupt narcissitic lifestyles and the have now - pay later consumer culture that we are led to believe will bring us contentment, if not happiness. All of these issues are a threat to our well-being as a nation of free people. The modern crusaders, the defenders of our homeland, are the BNP. The British National Party, outnumbered, outgunned, and with a hostile media attacking us almost daily, stand firm in our defence of the Free British People. The future of Britain is the BNP and is in your hands! Join, support and vote for the BNP at the May 3rd elections. No candidate to vote for? Fight for your freedom, have some guts, and stand yourself!
This is no time for armchair warriors, but a time to make a stand - stand up for yourself, your children and your childrens children! They will thank you for it in the long run. If you are not prepared to join the New Crusade then yes, youll live, but you will live under the yoke of ever more oppressive legislation, muslim law as they push and push towards an islamic state,and the status of a second class citizen in your own homeland. Fight, and we MAY lose - but we will go down fighting, not grovelling, not scared to speak out and in the knowledge of knowing who we are! BUT we can win, and winning changes all the rules! Our country back to safe and secure borders, a country with a first class health and education system for all OUR people. So i urge each and every one of you to rally to the new crusade and help the BNP in our defence of this sceptred isle! Once more into the breech! Once more into the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. Cry "God for Harry!, England and St.George!"
William Shakespeare
"And gentlemen in England now abed shall think themselves accursed they were not here, And hold their manhoods cheap while any speaks that fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day"
This is no time for armchair warriors, but a time to make a stand - stand up for yourself, your children and your childrens children! They will thank you for it in the long run. If you are not prepared to join the New Crusade then yes, youll live, but you will live under the yoke of ever more oppressive legislation, muslim law as they push and push towards an islamic state,and the status of a second class citizen in your own homeland. Fight, and we MAY lose - but we will go down fighting, not grovelling, not scared to speak out and in the knowledge of knowing who we are! BUT we can win, and winning changes all the rules! Our country back to safe and secure borders, a country with a first class health and education system for all OUR people. So i urge each and every one of you to rally to the new crusade and help the BNP in our defence of this sceptred isle! Once more into the breech! Once more into the breach, dear friends, once more; Or close the wall up with our English dead. Cry "God for Harry!, England and St.George!"
William Shakespeare
"And gentlemen in England now abed shall think themselves accursed they were not here, And hold their manhoods cheap while any speaks that fought with us upon Saint Crispin's day"
Friday, 9 March 2007
Backlog of Illegals Cleared
Well i dont know about the rest of you but yesterday i had my ear glued to the radio throughout the day. I eagerly anticipated announcers reporting our ferryports and airports at a complete standstill as hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants with mobile phones exited our land poste haste, under what must rank as one of the hardest hitting government initiatives we have yet seen! How many actually left? That would be none then, Mr Reid? Nil, nada, zilch. I want to know what these boys in the homeoffice are on - maybe some of Cameroons stash? After getting over my shock at finding my country still full of illegals, i thought of a few questions:
1) Were they text in English? If so - we may as well give up now, as even half the bloody "legals" cant speak English after years here.
2)If they were text in a multitude of foreign tongues - how many languages and translators were involved?
3)Were they given phone credit to "pass it on"?
4)Were any that did turn up for deportation sent back into the UK as they didnt have a passport?
5) If we have their phone numbers then they can be traced easily and removed from the country - why havent we done so?
The mind boggles! I also understand that they will no longer be allowed to claim benefits. Excuse me, but for a moment there i thought Reid said "no longer claim benefits" - does the word "illegal" as applied to criminal immigrants mean nothing to our "not fit for purpose" home secretary? How in gods name are we giving money and services to people who are not even here legally! As usual the liberal left bedwetters are wringing their hands and snivelling into their fairtrade hankies that this will cause hardship amongst the illegals, making them destitute and more likely to turn to crime (like that isnt an issue currently?). Its a tough old world out there and in Britain we are full up and fed up! Reid needs to get a grip on reality and then get a grip on these illegals and remove them pronto. That will save the taxpayer (yes - you and i again) countless millions of pounds, would mean some additional work would become available for the indigenous British population AT A DECENT RATE of pay (this "argument", if it can be called one, that the migrants and illegals "do the jobs the british wont" is garbage and morally flawed - it is corporate greed - that is all!).
I am sure the government will roll out further "initiatives" over the coming weeks as we head towards various elections. This type of action does nothing but give ammunition to the chattering classes, making no impact at all in the real world we inhabit.
Post Script: apparently ONE illegal was sighted on a li-lo heading towards France. However when apprehended he claimed (through a taxpayer paid for translator) he had merely got the tide times wrong and would be back again tommorow
Rupert Brooke (1887-1915) - English Poet:
If i should die, think only this of me: That there's some corner of a foreign field that is for ever England. There shall be in that rich earth a richer dust concealed, a dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, gave once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, a body of England's, breathing English air, washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.
And think, this heart, all evil shed away, a pulse in the eternal mind, no less gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given, her sights and sounds, dreams happy as her day, and laughter, learnt of friends,and gentleness, in hearts at peace, under an English heaven".
("The Soldier" - 1914)
1) Were they text in English? If so - we may as well give up now, as even half the bloody "legals" cant speak English after years here.
2)If they were text in a multitude of foreign tongues - how many languages and translators were involved?
3)Were they given phone credit to "pass it on"?
4)Were any that did turn up for deportation sent back into the UK as they didnt have a passport?
5) If we have their phone numbers then they can be traced easily and removed from the country - why havent we done so?
The mind boggles! I also understand that they will no longer be allowed to claim benefits. Excuse me, but for a moment there i thought Reid said "no longer claim benefits" - does the word "illegal" as applied to criminal immigrants mean nothing to our "not fit for purpose" home secretary? How in gods name are we giving money and services to people who are not even here legally! As usual the liberal left bedwetters are wringing their hands and snivelling into their fairtrade hankies that this will cause hardship amongst the illegals, making them destitute and more likely to turn to crime (like that isnt an issue currently?). Its a tough old world out there and in Britain we are full up and fed up! Reid needs to get a grip on reality and then get a grip on these illegals and remove them pronto. That will save the taxpayer (yes - you and i again) countless millions of pounds, would mean some additional work would become available for the indigenous British population AT A DECENT RATE of pay (this "argument", if it can be called one, that the migrants and illegals "do the jobs the british wont" is garbage and morally flawed - it is corporate greed - that is all!).
I am sure the government will roll out further "initiatives" over the coming weeks as we head towards various elections. This type of action does nothing but give ammunition to the chattering classes, making no impact at all in the real world we inhabit.
Post Script: apparently ONE illegal was sighted on a li-lo heading towards France. However when apprehended he claimed (through a taxpayer paid for translator) he had merely got the tide times wrong and would be back again tommorow
Rupert Brooke (1887-1915) - English Poet:
If i should die, think only this of me: That there's some corner of a foreign field that is for ever England. There shall be in that rich earth a richer dust concealed, a dust whom England bore, shaped, made aware, gave once, her flowers to love, her ways to roam, a body of England's, breathing English air, washed by the rivers, blest by suns of home.
And think, this heart, all evil shed away, a pulse in the eternal mind, no less gives somewhere back the thoughts by England given, her sights and sounds, dreams happy as her day, and laughter, learnt of friends,and gentleness, in hearts at peace, under an English heaven".
("The Soldier" - 1914)
Saturday, 3 March 2007
Muslims Pushed Back Again............
In an earlier post i wrote about a case in Buckinghamshire where a muslim pupil was taking legal action (or rather the people behind her were - she is only 12) to allow the wearing of the niqab - the full-face or "letterbox" veil. It appeared that as is the norm it was going to cost us (the taxpayer) a shedload of our hard earned money whichever way the case went. However, in what appears as a glint of common sense from the courts, her case has been lost and she cannot wear the veil in school! For legal reasons, both the girl and the school cannot be identified and it is believed the girl has been taught at home (at a cost to the taxpayer no doubt!) after falling foul of the ban last year. About 120 of the school's 1300 pupils are Muslims. About half of them wear the hijab headscarf, which is allowed. In his judgement, Mr Justice Silber said the ban was "proportionate". Firstly because the veil prevented teachers from seeing the faces and expressions of the pupils. Secondly, the necessity of enforcing a reasonable school uniform policy to ensure equality (hmm - theres THAT word again) amongst the pupils; thirdly to prevent peer pressure on girls to take up wearing the full veil/letterbox and, finally, to avoid unwanted visitors using the veil as a disguise in order to breach the school's security.The school's head teacher welcomed the court's decision and costs in the case were awarded against the girl's family. Well thats good news - the banning of this bat headgear is to be welcomed always as it is not a religious requirement for muslims, only an outwardly visible sign of separation and non-integration into the host community here in the UK. And they have had the costs awarded against them! This is great news for the taxpayer and maybe, just maybe, might make these people think again before pushing at the boundaries of hospitality and law in this isle of ours. When will these people realise that our country and constitution (the Bill of Rights, such as it is) is not a "living" document that is open to change by whatever bunch of chancers fancy their arm to do so. If you want to live here then abide by OUR laws, OUR culture, OUR rules - if you dont like it then leave and go and live in an islamic state elsewhere! OUR COUNTRY IS NOT FOR YOU TO DO AS YOU WANT!
William Shakespeare (1564-1616)
"This blessed plot, this earth, this realm. This England, this nurse, this teaming womb of royal kings".
(John of Gaunts speech in Richard II)
William Shakespeare (1564-1616)
"This blessed plot, this earth, this realm. This England, this nurse, this teaming womb of royal kings".
(John of Gaunts speech in Richard II)
Poles Apart
The Polish health service are refusing to treat Britons who fall ill while in their country! Instead the unfortunate potential patients are being sent back to the UK for treatment. The poles first claimed it was on the grounds of spreading infection. So, let me get this right, you have an infectious illness but instead of a course of treatment "on site" so to speak, you have to travel home and during the trip you will not infect anyone else? I did check that this was Poland and NOT Ireland - and indeed it is. After being soundly bashed by blisteringly belligerent Britons complaining to their embassies the Poles then came up with another "reason" for the non treatment of foreign nationals. Namely that their health service was overloaded and could not cope! Im sorry but for a moment there i thought they said they could not cope? After nearly choking on my Cocoa (good job i wasnt in poland, eh?) i thought about the implications. Now we have god only knows how many Poles here in the UK (three-quarters of a million seems to be the standard uneducated guess) ALL with access to our third world health service for free. Our local hospital, the Pilgrim (oh the irony) at Boston is full of poles and other foreign nationals. It is particularly full in A & E at the weekends when they seek treatment after sharing their "culture" with each other - a culture seeming to consist of getting as pissed as possible on cheap vodka and bashing each other about, or crashing their uninsured cars while semi-comatose (im not joking here - i have seen it with my own eyes, the worst being three separate car crashes on my local high street on a friday night with the drivers too drunk even to get out of the cars). We should take a leaf out of the poles book and refuse to treat these drunken, self injuring sons-of-bitches and send THEM back to poland for treatment. Every nurse, doctor or staff member at our hospitals could then get on treating the British people who have contributed something to the service instead of patching up unwanted cheap foreign labour who ignore many of our laws and cause untold damage to our health service by clogging the system through their own stupidity.
Britain is being severely damaged by cheap foreign labour - we are paying £77 million in benefits to them each year as well a providing translators, school places etc - and that is without the impact of job losses among the local British workforce. The BNP will exit the EU as fast a you can say " a chep buttle ov wodka ant an ambu-lence pleez" and stop the farcial shennanigans of many of these so called "guest workers" - who are certainly not guests nor, judging by the amount of benefits they are scrounging, workers either! VOTE BNP! OUT OF EUROPE!
William Wordsworth - Poet
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."
Britain is being severely damaged by cheap foreign labour - we are paying £77 million in benefits to them each year as well a providing translators, school places etc - and that is without the impact of job losses among the local British workforce. The BNP will exit the EU as fast a you can say " a chep buttle ov wodka ant an ambu-lence pleez" and stop the farcial shennanigans of many of these so called "guest workers" - who are certainly not guests nor, judging by the amount of benefits they are scrounging, workers either! VOTE BNP! OUT OF EUROPE!
William Wordsworth - Poet
"We must be free or die, who speak the tongue that Shakespeare spoke, the faith and morals which Milton held..."
Friday, 23 February 2007
Terror Alert Level Upgrade
Security services (MI5) have today announced an immediate security upgrade in mainland UK effective as of 13.00 hours. The Labour Government have reacted to the security alert by raising their Public Security Level from "Scoundrels" to "You Dirty Rotters". Amidst a flurry of extremist activity it is expected that levels will be raised again to "Bloody Disgusting" or even "Absolutely Furious". (As a side note, Londoners have not been "Absolutely Furious" since the Blitz in 1940, when tea supplies almost ran out. Terrorists have been re-categorised from "Simply Not Cricket" to "Damned Unsporting". The last time an alert of this magnitude was issued was during the Norman invasion in 1066AD).
As a direct result of our own increased security level, the following countries have increased theirs accordingly:
The French Government has announced that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Run and Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was initially precipitated by a recent terrorist attack that destroyed the French white flag factory, effectively paralysing the countries military capabilities.
Italy has increased its alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing". Two further levels remain to the Italian government. They are: Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides", a level which was last issued in World War Two.
Ireland initially raised its threat level to "Offer Them Refuelling Facilities for U-Boats" , a level withdrawn when a passing schoolboy pointed out that the terrorists did not have any yet. The level remains at "Have The Crack".
Germanys security level has increased from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Sing Marching Songs" with again a further two options of "Invade Your Neighbours" and "Lose".
The USA, not wanting to be sidelined, has gone from "Wait and See Whos Winning" to "What is Friendly Fire?"
Finally, all of Belguim has gone on holiday as the only threat they face is NATO pulling out of Brussels.
As a direct result of our own increased security level, the following countries have increased theirs accordingly:
The French Government has announced that it has raised its terror alert level from "Run" to "Run and Hide". The only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate". The rise was initially precipitated by a recent terrorist attack that destroyed the French white flag factory, effectively paralysing the countries military capabilities.
Italy has increased its alert level from "Shout Loudly and Excitedly" to "Elaborate Military Posturing". Two further levels remain to the Italian government. They are: Ineffective Combat Operations" and "Change Sides", a level which was last issued in World War Two.
Ireland initially raised its threat level to "Offer Them Refuelling Facilities for U-Boats" , a level withdrawn when a passing schoolboy pointed out that the terrorists did not have any yet. The level remains at "Have The Crack".
Germanys security level has increased from "Disdainful Arrogance" to "Sing Marching Songs" with again a further two options of "Invade Your Neighbours" and "Lose".
The USA, not wanting to be sidelined, has gone from "Wait and See Whos Winning" to "What is Friendly Fire?"
Finally, all of Belguim has gone on holiday as the only threat they face is NATO pulling out of Brussels.
Agincourt - A Very English Victory
Date: 25th October 1415
Agincourt in northern France
Henry V was an outstanding soldier, strategically and tactically aware he was ruthless to religious and political opponents.Born in 1387 he spent most of his life in warfare and died while campaigning in 1422.
After taking the town of Harfleur Henry moved across France. On the 24th October he found his way blocked by a French force of 25,000 heavily armed troops.
They prepared for the battle which would surely see the English wiped out the next day.
By this time Henry had only 6,000 men, comprising of 5,000 archers and 1,000 men-at-arms. However the archers were armed with a weapon that was to command battlefields for years to come, the English Longbow.
Probably Welsh in origin, and adapted, the longbow required immense strength to fire, but it had a huge range and an experienced man could fire twelve arrows in a minute, the crossbow could manage only two. The English had perfected the art by making it law for the populace to practice on Sundays. Even today many villages and towns still have a village green which was originally used for this purpose.The huge French army, which was led by Charles D'Albret, sat and waited for the English to make a move so that it could go in for the kill.
Henry decided to advance to within 200 yards of the French with the cry 'Advance banners!'From there they sent a volley of arrows which struck ferociously into the first French ranks.There had been heavy rain and the ground, which was ploughed, was soft and muddy. In addition the field was narrow and thick woods protected Henrys flanks. This forced the massive French force to bunch together as they advanced, effectively channelling them towards the English frontline. As they came forward the English archers fired their first volleys. Within five minutes the entire first wave of French were reduced to a helpless bloody mess struggling in their heavy armour. Their arrows soon gone, the lightly armoured English archers darted about the struggling French masses, retrieving arrows and dispatching struggling men-at-arms with daggers. Still the French came on, pushed forward by pride and arrogance. Time and time again the waves of attack were stopped, the English archers now protected by a wall of French dead. Finally the French reserves led by the Duke of Brabant made a final attempt to break the English line, but he had effectively joined a lost battle and was just in time to be killed. The French retreated.
The French losses were put at 10,000 including its commander Charles D'Albret. Only a handful of English were lost (some sources estimate as low as 23 men). Henry and his men had shown tremendous courage in the face of overwhelming odds and had been assisted by favourable ground conditions. It was a great English victory and one well worth remembering!
Lord Admiral Horatio Nelson
"First, you must implicitly obey orders… Secondly, you must consider every man as your enemy who speaks ill of your King... And thirdly, you must hate a Frenchman as you do the devil".
(Giving advice to a new recruit on how to survive in the Royal Navy)
Agincourt in northern France
Henry V was an outstanding soldier, strategically and tactically aware he was ruthless to religious and political opponents.Born in 1387 he spent most of his life in warfare and died while campaigning in 1422.
After taking the town of Harfleur Henry moved across France. On the 24th October he found his way blocked by a French force of 25,000 heavily armed troops.
They prepared for the battle which would surely see the English wiped out the next day.
By this time Henry had only 6,000 men, comprising of 5,000 archers and 1,000 men-at-arms. However the archers were armed with a weapon that was to command battlefields for years to come, the English Longbow.
Probably Welsh in origin, and adapted, the longbow required immense strength to fire, but it had a huge range and an experienced man could fire twelve arrows in a minute, the crossbow could manage only two. The English had perfected the art by making it law for the populace to practice on Sundays. Even today many villages and towns still have a village green which was originally used for this purpose.The huge French army, which was led by Charles D'Albret, sat and waited for the English to make a move so that it could go in for the kill.
Henry decided to advance to within 200 yards of the French with the cry 'Advance banners!'From there they sent a volley of arrows which struck ferociously into the first French ranks.There had been heavy rain and the ground, which was ploughed, was soft and muddy. In addition the field was narrow and thick woods protected Henrys flanks. This forced the massive French force to bunch together as they advanced, effectively channelling them towards the English frontline. As they came forward the English archers fired their first volleys. Within five minutes the entire first wave of French were reduced to a helpless bloody mess struggling in their heavy armour. Their arrows soon gone, the lightly armoured English archers darted about the struggling French masses, retrieving arrows and dispatching struggling men-at-arms with daggers. Still the French came on, pushed forward by pride and arrogance. Time and time again the waves of attack were stopped, the English archers now protected by a wall of French dead. Finally the French reserves led by the Duke of Brabant made a final attempt to break the English line, but he had effectively joined a lost battle and was just in time to be killed. The French retreated.
The French losses were put at 10,000 including its commander Charles D'Albret. Only a handful of English were lost (some sources estimate as low as 23 men). Henry and his men had shown tremendous courage in the face of overwhelming odds and had been assisted by favourable ground conditions. It was a great English victory and one well worth remembering!
Lord Admiral Horatio Nelson
"First, you must implicitly obey orders… Secondly, you must consider every man as your enemy who speaks ill of your King... And thirdly, you must hate a Frenchman as you do the devil".
(Giving advice to a new recruit on how to survive in the Royal Navy)
What About Our Own People?
This is the stuff of nightmares. I know Spalding very well and am aware of the housing problems faced by many local people:
Lincolnshire Housing plan for Migrant Workers
It is reported in the local paper, the Spalding Guardian (www.spaldingtoday.co.uk) of 15th February, that local migrant labour peddler "Ray Turner Labour Ltd" has submitted plans to house up to 300 migrant workers on a new development near Spalding in Lincolnshire. Currently Spalding is overwhelmed with migrant labour due to the pressures on the food industry from the major supermarkets. This is being fed by the greed of local businesses wishing to cash in on the exploitation of foreign migrant labour. Spalding is becoming so "enriched" that it is difficult to hear English being spoken in the town, and when out shopping. A council employee recently commented how nice it was to deal with an English person for a change!
The papers own poll currently shows 77% of people against the development, but unsurprisingly, residents fear that the council and local opinion will be overridden by the ODPM (office of the deputy prime minister) and permission will be granted. This will bring the strain on local health and education services to a crisis point, as often the migrant workers in this area do not send their money home, but bring their relatives to the town, as in the case of Milda Staffieri, who brags that the development "would be a big boost for migrant workers". With hot-bedding already a big problem in the area, this could be a major source of tension as Spalding already has one of the highest unemployment rates in the area, mainly due to unethically imported (and unwanted) foreign labour.
I was in my local pub last night and a local couple were telling me that they had been on the housing list for seven years and now, due to an influx of foreign workers and their dependants, have been told that have been downgraded yet again! They had no idea of when or even if they could expect to be suitably housed. This situation is fast becoming intolerable for many local people. The locals will oppose any planning permissions sought by greedy local businesses to house their exploited workers. However, this alone will not help those Britons who do not have access to low-cost housingt. We need a change of policy and this starts at grassroots level by changing from the old parties to one that will put the indigenous people first! That party is the BNP!
Lincolnshire Housing plan for Migrant Workers
It is reported in the local paper, the Spalding Guardian (www.spaldingtoday.co.uk) of 15th February, that local migrant labour peddler "Ray Turner Labour Ltd" has submitted plans to house up to 300 migrant workers on a new development near Spalding in Lincolnshire. Currently Spalding is overwhelmed with migrant labour due to the pressures on the food industry from the major supermarkets. This is being fed by the greed of local businesses wishing to cash in on the exploitation of foreign migrant labour. Spalding is becoming so "enriched" that it is difficult to hear English being spoken in the town, and when out shopping. A council employee recently commented how nice it was to deal with an English person for a change!
The papers own poll currently shows 77% of people against the development, but unsurprisingly, residents fear that the council and local opinion will be overridden by the ODPM (office of the deputy prime minister) and permission will be granted. This will bring the strain on local health and education services to a crisis point, as often the migrant workers in this area do not send their money home, but bring their relatives to the town, as in the case of Milda Staffieri, who brags that the development "would be a big boost for migrant workers". With hot-bedding already a big problem in the area, this could be a major source of tension as Spalding already has one of the highest unemployment rates in the area, mainly due to unethically imported (and unwanted) foreign labour.
I was in my local pub last night and a local couple were telling me that they had been on the housing list for seven years and now, due to an influx of foreign workers and their dependants, have been told that have been downgraded yet again! They had no idea of when or even if they could expect to be suitably housed. This situation is fast becoming intolerable for many local people. The locals will oppose any planning permissions sought by greedy local businesses to house their exploited workers. However, this alone will not help those Britons who do not have access to low-cost housingt. We need a change of policy and this starts at grassroots level by changing from the old parties to one that will put the indigenous people first! That party is the BNP!
Friday, 16 February 2007
Black on Black Killings - Peckham
I watched the news the other night, flicking between the BBC and ITV propaganda. The reporters were all in a frenzy trying to out dramatise each other while reporting on the latest shootings in "sarf landan" - this time in Peckham. What caught my attention? The BBC reporter said that the permanent police operation Trident were meeting in the morning to investigate this latest episode and explained that Trident was set up to combat crime "affecting the black community". Nothing sinister in that description, i hear you mutter. However the ITV reporter a few minutes later said that Trident was a ongoing police operation investigating Black on Black gun crime! Now theres a world of difference between the two descriptions used and the BBC report makes no mention of race - no surprise there! So i dug around a little and found that Trident is indeed an ongoing police operation with over 300 police officers and 70 support staff that are dedicated to Trident, supported and informed by Trident's "Independent Advisory Group" whoever they are. Thats about 1.5% of the London Police Force (sorry, "service") on full time duties trying to stop black on black gun crime in the capital. Assuming the average mean pay of the officers is circa £30k that is a cost of £12,000,000 per annum for what is a minority of criminals within the black community! Del Boy would be turning in his car coat.......
Stephen Leacock (1869-1944)
"American politicians do anything for money... English politicians take the money and won't do anything ".
Stephen Leacock (1869-1944)
"American politicians do anything for money... English politicians take the money and won't do anything ".
Horse, Stable, Bolted....................
According to the papers plans for a new 700-bed jail beside South-east London's maximum security Belmarsh prison have been announced by unfit-for-purpose Home Secretary John Reid.
He also revealed that planning permission had been secured for a new 600-place prison near Ashworth high security mental hospital in Merseyside.
The two projects together are likely to cost more than £160m to build, although the Home Office refused to disclose official costings ahead of a bidding process for construction contracts (which probably means that as usual they havent got a clue).
A site has been purchased by the Home Office next to Belmarsh - one of the most secure prisons in the country which features a special "jail within a jail" housing many Muslim terrorists. The planned new prison is expected to be a lower risk Category C jail.
The Home Secretary said: "We are working flat out (Government speak for doing bugger-all) to deliver additional capacity within the prison system. In July last year I announced plans for an extra 8,000 places to be delivered by 2012. That process starts now. We already own two potential sites for new prisons and I can announce today that one of them is at Maghull, where we already have planning permission to provide up to 600 new places by 2010. A second is next door to Belmarsh prison in south-east London, where we are still in discussion with the planning authorities.
In total, our building programme now amounts to about 8,000 new places over the next five years. In 2007 alone, I am planning to deliver about 2,500 new places, including about 1,500 by July, with new places at 13 different prisons."
Apparently Reid will say during a visit to Maghull that another 30 sites are being considered for new jails across the country.
Now i might be missing the maths here but as i understand that we are currently short of around 11,000 prison places as of February 2007. Therefore even if no additional felons in the country are sent to prison between now and 2012, apart from on a one-out one-in basis we will still be short some 3000 prison places! Funnily enough the figure of 11,000 is precisely the same amount as the number of foreign criminals in our jails.........so to me the solution is to deport ALL 11,000 of the foreign criminal scum currently languishing in Her Majestys prisons and fill the places up with our own home-grown scum. As usual Nu-Labour have no real solution and are, as always, too little too late in their approach to any contact with the real world. The words horse, stable and bolted spring to mind.
Samuel Johnson
"He that wishes to see his country robbed of its rights can not be a patriot".
He also revealed that planning permission had been secured for a new 600-place prison near Ashworth high security mental hospital in Merseyside.
The two projects together are likely to cost more than £160m to build, although the Home Office refused to disclose official costings ahead of a bidding process for construction contracts (which probably means that as usual they havent got a clue).
A site has been purchased by the Home Office next to Belmarsh - one of the most secure prisons in the country which features a special "jail within a jail" housing many Muslim terrorists. The planned new prison is expected to be a lower risk Category C jail.
The Home Secretary said: "We are working flat out (Government speak for doing bugger-all) to deliver additional capacity within the prison system. In July last year I announced plans for an extra 8,000 places to be delivered by 2012. That process starts now. We already own two potential sites for new prisons and I can announce today that one of them is at Maghull, where we already have planning permission to provide up to 600 new places by 2010. A second is next door to Belmarsh prison in south-east London, where we are still in discussion with the planning authorities.
In total, our building programme now amounts to about 8,000 new places over the next five years. In 2007 alone, I am planning to deliver about 2,500 new places, including about 1,500 by July, with new places at 13 different prisons."
Apparently Reid will say during a visit to Maghull that another 30 sites are being considered for new jails across the country.
Now i might be missing the maths here but as i understand that we are currently short of around 11,000 prison places as of February 2007. Therefore even if no additional felons in the country are sent to prison between now and 2012, apart from on a one-out one-in basis we will still be short some 3000 prison places! Funnily enough the figure of 11,000 is precisely the same amount as the number of foreign criminals in our jails.........so to me the solution is to deport ALL 11,000 of the foreign criminal scum currently languishing in Her Majestys prisons and fill the places up with our own home-grown scum. As usual Nu-Labour have no real solution and are, as always, too little too late in their approach to any contact with the real world. The words horse, stable and bolted spring to mind.
Samuel Johnson
"He that wishes to see his country robbed of its rights can not be a patriot".
Friday, 9 February 2007
Lying by Omission - Illegal Traveller Sites
I have been reading recently in the press about the illegal traveller sites in England. There has been a lot of huffing and puffing from all sides of the community and particularly from our councillors and government. The reality is this. There is NO LAW for local authorities to provide alternative sites for these people. It is only a GUIDELINE from the Secretary of State. I repeat, there is no basis in law to assist these people. They are living illegally and our councils should move them on immediately. The arguments about whether the sites are clean, whether they pay council tax or their children are at local schools are not the point. These people are trying to buck the system, purchasing land, moving onto it and then applying for retrospective planning permission. If you or i were to this do this we would be dealt with in short order. I am disgusted that our local councils have not seen fit to tell the taxpaying public that there is no legal obligation to further assist these travellers. Instead, by omission, we have been led to believe there is a legal basis for spending even more of our hard earned money on finding and purchasing these alternative sites. I hope when election time comes people will remember the way in which this "alternative sites" policy has been misleadingly presented to the public. If any councillor reading this can give a good valid reason why, i for one, would be pleased to hear it.
From the Heart
I was browsing the "your say" section of the BNP website and came across this letter:
"I have enjoyed reading the posts on this site, some are well researched, some passionate and some just down to earth common sense.All I wish to contribute is quite simple.. Please keep up the good work BNP. There are so many people out here who would love to join you but are scared to do so. In many peoples minds you are conceived as being a party of skin-headed thugs....Please work on changing this image and perception..The post from June S from Cambs was most encouraging...Thank you June.I am so fearful for those of us who are proud of being white working class or middle class people, who value our countries heritage and traditions and want to retain these things. Most of us are not 'skin-heads' or 'thugs'...we are normal (mostly Labour voting) people who live on the same council estates and housing areas as those who despise our country so much. I wish we had a BNP candidate in our area in the next elections.... I would shake his or her hand warmly and in full view of the neighbours!!"
This a not an untypical letter on the site but it struck me as a heartfelt plea from the writer. As any member or supporter will know the BNPs image is not at all as the media portray. The comment " There are so many people out here who would love to join you but are scared to do so" hurts me. All it takes people, is a little guts. A little guts to stand up and be counted. For your Country, for your Children and for your People. We do not have an infinite time to save our country and every day wasted is a day lost forever - lost to apathy or to the fear of sticking your head above the parapet. I would urge you who are not party members to look inside yourself, find a little guts, and join the BNP and become active in saving our once great nation from the wreckers currently residing in their ivory towers.
To quote "The day may come when the courage of men fails and we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship - but it is not this day! This day we fight!" Well my friends, the fighting has started in earnest and we in the BNP need your help to win!
William Shakespeare"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers...".(King Henry's call to arms of the English army before the battle of Agincourt)
"I have enjoyed reading the posts on this site, some are well researched, some passionate and some just down to earth common sense.All I wish to contribute is quite simple.. Please keep up the good work BNP. There are so many people out here who would love to join you but are scared to do so. In many peoples minds you are conceived as being a party of skin-headed thugs....Please work on changing this image and perception..The post from June S from Cambs was most encouraging...Thank you June.I am so fearful for those of us who are proud of being white working class or middle class people, who value our countries heritage and traditions and want to retain these things. Most of us are not 'skin-heads' or 'thugs'...we are normal (mostly Labour voting) people who live on the same council estates and housing areas as those who despise our country so much. I wish we had a BNP candidate in our area in the next elections.... I would shake his or her hand warmly and in full view of the neighbours!!"
This a not an untypical letter on the site but it struck me as a heartfelt plea from the writer. As any member or supporter will know the BNPs image is not at all as the media portray. The comment " There are so many people out here who would love to join you but are scared to do so" hurts me. All it takes people, is a little guts. A little guts to stand up and be counted. For your Country, for your Children and for your People. We do not have an infinite time to save our country and every day wasted is a day lost forever - lost to apathy or to the fear of sticking your head above the parapet. I would urge you who are not party members to look inside yourself, find a little guts, and join the BNP and become active in saving our once great nation from the wreckers currently residing in their ivory towers.
To quote "The day may come when the courage of men fails and we forsake our friends and break all bonds of fellowship - but it is not this day! This day we fight!" Well my friends, the fighting has started in earnest and we in the BNP need your help to win!
William Shakespeare"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers...".(King Henry's call to arms of the English army before the battle of Agincourt)
Not so Safe now?
I have just read the latest bye-election results from Bedworth. The BNP polling 31.2% of the votes in a Nu-Labour "safe" seat! (not so safe now, eh boys?). The results are:
Valerie Richardson (Lab) 658.
Alwyn Deacon (British National Party) 546.
Damon Brown (Con) 301.
Alice Field (Lib Dem) 119.
David Lane (English Democrats) 75.
Vanessa Casey (Save Our NHS) 43.
Nigel Lanigan (UK Independence Party) 8.
For the BNP standing here for the first time the results are astonishingly good, but not surprising, as Great Britains free people shake themselves from the apathy and slumber of the last decades of the old three party rule. It goes to show that if committed members and activists work hard in a given area we can sweep broad swathes through this country of ours and begin to regain our freedoms and the democracy we once took as a given. Of course, i realise that we did not win this election, but from a standing start in a previously unchallenged ward to a close second place well ahead of the Conservatives and Lib-Dead, shows we can effectively challenge all mainstream and minority parties. Vote BNP in the May elections and start down the road of being a first class citizen in a first class country again! YOUR COUNTRY! YOUR VOTE! VOTE BNP!
Valerie Richardson (Lab) 658.
Alwyn Deacon (British National Party) 546.
Damon Brown (Con) 301.
Alice Field (Lib Dem) 119.
David Lane (English Democrats) 75.
Vanessa Casey (Save Our NHS) 43.
Nigel Lanigan (UK Independence Party) 8.
For the BNP standing here for the first time the results are astonishingly good, but not surprising, as Great Britains free people shake themselves from the apathy and slumber of the last decades of the old three party rule. It goes to show that if committed members and activists work hard in a given area we can sweep broad swathes through this country of ours and begin to regain our freedoms and the democracy we once took as a given. Of course, i realise that we did not win this election, but from a standing start in a previously unchallenged ward to a close second place well ahead of the Conservatives and Lib-Dead, shows we can effectively challenge all mainstream and minority parties. Vote BNP in the May elections and start down the road of being a first class citizen in a first class country again! YOUR COUNTRY! YOUR VOTE! VOTE BNP!
Friday, 2 February 2007
Absolutely Mental
The Muslim community must be laughing all the way to the mosque in the wake of the latest anti-terror arrests. After the arrest of nine muslim terror suspects, the lunatics running the asylum that passes for Birmingham police handed out 5000 leaflets to muslims to "calm anger" in the area. And you might be forgiven for thinking that they have every reason to be angry. After all, if nine men in my home town were arrested on terror charges i would be angry too. But, no - they are not angry that they have home-grown terror suspects living with and near them, but as usual claim that muslims were being singled out by officers! I cant believe the kid gloves these invaders are handled with by the powers that be. They will never learn that the muslim communities must be treated the same as other communities. They want sharia law, they want us out of Iraq (so do i for different reasons), they force marriage upon their young people (and B.liars band of traitors have even discarded proposed new laws against that abomination), they slaughter food inhumanely (do not believe the "one cut across the throat" rubbish spouted in the press - have a look at my earlier article "sweetness and light"), often in conditions that would have you and i imprisoned so quickly you wouldnt even have time to say "mad mullah". And talking of mad mullahs, we have still heard nothing from the authorities regarding the arrest and deportation of the cast of the recent "Dispatches" documentary! Its as if they think its all going to go away if they keep their heads buried! A local councillor calls them the "ostrich" parties and with good reason!
North Somerset Council, obviously home to a large proportion of "care in the community" placements, have announced that it wants schoolchildren to wear burkas and hijabs in R.E. lessons "to help them understand islam"! Other ideas they have sent to schools include visits to a muslim exhibition where our kids can "try on" hijabs, niqabs and burkas as well as make their own prayer beads! They would also be taught to write their names in arabic and learn about the quran!
I would hope any decent parent will be up in arms about this traitorous action.
I remember years ago one of my daughters came home from school excited about a trip to a mosque in a nearby town and burst into tears when i told her there was no way on earth she was going. I withdrew her from R.E. at that school and had stern words with the headmistress about her liberal attitide to false religions. My daughter is now grown up and says i made the right decision.
What about this?
How about taking muslim schoolchildren on a trip to a church where they can "try on" nuns habits, atlar boys cassocks, make their own rosary beads, write their names in gaelic and learn about the bible? Dont forget you saw it here first! But dont hold your breath.................
Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"We shall go on till the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island what ever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches and we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We will never surrender".
(Extract from speech delivered on 13th May 1940)
North Somerset Council, obviously home to a large proportion of "care in the community" placements, have announced that it wants schoolchildren to wear burkas and hijabs in R.E. lessons "to help them understand islam"! Other ideas they have sent to schools include visits to a muslim exhibition where our kids can "try on" hijabs, niqabs and burkas as well as make their own prayer beads! They would also be taught to write their names in arabic and learn about the quran!
I would hope any decent parent will be up in arms about this traitorous action.
I remember years ago one of my daughters came home from school excited about a trip to a mosque in a nearby town and burst into tears when i told her there was no way on earth she was going. I withdrew her from R.E. at that school and had stern words with the headmistress about her liberal attitide to false religions. My daughter is now grown up and says i made the right decision.
What about this?
How about taking muslim schoolchildren on a trip to a church where they can "try on" nuns habits, atlar boys cassocks, make their own rosary beads, write their names in gaelic and learn about the bible? Dont forget you saw it here first! But dont hold your breath.................
Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
"We shall go on till the end, we shall fight in France, we shall fight on the seas and oceans, we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strength in the air, we shall defend our island what ever the cost may be. We shall fight on the beaches and we shall fight on the landing grounds, we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall fight in the hills. We will never surrender".
(Extract from speech delivered on 13th May 1940)
Thursday, 1 February 2007
Tagged Like Cattle...
ID cards are one of my pet hates, with nothing guaranteed to boil my blood faster than someone who says "if youve nothing to hide...." . There is a link on the site to the no2id campaign which i urge people to visit. It is not too long now before the first cards are issued ( i believe 2008?) and i for one will NOT be getting one! There are many arguments against this insidious form of tagging for all and i found this article below to sum up nicely. The no2id site has a pledge system to form a fighting fund to defend the prosecutions of Freeborn Britons that will follow as the government try to cow us into accepting this monstrous invasion into the lives of the indigenous free British. If enough people refuse then, as with Thatchers poll tax, the ID card law will be unenforceable.
" Many people have written at length and eloquently about the arguments against ID cards. Arguements put for ID cards have been changed and lies told without so much as a flicker of conscience from a government of utter liars who have all but destroyed our way of life and our culture and nation as they wreck our Constitution and implement their modern version of the Napoleonic Code where the State turns from Protector to Warden. Modern Britain is little short of a comfortable open prison. That the Government with a record of utter fiscal profligacy refuses to tell us what it will steal from us in order to pay for this idiocy is sufficient itself to make one reject the ID card. But despite these and the many other cogent arguments about the restriction of our historic Liberties and this draconian and dishonest imposition on us by the State, one factor which is the clincher for me has been swept under the carpet by all parties. This is the total impossibility of ID cards to provide any protection or security from terrorists or determined parasites. The reality is this. New Labour under Blair has allowed virtually uncontrolled immigration and has taken no measure to repatriate illegal immigrants or economic asylum seekers. The poison in their incompetence is that they allowed thousands of people into the country who arrived without ANY form of identification and unknown numbers of illegal immigrants with false papers. Many of the unsuccessful asylum seekers who should have been deported within 24 hours simply melted away into society. But not mainstream society. They melted into their own cultural and racial groups. One of the consequences of multiculturalism as provided by Gramsci and New Labour is virtually zero integration as multiculturalism is best defined as failed integration. Woefully late, bodies such as the CRE have lamented this but the horse left the stable years ago. We have groups of what can only be described as an admixture of parasites and our mortal enemies living amongst us and the idea that ID cards can somehow protect us from them is so spectacularly stupid as to suggest insanity on the part of those who propose it.An uncontrolled Department for Immigration has employed a disproportionate number of foreigners and their descendants in sensitive positions and this has allowed for the massive proliferation of false driving licenses, NHS cards and passports to be available on the black market. The situation is beyond rescue until and unless a massive deportation program is implemented. The British people, now so cowed by a communist school system and hideously anti British Broadcasting Corporation are by and large too frightened to say that the Emperor not only has no clothes but he is politically leprous, shedding any vestiges of truth or probity with each step he takes. It is the RESPONSIBILTY OF ALL BRITISH PEOPLE who know who they are and where they came from to refuse to take what can only be considered to be a short step from the mark of the beast. If the British are as stupid as I think they are, they will roll over and play dead and do as they are told given that so many now depend on the State to feed and clothe them either as employees or grateful beggars. But if they have any backbone then ID cards will prove to be New Labour's demise and their very own Poll Tax."
Peter Watson
Dorset February 15, 2006
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) - american philosopher & poet
"By this sacredness of individuals, the English have in seven hundred years evolved the principles of freedom".
" Many people have written at length and eloquently about the arguments against ID cards. Arguements put for ID cards have been changed and lies told without so much as a flicker of conscience from a government of utter liars who have all but destroyed our way of life and our culture and nation as they wreck our Constitution and implement their modern version of the Napoleonic Code where the State turns from Protector to Warden. Modern Britain is little short of a comfortable open prison. That the Government with a record of utter fiscal profligacy refuses to tell us what it will steal from us in order to pay for this idiocy is sufficient itself to make one reject the ID card. But despite these and the many other cogent arguments about the restriction of our historic Liberties and this draconian and dishonest imposition on us by the State, one factor which is the clincher for me has been swept under the carpet by all parties. This is the total impossibility of ID cards to provide any protection or security from terrorists or determined parasites. The reality is this. New Labour under Blair has allowed virtually uncontrolled immigration and has taken no measure to repatriate illegal immigrants or economic asylum seekers. The poison in their incompetence is that they allowed thousands of people into the country who arrived without ANY form of identification and unknown numbers of illegal immigrants with false papers. Many of the unsuccessful asylum seekers who should have been deported within 24 hours simply melted away into society. But not mainstream society. They melted into their own cultural and racial groups. One of the consequences of multiculturalism as provided by Gramsci and New Labour is virtually zero integration as multiculturalism is best defined as failed integration. Woefully late, bodies such as the CRE have lamented this but the horse left the stable years ago. We have groups of what can only be described as an admixture of parasites and our mortal enemies living amongst us and the idea that ID cards can somehow protect us from them is so spectacularly stupid as to suggest insanity on the part of those who propose it.An uncontrolled Department for Immigration has employed a disproportionate number of foreigners and their descendants in sensitive positions and this has allowed for the massive proliferation of false driving licenses, NHS cards and passports to be available on the black market. The situation is beyond rescue until and unless a massive deportation program is implemented. The British people, now so cowed by a communist school system and hideously anti British Broadcasting Corporation are by and large too frightened to say that the Emperor not only has no clothes but he is politically leprous, shedding any vestiges of truth or probity with each step he takes. It is the RESPONSIBILTY OF ALL BRITISH PEOPLE who know who they are and where they came from to refuse to take what can only be considered to be a short step from the mark of the beast. If the British are as stupid as I think they are, they will roll over and play dead and do as they are told given that so many now depend on the State to feed and clothe them either as employees or grateful beggars. But if they have any backbone then ID cards will prove to be New Labour's demise and their very own Poll Tax."
Peter Watson
Dorset February 15, 2006
Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803-1882) - american philosopher & poet
"By this sacredness of individuals, the English have in seven hundred years evolved the principles of freedom".
Retirement Bonus
RETIREMENT BONUS PAYMENTS:
If this doesn't make you laugh, you have had a humour bypass!
The Army found they had too many officers and decided to offer an early retirement bonus. They promised any officer who volunteered for retirement a bonus of £1,000 for every inch measured in a straight line between any two points in his body. The officers got to choose what those two points would be. The first officer who accepted asked that he be measured from the top of his head to the tip of his toes. He was measured at six feet and walked out witha bonus of £72,000. The second officer who accepted was a little smarter and asked to be measured from the tip of his outstretched hands to his toes. He walked out with £96,000.The third one was a noncommissioned officer, a grizzled old Sergeant who, when asked where he would like to be measured replied, "From the tip of my privates to my testicles." It was suggested by the pension man that he might want to reconsider, explaining about the nice big checks the previous two officers had received. But the old NCO insisted and they decided to go alongwith him providing the measurement was taken by a medical officer. The medical officer arrived and instructed the NCO to "drop 'em," which he did. The medical officer placed the tape measure on the tip of the NCOs privates and began to work back. "Dear Lord!" he suddenly exclaimed, "Where are your testicles?" The old NCO calmly replied, "South Georgia in the Falklands."
Bad taste i know, but it made me laugh.
If this doesn't make you laugh, you have had a humour bypass!
The Army found they had too many officers and decided to offer an early retirement bonus. They promised any officer who volunteered for retirement a bonus of £1,000 for every inch measured in a straight line between any two points in his body. The officers got to choose what those two points would be. The first officer who accepted asked that he be measured from the top of his head to the tip of his toes. He was measured at six feet and walked out witha bonus of £72,000. The second officer who accepted was a little smarter and asked to be measured from the tip of his outstretched hands to his toes. He walked out with £96,000.The third one was a noncommissioned officer, a grizzled old Sergeant who, when asked where he would like to be measured replied, "From the tip of my privates to my testicles." It was suggested by the pension man that he might want to reconsider, explaining about the nice big checks the previous two officers had received. But the old NCO insisted and they decided to go alongwith him providing the measurement was taken by a medical officer. The medical officer arrived and instructed the NCO to "drop 'em," which he did. The medical officer placed the tape measure on the tip of the NCOs privates and began to work back. "Dear Lord!" he suddenly exclaimed, "Where are your testicles?" The old NCO calmly replied, "South Georgia in the Falklands."
Bad taste i know, but it made me laugh.
Andy Rooney on CBS Sixty Minutes
This was sent to me by an American friend who is aware and sympathetic to the problems we face here. However, although many of their laws allow more freedom of speech, they still have the marxist inspired Political Correctness to contend with. I am told this is not a transcript of everyday viewing!
" Surprised CBS let him get away with this even though he's right AMEN ANDY ROONEY ! Right on, Andy Rooney! Andy Rooney said on "60 Minutes" a few weeks back:
I don't think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers. The only things I can think of that are truly discriminatory are things like the United Negro College Fund, Jet Magazine, Black Entertainment Television, and Miss Black America. Try to have things like the United Caucasian College Fund, Cloud Magazine, White Entertainment Television, or Miss White America; and see what happens...Jesse Jackson will be knocking down your door. Guns do not make you a killer. I think killing makes you a killer. You can kill someone with a baseball bat or a car, but no one is trying to ban you from driving to the ball game. I believe they are called the Boy Scouts for a reason, that is why there are no girls allowed. Girls belong in the Girl Scouts! ARE YOU LISTENING MARTHA BURKE? I think that if you feel homosexuality is wrong, it is not a phobia, it is an opinion. I have the right "NOT" to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird, or tick me off. When 70% of the people who get arrested are black, in cities where 70% of the population is black, that is not racial profiling, it is the Law of Probability. I believe that if you are selling me a milkshake, a pack of cigarettes, a newspaper or a hotel room, you must do it in English! As a matter of fact, if you want to be an American citizen, you should have to speak English! My father and grandfather didn't die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born in to come over and disrespect ours. I think the police should have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you threaten them after they tell you to stop. If you can't understand the word "freeze" or "stop" in English, see the above lines. I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you are qualified for any special loan programs, government sponsored bank loans or tax breaks, etc., so you can open a hotel, coffee shop, trinket store, or any other business. We did not go to the aid of certain foreign countries and risk our lives in wars to defend their freedoms, so that decades later they could come over here and tell us our constitution is a living document; and open to their interpretations. I don't hate the rich I don't pity the poor. I know pro wrestling is fake, but so are movies and television. That doesn't stop you from watching them. I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it ticks you off, go and invent the next operating system that's better, and put your name on the building. It doesn't take a whole village to raise a child right, but it does take a parent to stand up to the kid; and smack their little behinds when necessary, and say "NO!" I think tattoos and piercing are fine if you want them, but please don't pretend they are a political statement. And, please, stay home until that new lip ring heals. I don't want to look at your ugly infected mouth as you serve me French fries! I am sick of "Political Correctness." I know a lot of black people, and not a single one of them was born in Africa ; so how can they be "African-Americans"? Besides, Africa is a continent. I don't go around saying I am a European-American because my great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather was from Europe I am proud to be from America and nowhere else And if you don't like my point of view, tough... I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , AND TO THE REPUBLIC, FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL! It is said that 86% of Americans believe in God. Therefore I have a very hard time understanding why there is such a problem in having "In God We Trust" on our money and having "God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. Why don't we just tell the 14% to Shut Up and BE QUIET!!!
Thousands of miles away and still rings bells here..................
William Shakespeare
"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers...".
(King Henry's call to arms of the English army before the battle of Agincourt)
" Surprised CBS let him get away with this even though he's right AMEN ANDY ROONEY ! Right on, Andy Rooney! Andy Rooney said on "60 Minutes" a few weeks back:
I don't think being a minority makes you a victim of anything except numbers. The only things I can think of that are truly discriminatory are things like the United Negro College Fund, Jet Magazine, Black Entertainment Television, and Miss Black America. Try to have things like the United Caucasian College Fund, Cloud Magazine, White Entertainment Television, or Miss White America; and see what happens...Jesse Jackson will be knocking down your door. Guns do not make you a killer. I think killing makes you a killer. You can kill someone with a baseball bat or a car, but no one is trying to ban you from driving to the ball game. I believe they are called the Boy Scouts for a reason, that is why there are no girls allowed. Girls belong in the Girl Scouts! ARE YOU LISTENING MARTHA BURKE? I think that if you feel homosexuality is wrong, it is not a phobia, it is an opinion. I have the right "NOT" to be tolerant of others because they are different, weird, or tick me off. When 70% of the people who get arrested are black, in cities where 70% of the population is black, that is not racial profiling, it is the Law of Probability. I believe that if you are selling me a milkshake, a pack of cigarettes, a newspaper or a hotel room, you must do it in English! As a matter of fact, if you want to be an American citizen, you should have to speak English! My father and grandfather didn't die in vain so you can leave the countries you were born in to come over and disrespect ours. I think the police should have every right to shoot your sorry ass if you threaten them after they tell you to stop. If you can't understand the word "freeze" or "stop" in English, see the above lines. I don't think just because you were not born in this country, you are qualified for any special loan programs, government sponsored bank loans or tax breaks, etc., so you can open a hotel, coffee shop, trinket store, or any other business. We did not go to the aid of certain foreign countries and risk our lives in wars to defend their freedoms, so that decades later they could come over here and tell us our constitution is a living document; and open to their interpretations. I don't hate the rich I don't pity the poor. I know pro wrestling is fake, but so are movies and television. That doesn't stop you from watching them. I think Bill Gates has every right to keep every penny he made and continue to make more. If it ticks you off, go and invent the next operating system that's better, and put your name on the building. It doesn't take a whole village to raise a child right, but it does take a parent to stand up to the kid; and smack their little behinds when necessary, and say "NO!" I think tattoos and piercing are fine if you want them, but please don't pretend they are a political statement. And, please, stay home until that new lip ring heals. I don't want to look at your ugly infected mouth as you serve me French fries! I am sick of "Political Correctness." I know a lot of black people, and not a single one of them was born in Africa ; so how can they be "African-Americans"? Besides, Africa is a continent. I don't go around saying I am a European-American because my great, great, great, great, great, great grandfather was from Europe I am proud to be from America and nowhere else And if you don't like my point of view, tough... I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , AND TO THE REPUBLIC, FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL! It is said that 86% of Americans believe in God. Therefore I have a very hard time understanding why there is such a problem in having "In God We Trust" on our money and having "God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. Why don't we just tell the 14% to Shut Up and BE QUIET!!!
Thousands of miles away and still rings bells here..................
William Shakespeare
"We few. We happy few. We band of brothers...".
(King Henry's call to arms of the English army before the battle of Agincourt)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
